Re: JSH: A theorem can't be wrong

On 30 Apr 2005 05:42:26 -0700, jstevh@xxxxxxx wrote:


>Here it's a bit of a social thing I think that I need to focus--on a
>math newsgroup--on the pure math aspect of the SFT.

Thank You James,
Does that mean that You feel yourself persuaded? ;-)

Well, if You love mathematics that much, then do so. It is your
life, but you truly are a hell of a gambler.
sci.math can be one of the worlds most hostile environments, so I
give you a free citation from old finnish movie "You shall not remain
laying on a fire". Remember that in case the discusson temperature
would for some mysterious reasons start to raise.

>Before there's the practicality, there is the perfection of a theorem.

Exactly

Kind Regards
Juuso Hukkanen
.

Relevant Pages

  • JSH: Interesting behavior
    ... SFT itself. ... Simple answer is that "pure math" can't defend itself in the same way ... practical result on the level of the factoring problem. ... If you don't mind losing your mind, ...
    (sci.math)
  • JSH: A theorem cant be wrong
    ... So the surrogate factoring theorem (SFT) cannot be wrong. ... I like pushing away from the factoring problem to focus on the SFT ... math newsgroup--on the pure math aspect of the SFT. ... there is the perfection of a theorem. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: JSH: Surrogate Factoring Fails Completely, What Next?
    ... Rick Decker wrote: ... it still wouldn't change the "pure math" ... The SFT as a theorem is unique in terms of that approach to the ... Now, let's consider your claim as the SFT maps factors, and if it is ...
    (sci.crypt)