sci.math

• Date Index

---

• Re: Works in Progress, Lawrence House
• Partitions & equivalence relations, aaaaaaaaaaa
  • Re: Partitions & equivalence relations, Lawrence House
    • Re: Partitions & equivalence relations, David C . Ullrich
  • Re: Partitions & equivalence relations, Virgil
• Another Quad. Residue question, mathedman
• Finding a minimal cost tree for the network, Bob
• Q for readers of Russian., Jim Spriggs
  • Re: Q for readers of Russian., Rick Decker
• JSH: A theorem can't be wrong, jstevh
  • Re: JSH: A theorem can't be wrong, Jim Spriggs
  • Re: A theorem can't be wrong, N. Silver
    • Re: A theorem can't be wrong, jstevh
      • Re: A theorem can't be wrong, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: A theorem can't be wrong, N. Silver
      • Re: A theorem can't be wrong, jstevh
      • Re: A theorem can't be wrong, N. Silver
      • Re: A theorem can't be wrong, C. Bond
      • Re: A theorem can't be wrong, Nora Baron
      • Re: A theorem can't be wrong, Juuso Hukkanen
      • Re: A theorem can't be wrong, Lash Rambo
    • Re: A theorem can't be wrong, Virgil
  • Re: JSH: A theorem can't be wrong, C. Bond
  • Re: JSH: A theorem can't be wrong, Juuso Hukkanen
  • Re: A theorem can't be wrong, Tim Peters
• Question about integer partitions, neuron
  • Re: Question about integer partitions, The Qurqirish Dragon
    • Re: Question about integer partitions, neuron
      • Re: Question about integer partitions, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Question about integer partitions, neuron
      • Re: Question about integer partitions, Tim Peters
• Dimensionality Reduction to a Circle, Warren
  • Re: Dimensionality Reduction to a Circle, Rusty
    • Re: Dimensionality Reduction to a Circle, Warren
      • Re: Dimensionality Reduction to a Circle, Lee Rudolph
• Infinite, ligriv
  • Re: Infinite, Justin Young
  • Re: Infinite, William Elliot
  • Re: Infinite, Virgil
    • Re: Infinite, Ross A. Finlayson
• September (was, Re: This Week's Finds in Mathematical Physics (Week 214)), Lee Rudolph
• Pyramid Edges, ontadian
  • Re: Pyramid Edges, Amadeus Train-Owwell Zirconium
• Minimum triangle area, ontadian
• Continuity and Differentiation, William Elliot
  • Re: Continuity and Differentiation, Oscar Lanzi III
    • Re: Continuity and Differentiation, David C . Ullrich
• Complex Function Graphics for Mathematica, David Park
• Another Rational Canonical forms question.., Tony
• Fractional part, amalfi
  • Re: Fractional part, Nathan
  • Re: Fractional part, Dik T. Winter
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Fractional part, amalfi
• Who know nonlinear regression gamma?, Claudia
• Who knows nonlinear regression gamma?, Claudia
• nonlinear regression gamma, Claudia
• Extensions of continuous linear functions, José Carlos Santos
  • Re: Extensions of continuous linear functions, G. A. Edgar
    • Re: Extensions of continuous linear functions, The World Wide Wade
    • Re: Extensions of continuous linear functions, José Carlos Santos
• Quadratic Residue -- proof or example, mathedman
  • Re: Quadratic Residue -- proof or example, Bart Goddard
    • Re: Quadratic Residue -- proof or example, Arturo Magidin
• Re: Computer checking of math "proofs", Arturo Magidin
  • Re: Computer checking of math "proofs", Ed van der Meulen
    • Re: Computer checking of math "proofs", Gib Bogle
• mathematics and scienece of the 21-st century, Ed van der Meulen
  • Re: mathematics and scienece of the 21-st century, Ed van der Meulen
    • Re: mathematics and scienece of the 21-st century, Gib Bogle
• complex integral, mark12345
  • Re: complex integral, G. A. Edgar
  • Re: complex integral, achava
• Points in a sphere, ontadian
  • Re: Points in a sphere, Chip Eastham
• Shift operator in l^2, Valeriu Anisiu
  • Re: Shift operator in l^2, A N Niel
    • Re: Shift operator in l^2, Valeriu Anisiu
      • Re: Shift operator in l^2, Lee Rudolph
      • Re: Shift operator in l^2, The World Wide Wade
      • Re: Shift operator in l^2, Lee Rudolph
      • Re: Shift operator in l^2, Robert Israel
      • Re: Shift operator in l^2, Valeriu Anisiu
      • Re: Shift operator in l^2, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Shift operator in l^2, Valeriu Anisiu
• need help :(, Evolution
  • Re: need help :(, A N Niel
  • Re: need help :(, Coach
    • Re: need help :(, Evolution
• How log comes into math?, gimmytang
  • Re: How log comes into math?, Jim Spriggs
  • Re: How log comes into math?, Lawrence House
    • Re: How log comes into math?, Ed van der Meulen
    • Re: How log comes into math?, xmp
      • Re: How log comes into math?, Anthony Buckland
      • Re: How log comes into math?, Wayne Brown
    • Re: How log comes into math?, Dave L. Renfro
    • Re: How log comes into math?, Gib Bogle
• quadratic form with non-symmetric matrix..., Emme
  • Re: quadratic form with non-symmetric matrix..., Robert Israel
  • Re: quadratic form with non-symmetric matrix..., cacak5
• How does this maths "trick" work?, Cylindric
  • Re: How does this maths "trick" work?, Risto Lankinen
    • Re: How does this maths "trick" work?, Cylindric
  • Re: How does this maths "trick" work?, G.E. Ivey
• need help solving this, Alain Verghote
• (Reply) Question about the minesweeper consistency problem (NP-complete problems), Oscar
• compute the order of orbit, Li Yi
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • compute the order of orbit, Li Yi
    • Re: compute the order of orbit, Li Yi
      • Re: compute the order of orbit, Robin Chapman
      • Re: compute the order of orbit, Li Yi
      • Re: compute the order of orbit, Robin Chapman
• Where do I begin?, analysisman
  • Re: Where do I begin?, Proginoskes
    • Re: Where do I begin?, HERC777
  • Re: Where do I begin?, Proginoskes
  • Re: Where do I begin?, Virgil
    • Re: Where do I begin?, The Last Danish Pastry
    • Re: Where do I begin?, A N Niel
  • Re: Where do I begin?, David C . Ullrich
    • Re: Where do I begin?, William Elliot
      • Re: Where do I begin?, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Where do I begin?, Virgil
      • Re: Where do I begin?, William Elliot
      • Re: Where do I begin?, Virgil
      • Re: Where do I begin?, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Where do I begin?, Virgil
      • Re: Where do I begin?, Proginoskes
      • Re: Where do I begin?, David C . Ullrich
    • Re: Where do I begin?, Pubkeybreaker
      • Re: Where do I begin?, A N Niel
      • Re: Where do I begin?, Don Coppersmith
      • Re: Where do I begin?, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Where do I begin?, David C . Ullrich
  • Re: Where do I begin?, Don Coppersmith
    • Re: Where do I begin?, Don Coppersmith
      • Re: Where do I begin?, analysisman
      • Re: Where do I begin?, Don Coppersmith
  • Re: Where do I begin?, Peter
    • Re: Where do I begin?, analysisman
  • Re: Where do I begin?, Charlie
• Tridiagonal matrices, Eric
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Tridiagonal matrices, Eric
    • Re: Tridiagonal matrices, Zdislav V. Kovarik
• Integral, Opiate
  • Re: Integral, Proginoskes
    • Re: Integral, DP
  • Re: Integral, alain verghote
• Rational Canonical forms question...., Tony
• discrete mathematics, Ed van der Meulen
  • Re: discrete mathematics, Proginoskes
  • Re: discrete mathematics, flip
  • Re: discrete mathematics, Ed van der Meulen
    • Re: discrete mathematics, Ed van der Meulen
• Proof: The set C(R) of all continuous real-valued functions defined on R is a subspace of F(R)., A. Boom
  • Re: Proof: The set C(R) of all continuous real-valued functions defined on R is a subspace of F(R)., A. Boom
  • Re: Proof: The set C(R) of all continuous real-valued functions defined on R is a subspace of F(R)., Ted Hwa
    • Re: Proof: The set C(R) of all continuous real-valued functions defined on R is a subspace of F(R)., A. Boom
      • Re: Proof: The set C(R) of all continuous real-valued functions defined on R is a subspace of F(R)., David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Proof: The set C(R) of all continuous real-valued functions defined on R is a subspace of F(R)., A. Boom
• JSH: Brainstorming over, for now, jstevh
  • Re: JSH: Brainstorming over, for now, Nathan
  • Re: JSH: Brainstorming over, for now, Juuso Hukkanen
    • Re: JSH: Brainstorming over, for now, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Brainstorming over, for now, flip
  • Re: JSH: Brainstorming over, for now, bryant_j_j
  • Re: JSH: Brainstorming over, for now, C. Bond
  • Re: Brainstorming over, for now, Richard Henry
  • Re: Brainstorming over, for now, headly
  • Message not available
    • Re: JSH: Brainstorming over, for now, Juuso Hukkanen
      • Re: JSH: Brainstorming over, for now, Gib Bogle
      • Re: JSH: Brainstorming over, for now, David Kastrup
      • Re: JSH: Brainstorming over, for now, Nora Baron
      • Re: JSH: Brainstorming over, for now, Gib Bogle
      • Re: JSH: Brainstorming over, for now, Tim Peters
  • Message not available
    • Re: JSH: Brainstorming over, for now, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: JSH: Brainstorming over, for now, Gib Bogle
  • Re: JSH: Brainstorming over, for now, Wayne Brown
  • Re: JSH: Brainstorming over, for now, W. Dale Hall
• need help solving this., ames_kin@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: need help solving this., Gerry Myerson
  • Re: need help solving this., Torsten Hennig
    • Re: need help solving this., ames_kin@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: need help solving this., alain verghote
• correlation coefficient rational or irrational?, NoName NoSlogan
  • Re: correlation coefficient rational or irrational?, Richard Tobin
  • Re: correlation coefficient rational or irrational?, Gerry Myerson
• Conditionally convergent series, Amanda
  • Re: Conditionally convergent series, Gerry Myerson
    • Re: Conditionally convergent series, Keith A. Lewis
      • Re: Conditionally convergent series, The World Wide Wade
  • Re: Conditionally convergent series, David C . Ullrich
    • Re: Conditionally convergent series, Lawrence House
    • Re: Conditionally convergent series, Amanda
  • Re: Conditionally convergent series, Torsten Hennig
  • Re: Conditionally convergent series, Ed van der Meulen
  • Re: Conditionally convergent series, Robert Israel
• Ever hear of this -- it's not homework, michael_bennettxyz
  • Re: Ever hear of this -- it's not homework, Daniel W. Johnson
• Point in a sphere, ontadian
  • Re: Point in a sphere, Amadeus Train-Owwell Zirconium
  • Re: Point in a sphere, Keith A. Lewis
    • Re: Point in a sphere, Keith A. Lewis
  • Re: Point in a sphere, Gerry Myerson
  • Re: Point in a sphere, Ed van der Meulen
• F(N)=The number of primes that do not divide N, davecornwell
  • Re: F(N)=The number of primes that do not divide N, Daniel W. Johnson
    • Re: F(N)=The number of primes that do not divide N, davecornwell
      • Re: F(N)=The number of primes that do not divide N, Gerry Myerson
      • Re: F(N)=The number of primes that do not divide N, davecornwell
  • Re: F(N)=The number of primes that do not divide N, Pubkeybreaker
  • Re: F(N)=The number of primes that do not divide N, Keith A. Lewis
• Re: Why do we have the natural numbers?, Lawrence House
• Hilbert Scmidt norm need help with proof, egilbae
  • Re: Hilbert Scmidt norm need help with proof, The World Wide Wade
• Re: A New (And Slightly Stupid) Set Theory, fishfry
  • Re: A New (And Slightly Stupid) Set Theory, The Ghost In The Machine
    • Re: A New (And Slightly Stupid) Set Theory, Daniel W. Johnson
      • Re: A New (And Slightly Stupid) Set Theory, The Ghost In The Machine
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: A New (And Slightly Stupid) Set Theory, ken quirici
    • Re: A New (And Slightly Stupid) Set Theory, The Ghost In The Machine
  • Re: A New (And Slightly Stupid) Set Theory, Jim Spriggs
  • Re: A New (And Slightly Stupid) Set Theory, HERC777
    • Re: A New (And Slightly Stupid) Set Theory, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: A New (And Slightly Stupid) Set Theory, HERC777
      • Re: A New (And Slightly Stupid) Set Theory, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: A New (And Slightly Stupid) Set Theory, HERC777
• convergence of functions and inverses, beebee
  • Re: convergence of functions and inverses, José Carlos Santos
    • Re: convergence of functions and inverses, beebee
      • Re: convergence of functions and inverses, Dave Rusin
• SDE-Vasicek Modell-Solution, 1webpanter
• rank & eigenvalues, tamiry
  • Re: rank & eigenvalues, Alois Steindl
    • Re: rank & eigenvalues, tamiry
      • Re: rank & eigenvalues, Alois Steindl
• Is there a Platonistic interpretation of the empty set?, Mike H
  • Re: Is there a Platonistic interpretation of the empty set?, fishfry
    • Re: Is there a Platonistic interpretation of the empty set?, Toni Lassila
    • Re: Is there a Platonistic interpretation of the empty set?, Zdislav V. Kovarik
      • Re: Is there a Platonistic interpretation of the empty set?, William Elliot
      • Re: Is there a Platonistic interpretation of the empty set?, Dave Rusin
  • Re: Is there a Platonistic interpretation of the empty set?, Hero
  • Re: Is there a Platonistic interpretation of the empty set?, examachine
  • Re: Is there a Platonistic interpretation of the empty set?, Ioannis
  • Re: Is there a Platonistic interpretation of the empty set?, Gerry Myerson
    • Re: Is there a Platonistic interpretation of the empty set?, William Elliot
  • Phenomena and noumena, Mike H
    • Re: Phenomena and noumena, Hero
      • Re: Phenomena and noumena, Dave Seaman
      • Re: Phenomena and noumena, Hero
      • Re: Phenomena and noumena, Dave Seaman
      • Re: Phenomena and noumena, Hero
      • Re: Phenomena and noumena, Dave Seaman
      • Re: Phenomena and noumena, Ross A. Finlayson
      • Re: Phenomena and noumena, Hero
  • Re: Is there a Platonistic interpretation of the empty set?, Rainer Rosenthal
• Good reduction of Jacobians of twisted Fermat curves, Thomas
  • Re: Good reduction of Jacobians of twisted Fermat curves, Amadeus Train-Owwell Zirconium
• JSH: SFT is boring, N. Silver
  • Re: JSH: SFT is boring, José Carlos Santos
    • Re: JSH: SFT is boring, N. Silver
      • Re: JSH: SFT is boring, José Carlos Santos
      • Re: JSH: SFT is boring, Larry Hammick
      • Re: JSH: SFT is boring, Lash Rambo
      • Re: JSH: SFT is boring, Larry Hammick
• Back Online, Webmanneken
  • Re: Back Online, William Elliot
• matrix problem with rank, Li Yi
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • matrix problem with rank, Li Yi
  • matrix problem with rank, Li Yi
    • Re: matrix problem with rank, Alois Steindl
      • Re: matrix problem with rank, Li Yi
    • Re: matrix problem with rank, Randy Poe
      • Re: matrix problem with rank, Li Yi
      • Re: matrix problem with rank, Randy Poe
      • Re: matrix problem with rank, Dik T. Winter
    • Re: matrix problem with rank, Torsten Hennig
• a matrix problem with rank, Li Yi
• Correct proof involving relation theorem?, A. Boom
  • Re: Correct proof involving relation theorem?, David C . Ullrich
    • Re: Correct proof involving relation theorem?, A. Boom
• Your account #3M7888, "Adrian Corbin"
• Finite Groups Book, Tonico
• Re: Surrogate factoring, mapping, hyperbolas, Jesse F. Hughes
• Re: Proof against a corrupted math society, Jesse F. Hughes
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Proof against a corrupted math society, Michael Stemper
  • Re: Proof against a corrupted math society, Jesse F. Hughes
    • Re: Proof against a corrupted math society, Lee Rudolph
• nested closed set theorem for R^n, vsgdp
  • Re: nested closed set theorem for R^n, Stuart M Newberger
• Vector spaces and calculus, A. Boom
  • Re: Vector spaces and calculus, Willem H. de Boer
    • Re: Vector spaces and calculus, A. Boom
      • Re: Vector spaces and calculus, Willem H. de Boer
      • Re: Vector spaces and calculus, Toni Lassila
      • Re: Vector spaces and calculus, A. Boom
      • Re: Vector spaces and calculus, Dave Rusin
  • Re: Vector spaces and calculus, Hagen
    • Re: Vector spaces and calculus, A. Boom
      • Re: Vector spaces and calculus, Willem H. de Boer
      • Re: Vector spaces and calculus, A. Boom
• Re: National security, Tim Peters
• Linear algebra question, Eric
  • Re: Linear algebra question, Virgil
• Writing calculus notes, order of limit definitions, A. Boom
  • Re: Writing calculus notes, order of limit definitions, Ted Hwa
    • Re: Writing calculus notes, order of limit definitions, A. Boom
• Re: SF: National security, Justin
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: SF: National security, Juuso Hukkanen
  • Re: SF: National security, Juuso Hukkanen
  • Re: SF: National security, Juuso Hukkanen
  • Re: SF: National security, Juuso Hukkanen
  • Re: SF: National security, Juuso Hukkanen
  • Re: SF: National security, Juuso Hukkanen
    • Re: SF: National security, Tim Peters
      • Re: SF: National security, Juuso Hukkanen
    • Re: SF: National security, Proginoskes
• Re: SF: Symmetry, practical matters, social realities, Amadeus Train-Owwell Zirconium
  • Re: SF: Symmetry, practical matters, social realities, Amadeus Train-Owwell Zirconium
• Every square integrable function has integral representation?, mathlover
  • Re: Every square integrable function has integral representation?, William Elliot
    • Re: Every square integrable function has integral representation?, Robert Israel
      • Re: Every square integrable function has integral representation?, G. A. Edgar
• difficult problems for us mathematicians., Ed van der Meulen
  • Re: difficult problems for us mathematicians., A. Boom
• Types of functions and relations, A. Boom
  • Re: Types of functions and relations, Gerry Myerson
    • Re: Types of functions and relations, A. Boom
      • Re: Types of functions and relations, Gerry Myerson
  • Re: Types of functions and relations, James Buddenhagen
    • Re: Types of functions and relations, A. Boom
  • Re: Types of functions and relations, Michael Stemper
    • Re: Types of functions and relations, Michael Stemper
    • Re: Types of functions and relations, A. Boom
• sequence of continuous functions, Tim
  • Re: sequence of continuous functions, William Elliot
    • Re: sequence of continuous functions, Tim
  • Re: sequence of continuous functions, William Elliot
• Continuity, Tim
  • Re: Continuity, William Elliot
  • Re: Continuity, David C . Ullrich
  • Re: Continuity, David C . Ullrich
    • Re: Continuity, Tim
      • Re: Continuity, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Continuity, Tim
      • Re: Continuity, Ted Hwa
      • Re: Continuity, Dave L. Renfro
      • Re: Continuity, N. Silver
      • Re: Continuity, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Continuity, William Elliot
      • Re: Continuity, N. Silver
      • Re: Continuity, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Continuity, N. Silver
      • Re: Continuity, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Continuity, N. Silver
      • Re: Continuity, Jim Spriggs
      • Re: Continuity, N. Silver
      • Re: Continuity, Jim Spriggs
      • Re: Continuity, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Continuity, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Continuity, N. Silver
      • Re: Continuity, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Continuity, N. Silver
      • Re: Continuity, David C . Ullrich
• good text for linear algebra?, mk
  • Re: good text for linear algebra?, Dirk Van de moortel
  • Re: good text for linear algebra?, Willem H. de Boer
    • Re: good text for linear algebra?, Dave Rusin
      • Re: good text for linear algebra?, Robert Israel
  • Re: good text for linear algebra?, G. A. Edgar
    • Re: good text for linear algebra?, Lee Rudolph
    • Re: good text for linear algebra?, Chip Eastham
      • Re: good text for linear algebra?, xmp
      • Re: good text for linear algebra?, Gerry Myerson
    • Re: good text for linear algebra?, Robert Israel
      • Re: good text for linear algebra?, Robin Chapman
      • Re: good text for linear algebra?, G. A. Edgar
    • Re: good text for linear algebra?, Robin Chapman
      • Re: good text for linear algebra?, G. A. Edgar
      • Re: good text for linear algebra?, Torkel Franzen
      • Re: good text for linear algebra?, denis feldmann
      • Re: good text for linear algebra?, Robin Chapman
      • Re: good text for linear algebra?, G. A. Edgar
      • Re: good text for linear algebra?,
      • Re: good text for linear algebra?, Robin Chapman
      • Re: good text for linear algebra?, G. A. Edgar
      • Re: good text for linear algebra?, Dave Rusin
      • Re: good text for linear algebra?, David C . Ullrich
• Strength of Sub-division question., Drew Jones
  • Re: Strength of Sub-division question., achava
    • Re: Strength of Sub-division question., Drew Jones
• proofs question, Island11111
  • Re: proofs question, Arturo Magidin
  • Re: proofs question, Peter L. Montgomery
    • Re: proofs question, Island11111
      • Re: proofs question, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: proofs question, Island11111
      • Re: proofs question, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: proofs question, Island11111
      • Re: proofs question, Peter L. Montgomery
      • Re: proofs question, Island11111
  • Re: proofs question, hale
• How to compute the determinant of a special type Toeplitz matrix, Bowon Lee
  • Re: How to compute the determinant of a special type Toeplitz matrix, Carl K. Woll
    • Re: How to compute the determinant of a special type Toeplitz matrix, Bowon Lee
      • Re: How to compute the determinant of a special type Toeplitz matrix, Bowon Lee
• Can someone answer me this?, bugaboo171
  • Re: Can someone answer me this?, Arturo Magidin
  • Re: Can someone answer me this?, Arturo Magidin
    • Re: Can someone answer me this?, bugaboo171
      • Re: Can someone answer me this?, gerard46
      • Re: Can someone answer me this?, bugaboo171
      • Re: Can someone answer me this?, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: Can someone answer me this?, Daniel W. Johnson
      • Re: Can someone answer me this?, bugaboo171
      • Re: Can someone answer me this?, bugaboo171
  • Re: Can someone answer me this?, Barry Schwarz
• Approximation by linear combinations of natural powers of $x$, Bublik
  • Re: Approximation by linear combinations of natural powers of $x$, Gerry Myerson
    • Re: Approximation by linear combinations of natural powers of $x$, Bublik
      • Re: Approximation by linear combinations of natural powers of $x$, Gerry Myerson
  • Re: Approximation by linear combinations of natural powers of $x$, Bublik
• Probability question, Brett Trost
  • Re: Probability question, M.J.T. Guy
  • Re: Probability question, Tino
  • Re: Probability question, Tomas Hokenberi
  • Re: Probability question, Peter L. Montgomery
• A link between the Goldbach Conjecture, Riemann's Zeta function and Dirichlet's Functions, davecornwell
• Groups of order 32, Van
  • Re: Groups of order 32, Van
    • Re: Groups of order 32, Jim Heckman
      • Re: Groups of order 32,
      • Re: Groups of order 32, Van
  • Re: Groups of order 32, Jim Heckman
    • Re: Groups of order 32, Van
      • Re: Groups of order 32, Van
      • Re: Groups of order 32, Jim Heckman
      • Re: Groups of order 32, Jim Heckman
      • Re: Groups of order 32, Van
  • Re: Groups of order 32, Van
• Primitive roots and squares, Toni Lassila
  • Re: Primitive roots and squares, Robin Chapman
  • Re: Primitive roots and squares, Hanford Carr
• Re: Factoring problem and the SFT, Juuso Hukkanen
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Factoring problem and the SFT, Juuso Hukkanen
  • Re: Factoring problem and the SFT, Tim Peters
  • Re: Factoring problem and the SFT, Juuso Hukkanen
  • Re: Factoring problem and the SFT, jankrihau
  • Re: Factoring problem and the SFT, Juuso Hukkanen
    • Re: Factoring problem and the SFT, Proginoskes
    • Re: Factoring problem and the SFT, bryant_j_j
  • Re: Factoring problem and the SFT, Juuso Hukkanen
    • Re: Factoring problem and the SFT, jstevh
  • Re: Factoring problem and the SFT, Tim Peters
    • Re: Factoring problem and the SFT, jstevh
      • Re: Factoring problem and the SFT, Proginoskes
      • Re: Factoring problem and the SFT, jstevh
    • Re: Factoring problem and the SFT, Rick Decker
      • Re: Factoring problem and the SFT, David Kastrup
  • Re: Factoring problem and the SFT, Jesse F. Hughes
  • Re: Factoring problem and the SFT, Juuso Hukkanen
• JSH: SFT and integers, jstevh
  • Re: JSH: SFT and integers, bryant_j_j
  • Re: JSH: SFT and integers, Juuso Hukkanen
    • Re: JSH: SFT and integers, Juuso Hukkanen
  • Re: JSH: SFT and integers, Larry Lard
  • Re: SFT and integers, N. Silver
  • Re: SFT and integers, Tim Peters
  • Re: JSH: SFT and integers, C. Bond
  • Re: JSH: SFT and integers, Justin
    • Re: JSH: SFT and integers, David Kastrup
  • Re: JSH: SFT and integers, José Carlos Santos
  • Re: SFT and integers, flip
  • Message not available
    • Re: JSH: SFT and integers, Proginoskes
  • Message not available
    • Re: JSH: SFT and integers, Proginoskes
• L'Hospital for polynomes?, Hauke Reddmann
• field extension, Andreas Thom
  • Re: field extension, rupertmccallum
• Question about the minesweeper consistency problem (NP-complete problems), Oscar
  • Re: Question about the minesweeper consistency problem (NP-complete problems), Harri Haanpaa
    • Re: Question about the minesweeper consistency problem (NP-complete problems), Oscar
      • Re: Question about the minesweeper consistency problem (NP-complete problems), Lasse
      • Re: Question about the minesweeper consistency problem (NP-complete problems), Proginoskes
      • Re: Question about the minesweeper consistency problem (NP-complete problems), Lasse
      • Re: Question about the minesweeper consistency problem (NP-complete problems), Proginoskes
      • Re: Question about the minesweeper consistency problem (NP-complete problems), Lasse
      • Re: Question about the minesweeper consistency problem (NP-complete problems), Proginoskes
      • Re: Question about the minesweeper consistency problem (NP-complete problems), Nathan
      • Re: Question about the minesweeper consistency problem (NP-complete problems), Lasse
• Numerical evaluation of a contour integral, bryant_j_j
  • Message not available
    • Re: Numerical evaluation of a contour integral, bryant_j_j
      • Re: Numerical evaluation of a contour integral, Torsten Hennig
      • Re: Numerical evaluation of a contour integral, bryant_j_j
      • Re: Numerical evaluation of a contour integral, Torsten Hennig
      • Re: Numerical evaluation of a contour integral, bryant_j_j
      • Re: Numerical evaluation of a contour integral, Robert Israel
      • Re: Numerical evaluation of a contour integral, bryant_j_j
  • Re: Numerical evaluation of a contour integral, Robert Israel
• Are k spaces compactly generated?, William Elliot
  • Re: Are k spaces compactly generated?, Zundark
• Re: SF: Abstracted SFT, issue of triviality, Jesse F. Hughes
  • Re: SF: Abstracted SFT, issue of triviality, David C . Ullrich
    • Re: SF: Abstracted SFT, issue of triviality, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: SF: Abstracted SFT, issue of triviality, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: SF: Abstracted SFT, issue of triviality, iainking@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: SF: Abstracted SFT, issue of triviality, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: SF: Abstracted SFT, issue of triviality, David Kastrup
      • Re: SF: Abstracted SFT, issue of triviality, Amadeus Train-Owwell Zirconium
• Axiomatic derivation of complex number system, schoenfeld1
  • Re: Axiomatic derivation of complex number system, Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
    • Re: Axiomatic derivation of complex number system, schoenfeld1
      • Re: Axiomatic derivation of complex number system, A N Niel
  • Re: Axiomatic derivation of complex number system, alain verghote
• Re: Sword of Damocles, Tim Peters
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Sword of Damocles, Larry Hammick
    • Re: Sword of Damocles, Proginoskes
• 1-1 curve with lebesque measure greater than 0, analysisman
  • Re: 1-1 curve with lebesque measure greater than 0, analysisman
  • Re: 1-1 curve with lebesque measure greater than 0, Jon Slaughter
    • Re: 1-1 curve with lebesque measure greater than 0, David C . Ullrich
  • Re: 1-1 curve with lebesque measure greater than 0, G. A. Edgar
  • Re: 1-1 curve with lebesque measure greater than 0, Daniel Grubb
    • Re: 1-1 curve with lebesque measure greater than 0, analysisman
  • Re: 1-1 curve with lebesque measure greater than 0, David C . Ullrich
    • Re: 1-1 curve with lebesque measure greater than 0, Zdislav V. Kovarik
      • Re: 1-1 curve with lebesque measure greater than 0, David C . Ullrich
  • Re: 1-1 curve with lebesque measure greater than 0, Dave L. Renfro
    • Re: 1-1 curve with lebesque measure greater than 0, Lee Rudolph
      • Re: 1-1 curve with lebesque measure greater than 0, Dave L. Renfro
      • Re: 1-1 curve with lebesque measure greater than 0, Lee Rudolph
• Re: JSH: Sword of Damocles, David Kastrup
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: JSH: Sword of Damocles, jshsucks
  • Re: JSH: Sword of Damocles, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: JSH: Sword of Damocles, Justin
    • Re: JSH: Sword of Damocles, jstevh
      • Re: JSH: Sword of Damocles, jshsucks
  • Re: JSH: Sword of Damocles, C. Bond
    • Re: JSH: Sword of Damocles, Proginoskes
      • Re: JSH: Sword of Damocles, litsohate
      • Re: JSH: Sword of Damocles, Wayne Brown
  • Re: JSH: Sword of Damocles, Gib Bogle
• det(A - kI) = 0, vsgdp
  • Re: det(A - kI) = 0, Ryan Reich
• linear transformations, vsgdp
  • Re: linear transformations, Proginoskes
• Another question about weird differentials, Ken Honda
  • Re: Another question about weird differentials, Stuart M Newberger
• Gateaux differential help?, garrettbaird2
• Tensors without choice?, Stephen White
  • Re: Tensors without choice?, Robin Chapman
• irrationality of e, Collins Williams
  • Re: irrationality of e, Jim Spriggs
  • Re: irrationality of e, Nathan
    • Re: irrationality of e, Michael Stemper
      • Re: irrationality of e, Nathan
      • Re: irrationality of e, Daniel W. Johnson
  • Re: irrationality of e, Ron Sperber
  • Re: irrationality of e, Daniel W. Johnson
  • Re: irrationality of e, Zdislav V. Kovarik
  • Re: irrationality of e, Will Twentyman
    • Re: irrationality of e, A N Niel
      • Re: irrationality of e, r.e.s.
      • Re: irrationality of e, Will Twentyman
  • Re: irrationality of e, Christian Bau
  • Re: irrationality of e, Brian VanPelt
  • Re: irrationality of e, rich burge
  • Re: irrationality of e, david petry
• I don't believe in many ideas of mathematicians, we have to be critical., Ed van der Meulen
  • Re: I don't believe in many ideas of mathematicians, we have to be critical., flip
  • Re: I don't believe in many ideas of mathematicians, we have to be critical., Rick Decker
  • Re: I don't believe in many ideas of mathematicians, we have to be critical., mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: I don't believe in many ideas of mathematicians, we have to be critical., James Hess
  • Re: I don't believe in many ideas of mathematicians, we have to be critical., Daniel Ryan
    • Re: I don't believe in many ideas of mathematicians, we have to be critical., Eckard Blumschein
      • Re: I don't believe in many ideas of mathematicians, we have to be critical., Lynn Kurtz
      • Re: I don't believe in many ideas of mathematicians, we have to be critical., Eckard Blumschein
      • Re: I don't believe in many ideas of mathematicians, we have to be critical., fishfry
      • Re: I don't believe in many ideas of mathematicians, we have to be critical., Ed van der Meulen
      • Re: I don't believe in many ideas of mathematicians, we have to be critical., Robin Chapman
      • Re: I don't believe in many ideas of mathematicians, we have to be critical., Ed van der Meulen
      • Re: I don't believe in many ideas of mathematicians, we have to be critical., Robin Chapman
  • Re: I don't believe in many ideas of mathematicians, we have to be critical., Tonico
  • Re: I don't believe in many ideas of mathematicians, we have to be critical., David C . Ullrich
  • Re: I don't believe in many ideas of mathematicians, we have to be critical., Ed van der Meulen
  • Re: I don't believe in many ideas of mathematicians, we have to be critical., Ed van der Meulen
  • Re: I don't believe in many ideas of mathematicians, we have to be critical., Ed van der Meulen
    • Re: I don't believe in many ideas of mathematicians, we have to be critical., Lynn Kurtz
  • Re: I don't believe in many ideas of mathematicians, we have to be critical., Ed van der Meulen
    • Re: I don't believe in many ideas of mathematicians, we have to be critical., Amadeus Train-Owwell Zirconium
      • Re: I don't believe in many ideas of mathematicians, we have to be critical., Ed van der Meulen
      • Re: I don't believe in many ideas of mathematicians, we have to be critical., Robin Chapman
  • Re: I don't believe in many ideas of mathematicians, we have to be critical., Ed van der Meulen
    • Re: I don't believe in many ideas of mathematicians, we have to be critical., Torkel Franzen
      • Re: I don't believe in many ideas of mathematicians, we have to be critical., Ed van der Meulen
      • Re: I don't believe in many ideas of mathematicians, we have to be critical., Torkel Franzen
• Re: maximum limit, continuity and integrability 2, Zdislav V. Kovarik
• mathmatical recreation: What is Sin(Sin(x)) ?, rwmm415
  • Re: mathmatical recreation: What is Sin(Sin(x)) ?, Phil Freedenberg
    • Re: mathmatical recreation: What is Sin(Sin(x)) ?, Rick Decker
  • Re: mathmatical recreation: What is Sin(Sin(x)) ?, flip
  • Re: mathmatical recreation: What is Sin(Sin(x)) ?, Robert Israel
• Need help on a simple quadratic equation!, Eyon
  • Re: Need help on a simple quadratic equation!, Arturo Magidin
    • Re: Need help on a simple quadratic equation!, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: Need help on a simple quadratic equation!, Eyon
      • Re: Need help on a simple quadratic equation!, Virgil
      • Re: Need help on a simple quadratic equation!, Eyon
      • Re: Need help on a simple quadratic equation!, Daniel W. Johnson
    • Re: Need help on a simple quadratic equation!, Alex Hunsley
  • Re: Need help on a simple quadratic equation!, Daniel W. Johnson
  • Re: Need help on a simple quadratic equation!, Ken Pledger
    • Re: Need help on a simple quadratic equation!, Eyon
• asymptotic matrix, Sami
  • Re: asymptotic matrix, Robert Israel
• Embedding of GL(n/r,q^r) into GL(n,q), s
  • Re: Embedding of GL(n/r,q^r) into GL(n,q),
• Need help for searching "error upper bound" in my circuit design problem., Liming Xiu
• An compound interest question using Differential equation to solve., joenchinghkg
  • Re: An compound interest question using Differential equation to solve., Lynn Kurtz
  • Re: An compound interest question using Differential equation to solve., Lawrence House
• Question about sets of functions, agapito6314
  • Re: Question about sets of functions, The World Wide Wade
    • Re: Question about sets of functions, Stephen J. Herschkorn
      • Re: Question about sets of functions, Daniel W. Johnson
      • Re: Question about sets of functions, agapito6314
      • Re: Question about sets of functions, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: Question about sets of functions, agapito6314
      • Re: Question about sets of functions, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: Question about sets of functions, The World Wide Wade
      • Re: Question about sets of functions, The World Wide Wade
• Re: JSH: Refusing to Test, Fear of Failure, Juuso Hukkanen
  • Re: JSH: Refusing to Test, Fear of Failure, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: maximum limit, continuity and integrability, The World Wide Wade
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: maximum limit, continuity and integrability, Zdislav V. Kovarik
• family of circles question, evanmason
  • Re: family of circles question, A N Niel
• Hilbert spaces, chris
  • Re: Hilbert spaces, Ken Pledger
    • Re: Hilbert spaces, chris
      • Re: Hilbert spaces, Stuart M Newberger
      • Re: Hilbert spaces, chris
• hestorical development in maths, advait.chhatre@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: hestorical development in maths, Ken Pledger
  • Re: hestorical development in maths, Jim Spriggs
• matrix proof, Robert
  • Re: matrix proof, Arturo Magidin
    • Re: matrix proof, Li Yi
• vector space of sets..., Stephen White
  • Re: vector space of sets..., Arturo Magidin
    • Re: vector space of sets..., Stephen White
  • Re: vector space of sets..., A N Niel
  • Re: vector space of sets..., Stuart M Newberger
    • Re: vector space of sets..., Stephen White
      • Re: vector space of sets..., Stuart M Newberger
• correction on calculus problem, Robert
  • Re: correction on calculus problem, Arturo Magidin
• group isomorphism problem, Li Yi
  • Re: group isomorphism problem, Arturo Magidin
  • Re: group isomorphism problem, Bart Jans
• Re: Mathematics, Pseudomathematics, Artificial Intelligence, Milo Gardner
• Epistemology 999: Remedial was Re: Epistemology 202: Advanced Topics, Robin Chapman
• experimental data and time series analysis, paul
• an area problem, Li Yi
  • Re: an area problem, A N Niel
    • Re: an area problem, Li Yi
      • Re: an area problem, Randy Poe
      • Re: an area problem, Li Yi
      • Re: an area problem, Li Yi
      • Re: an area problem, Lynn Kurtz
      • Re: an area problem, Li Yi
  • Re: an area problem, Rob Pratt
• Does a spline remain a spline after perpective projection?, Satya
  • Re: Does a spline remain a spline after perpective projection?, Rob Johnson
• Question (again) about the group of Mobius Transformations, dalthman
• calculus differential problem, Robert
  • Re: calculus differential problem, William Elliot
  • Re: calculus differential problem, Narcoleptic Insomniac
    • Re: calculus differential problem, Lynn Kurtz
      • Re: calculus differential problem, Narcoleptic Insomniac
• Stacking not packing, piling not tiling, The Last Danish Pastry
  • Re: Stacking not packing, piling not tiling, The Last Danish Pastry
• Your account #913M7930, "Donnie Bellamy"
• Re: roots (zeros) of a complex function, Gabriel Cardi
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: roots (zeros) of a complex function, Robert Israel
• Algebraic closed fields aren't countable., William Elliot
  • Re: Algebraic closed fields aren't countable., Jyrki Lahtonen
    • Re: Algebraic closed fields aren't countable., William Elliot
  • Re: Algebraic closed fields aren't countable., Hagen
• Are there analytic functions that are periodic for only unique values, and not others?, A. Boom
  • Re: Are there analytic functions that are periodic for only unique values, and not others?, Gerry Myerson
    • Re: Are there analytic functions that are periodic for only unique values, and not others?, William Elliot
  • Re: Are there analytic functions that are periodic for only unique values, and not others?, alain verghote
  • Re: Are there analytic functions that are periodic for only unique values, and not others?, alain verghote
• analysis proof validity, vsgdp
  • Re: analysis proof validity, Justin Young
• start me off (again) #3b, puppetz
  • Re: start me off (again) #3b, Proginoskes
    • Re: start me off (again) #3b, puppetz
      • Re: start me off (again) #3b, Proginoskes
      • Re: start me off (again) #3b, puppetz
      • Re: start me off (again) #3b, Proginoskes
      • Re: start me off (again) #3b, puppetz
• infinity problem, Vec
  • Re: infinity problem, William Elliot
  • Re: infinity problem, Matt Gutting
    • Re: infinity problem, Robin Chapman
      • Re: infinity problem, Matt Gutting
      • Re: infinity problem, Robin Chapman
  • Re: infinity problem, Li Yi
  • Re: infinity problem, DP
    • Re: infinity problem, Robin Chapman
      • Re: infinity problem, DP
      • Re: infinity problem, Toni Lassila
    • Re: infinity problem, Tim Peters
      • Re: infinity problem, DP
  • Re: infinity problem, Zdislav V. Kovarik
    • Re: infinity problem, Dan Piponi
      • Re: infinity problem, Zdislav V. Kovarik
  • Re: infinity problem, JEMebius
• Definition of Principal Eigenvector, Nathan Gilbert
  • Re: Definition of Principal Eigenvector, Klueless
    • Re: Definition of Principal Eigenvector, Nathan Gilbert
• Extreme points of a convex set in R^n, TCL
  • Re: Extreme points of a convex set in R^n, Proginoskes
    • Re: Extreme points of a convex set in R^n, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Extreme points of a convex set in R^n, Proginoskes
    • Re: Extreme points of a convex set in R^n, Herman Rubin
      • Re: Extreme points of a convex set in R^n, Proginoskes
  • Re: Extreme points of a convex set in R^n, Robert Israel
  • Re: Extreme points of a convex set in R^n, G. A. Edgar
• Haar measure computations, Trav
  • Re: Haar measure computations, Herman Rubin
• MatLab randn and Simulation Step Numbers, Matthew Brenneman
• Differentiability at a point: understanding starting from set theory; request for help., A. Boom
  • Re: Differentiability at a point: understanding starting from set theory; request for help., Mkajuma
    • Re: Differentiability at a point: understanding starting from set theory; request for help., A. Boom
  • Re: Differentiability at a point: understanding starting from set theory; request for help., cbrown
    • Re: Differentiability at a point: understanding starting from set theory; request for help., A. Boom
      • Re: Differentiability at a point: understanding starting from set theory; request for help., Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
      • Re: Differentiability at a point: understanding starting from set theory; request for help., A. Boom
      • Re: Differentiability at a point: understanding starting from set theory; request for help., cbrown
      • Re: Differentiability at a point: understanding starting from set theory; request for help., A. Boom
  • Re: Differentiability at a point: understanding starting from set theory; request for help., Lawrence House
• Save hundreds every month on low rates, "Graciela Kirkland"
• Basic de Rham question..., Tony
  • Re: Basic de Rham question..., Trav
• draw PDF curve, ZHANG Yan
  • Re: draw PDF curve, glenbarnett
  • Re: draw PDF curve, Torsten Hennig
  • Re: draw PDF curve, Herman Rubin
• Re: some "new" Zeta function relationships, Gerry Myerson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: some "new" Zeta function relationships, G. A. Edgar
• Mathematical fraud?, Jim Spriggs
  • Re: Mathematical fraud?, Chip Eastham
    • Re: Mathematical fraud?, Jim Spriggs
    • Re: Mathematical fraud?, Torkel Franzen
      • Re: Mathematical fraud?, Robert Kolker
    • Re: Mathematical fraud?, A N Niel
    • Re: Mathematical fraud?, Robert Kolker
      • Re: Mathematical fraud?, Herman Rubin
  • Re: Mathematical fraud?, flip
    • Re: Mathematical fraud?, Gerry Myerson
      • Re: Mathematical fraud?, Jim Spriggs
      • Re: Mathematical fraud?, Gerry Myerson
      • Re: Mathematical fraud?, Jim Spriggs
      • Re: Mathematical fraud?, G. A. Edgar
      • Re: Mathematical fraud?, Robert Kolker
    • Re: Mathematical fraud?, Robert Kolker
      • Re: Mathematical fraud?, Jim Spriggs
  • Re: Mathematical fraud?, Larry Hammick
  • Re: Mathematical fraud?, David McAnally
    • Re: Mathematical fraud?, Jim Spriggs
      • Re: Mathematical fraud?, a1jrj@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Mathematical fraud?, Ryan Reich
  • Re: Mathematical fraud?, Robert Kolker
  • Re: Mathematical fraud?, T Block
  • Re: Mathematical fraud?, Herman Rubin
    • Re: Mathematical fraud?, Proginoskes
• Digamma on imaginary argument, Jon Slaughter
  • Re: Digamma on imaginary argument, David W . Cantrell
• Localization question..., Tony
  • Re: Localization question..., Tonico
• parametrized cone, Zdislav V. Kovarik
  • Re: parametrized cone, Virgil
    • Re: parametrized cone, Zdislav V. Kovarik
  • Re: parametrized cone, john_ramsden
• Re: JSH: Image check, Amadeus Train-Owwell Zirconium
• Marginal Density Function (SFA, Stochastic Frontier Analysis), Andre Christ
• free math papers archive??, xmp
  • Re: free math papers archive??, David M Einstein
  • Re: free math papers archive??, Emmanuel Romeo-de Louvigny
• Proof of PID with field of fractions, jamesdickerson00
  • Re: Proof of PID with field of fractions, Arturo Magidin
• Basic set question, agapito6314
  • Re: Basic set question, Arturo Magidin
  • Re: Basic set question, Hanford Carr
    • Re: Basic set question, Dave Seaman
      • Re: Basic set question, Hanford Carr
      • Re: Basic set question, Dave Seaman
      • Re: Basic set question, Hanford Carr
      • Re: Basic set question, Justin Young
      • Re: Basic set question, Hanford Carr
      • Re: Basic set question, Dave Seaman
  • Re: Basic set question, Stephen J. Herschkorn
    • Re: Basic set question, agapito6314
      • Re: Basic set question,
  • Re: Basic set question, Randy Poe
  • Re: Basic set question, Virgil
  • Re: Basic set question, Owen
• geometric series and limits, jaspal
• PDE problem, Costin
  • Re: PDE problem, M.J.T. Guy
• 2 algebra questions..., Babak Arjmandnia
  • Re: 2 algebra questions..., Arturo Magidin
  • Re: 2 algebra questions..., José Carlos Santos
    • Re: 2 algebra questions..., David Hartley
    • Re: 2 algebra questions..., Gerry Myerson
      • Re: 2 algebra questions..., José Carlos Santos
      • Re: 2 algebra questions..., Gerry Myerson
      • Re: 2 algebra questions..., José Carlos Santos
• definite integral question, tamiry
  • Re: definite integral question, Igor Khavkine
• dumb stupid question (sorry), aendeuryu
  • Re: dumb stupid question (sorry), Randy Poe
    • Re: dumb stupid question (sorry), aendeuryu
• FLT - Level-1 case of the Serre conjecture - update, Narasimham G.L.
  • Re: FLT - Level-1 case of the Serre conjecture - update, Chip Eastham
    • Re: FLT - Level-1 case of the Serre conjecture - update, Chip Eastham
• A couple different definitions of infinity, Matt Gutting
  • Re: A couple different definitions of infinity, David Kastrup
    • Re: A couple different definitions of infinity, John H Palmieri
    • Re: A couple different definitions of infinity, Matt Gutting
  • Re: A couple different definitions of infinity, Stephen J. Herschkorn
    • Re: A couple different definitions of infinity, Matt Gutting
      • Re: A couple different definitions of infinity, Stephen J. Herschkorn
    • Re: A couple different definitions of infinity, Matt Gutting
  • Re: A couple different definitions of infinity - *CORRECTION*, Matt Gutting
    • Re: A couple different definitions of infinity - *CORRECTION*, W. Dale Hall
  • Re: A couple different definitions of infinity, Dave Seaman
  • Re: A couple different definitions of infinity, Virgil
    • Re: A couple different definitions of infinity, Hero
      • Re: A couple different definitions of infinity, Dave Seaman
      • Re: A couple different definitions of infinity, Hero
• Program to generate Pi, Fred
  • Re: Program to generate Pi, The Last Danish Pastry
    • Re: Program to generate Pi, Fred
      • Re: Program to generate Pi, DP
      • Re: Program to generate Pi, Fred
      • Re: Program to generate Pi, briggs
      • Re: Program to generate Pi, The Last Danish Pastry
      • Re: Program to generate Pi, Keith A. Lewis
      • Re: Program to generate Pi, Fred
      • Re: Program to generate Pi, The Last Danish Pastry
      • Re: Program to generate Pi, Fred
      • Re: Program to generate Pi, The Last Danish Pastry
      • Re: Program to generate Pi, Fred
      • Re: Program to generate Pi, The Last Danish Pastry
      • Re: Program to generate Pi, Dave Seaman
    • Re: Program to generate Pi,
      • Re: Program to generate Pi, briggs
  • Re: Program to generate Pi, C Rode
  • Re: Program to generate Pi, DP
• Crossword clue, The Last Danish Pastry
  • Re: Crossword clue, Bart Goddard
    • Re: Crossword clue, Rod
      • Re: Crossword clue, Bart Goddard
      • Re: Crossword clue, Russell
      • Re: Crossword clue, Bart Goddard
      • Re: Crossword clue, Russell
      • Re: Crossword clue, Matt Gutting
      • Re: Crossword clue, Proginoskes
      • Re: Crossword clue, Andy Spragg
      • Re: Crossword clue, Jim Spriggs
      • Re: Crossword clue, Bart Goddard
      • Re: Crossword clue, John Gabbriel
      • Re: Crossword clue, John Gabbriel
      • Re: Crossword clue, Bart Goddard
      • Re: Crossword clue, John Gabbriel
      • Re: Crossword clue, The Last Danish Pastry
      • Re: Crossword clue, Jeremy Boden
      • Re: Crossword clue, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Crossword clue, Proginoskes
      • Re: Crossword clue, Jeremy Boden
      • Re: Crossword clue, Proginoskes
      • Re: Crossword clue, Bart Goddard
      • Re: Crossword clue, Jeremy Boden
      • Re: Crossword clue, Gerry Myerson
      • Re: Crossword clue, Jeremy Boden
      • Re: Crossword clue, Proginoskes
      • Re: Crossword clue, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Crossword clue, Virgil
      • Re: Crossword clue, Bart Goddard
      • Re: Crossword clue, John Gabbriel
      • Re: Crossword clue, Richard Henry
      • Re: Crossword clue, Jim Spriggs
      • Re: Crossword clue, Bart Goddard
      • Re: Crossword clue, Proginoskes
      • Re: Crossword clue, Larry Lard
      • Re: Crossword clue, Jim Spriggs
      • Re: Crossword clue, Jeremy Boden
  • Re: Crossword clue, John Gabbriel
    • Re: Crossword clue, DP
  • Re: Crossword clue, G.E. Ivey
• d/dx this f please, Vec
  • Re: d/dx this f please, Peter L. Montgomery
  • Re: d/dx this f please, Arturo Magidin
  • Re: d/dx this f please, Ari
  • Re: d/dx this f please, William Elliot
  • Re: d/dx this f please, Heikki Kaskelma
    • Re: d/dx this f please, Matt Gutting
      • Re: d/dx this f please, Heikki Kaskelma
      • Re: d/dx this f please, Matt Gutting
  • Re: d/dx this f please, DP
• About the group of Mobius Transformations, dalthman
  • Re: About the group of Mobius Transformations, José Carlos Santos
    • Re: About the group of Mobius Transformations, Alain Verghote
• Short analysis questions, We Pretty
  • Re: Short analysis questions, The World Wide Wade
  • Re: Short analysis questions, The World Wide Wade
    • Re: Short analysis questions, The World Wide Wade
• Probabilities question, michael
  • Re: Probabilities question, michael
    • Re: Probabilities question, Proginoskes
      • Re: Probabilities question, michael
  • Re: Probabilities question, Gerry Myerson
    • Re: Probabilities question, Rob Pratt
• One-point compactification of Q, William Elliot
  • Re: One-point compactification of Q, José Carlos Santos
    • Re: One-point compactification of Q, Zundark
      • Re: One-point compactification of Q, José Carlos Santos
      • Re: One-point compactification of Q, William Elliot
  • Re: One-point compactification of Q, Zundark
    • One-point compactification of Q, William Elliot
      • Re: One-point compactification of Q, Zundark
      • Re: One-point compactification of Q, William Elliot
• New mathematics/physical sciences positions at http://jobs.phds.org, April 25, 2005, PhDs . org Webmaster
• 7.2569463050..., mindpixel
  • Re: 7.2569463050..., Proginoskes
  • Re: 7.2569463050..., Brian Webb
    • Re: 7.2569463050..., Alan
  • Re: 7.2569463050..., Mrs Unreliable
• Re: Integer solution to Pythagorean equation x^2 + y^2 = z^2, Randall
  • Re: Integer solution to Pythagorean equation x^2 + y^2 = z^2, Lawrence House
    • Re: Integer solution to Pythagorean equation x^2 + y^2 = z^2, Randall
      • Re: Integer solution to Pythagorean equation x^2 + y^2 = z^2, Roman B. Binder
• Re: Two Az's, Tim Peters
• Even numbers: the sum of two multiples of exponents of two, Michelle Fry
  • Re: Even numbers: the sum of two multiples of exponents of two, Arturo Magidin
• Re: JSH: Why would mathematicians lie?, mhochster
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: JSH: Why would mathematicians lie?, David Rosoff
    • Re: JSH: Why would mathematicians lie?, Dr Tomato
• Re: Why would mathematicians lie?, vsgdp
• linear algebra and DE, vsgdp
  • Re: linear algebra and DE, Ulysse Keller
• derivative, vsgdp
  • Re: derivative, Virgil
    • Re: derivative, Lynn Kurtz
• Algebra Help, Chris W
  • Re: Algebra Help, Heikki Kaskelma
• Help with a differential equation, freelancerprogrammer
  • Re: Help with a differential equation, A N Niel
    • Re: Help with a differential equation, Ron Sperber
      • Re: Help with a differential equation, A N Niel
      • Re: Help with a differential equation, Ron Sperber
      • Re: Help with a differential equation, Gerry Myerson
• READING ITERATION NOTATION QUESTION, raydpratt
• Re: SF: Generalized SFT's, Tim Peters
  • Re: SF: Generalized SFT's, Mark Atherton
    • Re: SF: Generalized SFT's, Tim Peters
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: SF: Generalized SFT's, Tim Peters
  • Re: SF: Generalized SFT's, Jesse F. Hughes
• fractal dimension, Jos? Mar?a C.G.
  • Re: fractal dimension, G. A. Edgar
    • Re: fractal dimension, Jos? Mar?a C.G.
      • Re: fractal dimension, G. A. Edgar
• Prove that a set is a monoid, but not a ring, grimster
  • Re: Prove that a set is a monoid, but not a ring, grimster
    • Re: Prove that a set is a monoid, but not a ring, grimster
      • Re: Prove that a set is a monoid, but not a ring, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: Prove that a set is a monoid, but not a ring, grimster
      • Re: Prove that a set is a monoid, but not a ring, Arturo Magidin
• A simple (?) probability problem, Kenny McCormack
  • Re: A simple (?) probability problem, Stephen J. Herschkorn
    • Re: A simple (?) probability problem, David Hartley
      • Re: A simple (?) probability problem, Stephen J. Herschkorn
      • Re: A simple (?) probability problem, Kenny McCormack
      • Re: A simple (?) probability problem, David Hartley
• Re: differntial calculus problem #i, The Qurqirish Dragon
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: differntial calculus problem #i, puppetz
• Re: Finding the largest rectangle which fit inside a circle., Arthur B.
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Finding the largest rectangle which fit inside a circle., Keith A. Lewis
    • Re: Finding the largest rectangle which fit inside a circle., Amadeus Train-Owwell Zirconium
      • Re: Finding the largest rectangle which fit inside a circle., Alex Hunsley
      • Re: Finding the largest rectangle which fit inside a circle., Amadeus Train-Owwell Zirconium
      • Re: Finding the largest rectangle which fit inside a circle., Amadeus Train-Owwell Zirconium
• Transfer function using z transform, Thuan Seah,Tan
• Dont miss out on low rates, "Marcelino Stacy"
• second order ODE (numerical), vsgdp
  • Re: second order ODE (numerical), William Elliot
    • Re: second order ODE (numerical), vsgdp
• Looking for a paper, Arthur B.
  • Re: Looking for a paper, John Bailey
• Laplace transform of [f(x)]^2, Roman Groger
  • Re: Laplace transform of [f(x)]^2, A N Niel
    • Re: Laplace transform of [f(x)]^2, Alain Verghote
    • Re: Laplace transform of [f(x)]^2, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Laplace transform of [f(x)]^2, Roman Groger
      • Re: Laplace transform of [f(x)]^2, Alain Verghote
      • Re: Laplace transform of [f(x)]^2, Roman Groger
      • Re: Laplace transform of [f(x)]^2, Robert Israel
      • Re: Laplace transform of [f(x)]^2, David C . Ullrich
• Relation between left ideals and idempotents?, Kitty
  • Re: Relation between left ideals and idempotents?, Marc Olschok
    • Re: Relation between left ideals and idempotents?, Kitty
      • Re: Relation between left ideals and idempotents?, Kitty
• Re: wailing lightly on Halmos's Naive Set Theory, xmp
  • Re: wailing lightly on Halmos's Naive Set Theory, Timothy Murphy
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: wailing lightly on Halmos's Naive Set Theory, Stuart M Newberger
• dihedral group, Li Yi
  • Re: dihedral group, Timothy Murphy
• best Inroduction to Riemannian Geometry ?, Courtney Thomas
  • Re: best Inroduction to Riemannian Geometry ?, Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: TUTTE'S fragment. An adventure in graph theory., Matthew Cook
  • Re: TUTTE'S fragment. An adventure in graph theory., David Eppstein
• mathematics, jjegicano
  • Re: mathematics, Dirk Van de moortel
  • Re: mathematics, Tonico
  • Re: mathematics, Stuart M Newberger
  • Re: mathematics, A N Niel
    • Re: mathematics, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: mathematics, G.E. Ivey
      • Re: mathematics, Matt Gutting
  • Re: mathematics, Robert Kolker
  • Re: mathematics, G.E. Ivey
    • Re: mathematics, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: mathematics, rich burge
      • Re: mathematics, Proginoskes
      • Re: mathematics, rich burge
      • Re: mathematics, Virgil
      • Re: mathematics, rich burge
      • Re: mathematics, Matt Gutting
      • Re: mathematics, rich burge
      • Re: mathematics, Virgil
      • Re: mathematics, Robert Kolker
      • Re: mathematics, Virgil
      • Re: mathematics, Keith Ramsay
      • Re: mathematics, cbrown
      • Re: mathematics, rich burge
      • Re: mathematics, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
      • Re: mathematics, Robert Kolker
      • Re: mathematics, xmp
      • Re: mathematics, Robert Kolker
      • Re: mathematics, Herman Rubin
      • Re: mathematics, Robert Israel
      • Re: mathematics, Jim Spriggs
      • Re: mathematics, Robert Kolker
    • Re: mathematics, Stuart M Newberger
  • Re: mathematics, Lawrence House
    • Re: mathematics, Robert Kolker
      • Re: mathematics, Virgil
  • Re: mathematics, Jim Spriggs
    • Re: mathematics, Robert Kolker
• math and technology, deann
  • Re: math and technology, Dirk Van de moortel
  • Re: math and technology, Stuart M Newberger
  • Re: math and technology, Robert Kolker
  • Re: math and technology, Will Twentyman
    • Re: math and technology, Robert Kolker
• What is time?, arnelpelonia
  • Re: What is time?, Proginoskes
  • Re: What is time?, Dirk Van de moortel
    • Re: What is time?, Stuart M Newberger
      • Re: What is time?, Dirk Van de moortel
  • Re: What is time?, Jim Burns
    • Re: What is time?, Dirk Van de moortel
  • Re: What is time?, Lawrence House
• pythegorean triples., arnelpelonia
  • Re: pythegorean triples., Virgil
    • Re: pythegorean triples., Proginoskes
    • Re: pythegorean triples., Oscar Lanzi III
    • Re: pythegorean triples., Keith A. Lewis
  • Re: pythegorean triples., Randall
  • Re: pythegorean triples., Zdislav V. Kovarik
  • Re: pythegorean triples., b92057
    • Re: pythegorean triples., b92057
      • Re: pythegorean triples., b92057
  • Message not available
    • Re: pythegorean triples., Gottfried Helms
• Simple questions about topology, Barnaby Finch
  • Re: Simple questions about topology, The World Wide Wade
  • Re: Simple questions about topology, A N Niel
    • Re: Simple questions about topology, michael lawton
      • Re: Simple questions about topology, The World Wide Wade
      • Re: Simple questions about topology, Herman Rubin
  • Re: Simple questions about topology, Dave L. Renfro
• Annihilator question, George
  • Re: Annihilator question, Stephen J. Herschkorn
• Re: Triangulation of position, Keith A. Lewis
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Triangulation of position, Stan Liou
• knapsack related question, JoJo
  • Re: knapsack related question, Proginoskes
  • Re: knapsack related question, John Bailey
  • Re: knapsack related question, rich burge
• Differential equation, Sailesh Kumar
  • Re: Differential equation, Pubkeybreaker
• integrate 1/x prove, Vec
  • Re: integrate 1/x prove, Arturo Magidin
    • Re: integrate 1/x prove, Vec
      • Re: integrate 1/x prove, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: integrate 1/x prove, Justin Young
      • Re: integrate 1/x prove, Vec
      • Re: integrate 1/x prove, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: integrate 1/x prove, Proginoskes
      • Re: integrate 1/x prove, Zdislav V. Kovarik
  • Re: integrate 1/x prove, Mike Kent
  • Re: integrate 1/x prove, Keith A. Lewis
  • Re: integrate 1/x prove, Nathan
    • Re: integrate 1/x prove - Vredenduin's proof - 3rd reply attempt, JEMebius
  • Re: integrate 1/x prove, alain verghote
• straight line formula, John Doe III
  • Re: straight line formula, Richard Tobin
    • Re: straight line formula, John Doe III
      • Re: straight line formula, Dan Piponi
      • Re: straight line formula, N. Silver
  • Re: straight line formula, Virgil
  • Re: straight line formula, Dave Rusin
  • Re: straight line formula, Dinesh Karia
  • Re: straight line formula, Ken Pledger
• Groups of order 36, Van
  • Re: Groups of order 36, Jim Heckman
    • Re: Groups of order 36, Van
      • Re: Groups of order 36, Van
      • Re: Groups of order 36, Jim Heckman
      • Re: Groups of order 36, Van
      • Re: Groups of order 36, Jim Heckman
• this is probably an easy question but..., chuckfuller
  • Re: this is probably an easy question but..., Larry Lard
  • Re: this is probably an easy question but..., Lynn Kurtz
    • Re: this is probably an easy question but..., Russell
      • Re: this is probably an easy question but..., Russell
    • Re: this is probably an easy question but..., Wim Benthem
• Question about defn of "Derivative of a Distribution", Brenneman
  • Re: Question about defn of "Derivative of a Distribution", G.E. Ivey
• prove surjection, tom
  • Re: prove surjection, Ulysse Keller
    • Re: prove surjection, tom
      • Re: prove surjection, Ulysse Keller
      • Re: prove surjection, grimster
      • Re: prove surjection, Ulysse Keller
      • Re: prove surjection, grimster
      • Re: prove surjection, Ulysse Keller
• Generating a PDF for data set using IQR, mean and median, Jake Mulch
  • Re: Generating a PDF for data set using IQR, mean and median, Keith A. Lewis
  • Re: Generating a PDF for data set using IQR, mean and median, Herman Rubin
  • Re: Generating a PDF for data set using IQR, mean and median, Robert B. Israel
• Chi-square test of digits in Pick4 game, Stig Holmquist
• basic math challenge - how to find x and y if only one equation is provided ?, archilleswaterland
  • Re: basic math challenge - how to find x and y if only one equation is provided ?, Larry Lard
  • Re: basic math challenge - how to find x and y if only one equation is provided ?, Randy Poe
  • Re: basic math challenge - how to find x and y if only one equation is provided ?, stush
  • Re: basic math challenge - how to find x and y if only one equation is provided ?, Philippe 92
  • Re: basic math challenge - how to find x and y if only one equation is provided ?, M.J.T. Guy
    • Re: basic math challenge - how to find x and y if only one equation is provided ?, archilleswaterland@xxxxxxxxxxx
• How to get any answers, Joe
  • Re: How to get any answers, Angus Rodgers
• more examples of odd and even functions, jiggerface
  • Re: more examples of odd and even functions, Robin Chapman
    • Re: more examples of odd and even functions,
      • Re: more examples of odd and even functions, José Carlos Santos
    • Re: more examples of odd and even functions, Peter L. Montgomery
      • Re: more examples of odd and even functions, Alain Verghote
      • Re: more examples of odd and even functions, Narasimham G.L.
• " solving h( 3*x^ 2 + 2*x + 1) = { h(x)} ^ 2 + k ; h and k unknown ", alain verghote
  • Re: " solving h( 3*x^ 2 + 2*x + 1) = { h(x)} ^ 2 + k ; h and k unknown ", G. A. Edgar
  • Re: " solving h( 3*x^ 2 + 2*x + 1) = { h(x)} ^ 2 + k ; h and k unknown ", alain verghote
    • Re: " solving h( 3*x^ 2 + 2*x + 1) = { h(x)} ^ 2 + k ; h and k unknown ", G. A. Edgar
  • Re: " solving h( 3*x^ 2 + 2*x + 1) = { h(x)} ^ 2 + k ; h and k unknown ", M.J.T. Guy
• sets with n pairs of braces, David Bernier
  • Re: sets with n pairs of braces, Robin Chapman
  • Re: sets with n pairs of braces, David Bernier
• Cretinism was Re: Courage?, Robin Chapman
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Cretinism was Re: Courage?, Robin Chapman
    • Re: Cretinism was Re: Courage?, Dik T. Winter
  • Cretinism was Re: Courage?, Robin Chapman
  • Cretinism was Re: Courage?, Robin Chapman
  • Cretinism was Re: Courage?, Robin Chapman
• What does it means for an arc to be "squarable", analysisman
  • Re: What does it means for an arc to be "squarable", Robert Israel
• Can there be a continuous 1-1 curve from [0,1] to R^2 that is infinite?, analysisman
  • Re: Can there be a continuous 1-1 curve from [0,1] to R^2 that is infinite?, Keith Ramsay
    • Re: Can there be a continuous 1-1 curve from [0,1] to R^2 that is infinite?, analysisman
      • Re: Can there be a continuous 1-1 curve from [0,1] to R^2 that is infinite?, Robert Israel
      • Re: Can there be a continuous 1-1 curve from [0,1] to R^2 that is infinite?, Keith Ramsay
  • Re: Can there be a continuous 1-1 curve from [0,1] to R^2 that is infinite?, Stephen J. Herschkorn
    • Re: Can there be a continuous 1-1 curve from [0,1] to R^2 that is infinite?, Proginoskes
    • Re: Can there be a continuous 1-1 curve from [0,1] to R^2 that is, analysisman
  • Re: Can there be a continuous 1-1 curve from [0,1] to R^2 that is infinite?, Willem H. de Boer
    • Re: Can there be a continuous 1-1 curve from [0,1] to R^2 that is infinite?, Willem H. de Boer
  • Re: Can there be a continuous 1-1 curve from [0,1] to R^2 that is infinite?, Tony
• Curves Homeomorphic to the real line., analysisman
  • Re: Curves Homeomorphic to the real line., analysisman
  • Re: Curves Homeomorphic to the real line., Virgil
    • Re: Curves Homeomorphic to the real line., The World Wide Wade
  • Re: Curves Homeomorphic to the real line., Robin Chapman
  • Re: Curves Homeomorphic to the real line., The World Wide Wade
    • Re: Curves Homeomorphic to the real line., Robin Chapman
      • Re: Curves Homeomorphic to the real line., Stuart M Newberger
      • Re: Curves Homeomorphic to the real line., The World Wide Wade
• (in-)homogeneous boundary conditions?, onehappymadman
  • Re: (in-)homogeneous boundary conditions?, Igor Khavkine
    • Re: (in-)homogeneous boundary conditions?, onehappymadman
      • Re: (in-)homogeneous boundary conditions?, Igor Khavkine
    • Re: (in-)homogeneous boundary conditions?, onehappymadman
      • Re: (in-)homogeneous boundary conditions?, Igor Khavkine
• Counterexample in algebra: maximal ideal contraction, daniel . wolff
  • Re: Counterexample in algebra: maximal ideal contraction, Hagen
• Lowest rate approval, "Roy Hawkins"
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Lowest rate approval, "Dwayne Acevedo"
• Re: Cardinality, Computability, and Craziness, HERC777
  • Re: Cardinality, Computability, and Craziness, The Ghost In The Machine
    • Re: Cardinality, Computability, and Craziness, HERC777
      • Re: Cardinality, Computability, and Craziness, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: Cardinality, Computability, and Craziness, HERC777
      • Re: Cardinality, Computability, and Craziness, The Ghost In The Machine
      • Re: Cardinality, Computability, and Craziness, HERC777
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Cardinality, Computability, and Craziness, FunnyGuy
• analysis question, Pouya D. Tafti
  • Re: analysis question, Robert Israel
    • Re: analysis question, Pouya D. Tafti
• graph question - need some help..., kiwi
• can anybody show me the math why differential entropy of a mixed-type distribution is -infinity?, lucy
• Split or Irreducible, jamesdickerson00
  • Re: Split or Irreducible, Arturo Magidin
    • Re: Split or Irreducible, jamesdickerson00
      • Re: Split or Irreducible, Arturo Magidin
• remote sensing of colors, michel
  • Re: remote sensing of colors, Larry Hammick
• determinant optimization problem (is permutation the best?), tlet
  • Re: determinant optimization problem (is permutation the best?), Robert Israel
    • Re: determinant optimization problem (is permutation the best?), tlet
• Question: Choleski decomposition where Lii = 0, J. Mitchell
• Points on a line and in a bounded area, Peteris Krumins
  • Re: Points on a line and in a bounded area, Pubkeybreaker
    • Re: Points on a line and in a bounded area, none
    • Re: Points on a line and in a bounded area, W. Dale Hall
  • Re: Points on a line and in a bounded area, Rick Decker
  • Re: Points on a line and in a bounded area, William Elliot
    • Re: Points on a line and in a bounded area, Herman Rubin
  • Re: Points on a line and in a bounded area, Lynn Kurtz
• order on sets with large cardinality, none
  • Re: order on sets with large cardinality, Arturo Magidin
    • Re: order on sets with large cardinality, none
      • Re: order on sets with large cardinality, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: order on sets with large cardinality, Dave Seaman
  • Re: order on sets with large cardinality, William Elliot
• Questions concerning axiom of choice, Doug B
  • Re: Questions concerning axiom of choice, Arturo Magidin
    • Re: Questions concerning axiom of choice, Jim Spriggs
      • Re: Questions concerning axiom of choice, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: Questions concerning axiom of choice, Doug B
      • Re: Questions concerning axiom of choice, Dave Seaman
      • Re: Questions concerning axiom of choice, Stephen J. Herschkorn
      • Re: Questions concerning axiom of choice, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: Questions concerning axiom of choice, Jim Spriggs
• Dimensions, Peteris Krumins
  • Re: Dimensions, none
    • Re: Dimensions, Michael Orion
      • Re: Dimensions, Dave Rusin
      • Re: Dimensions, Michael Orion
    • Re: Dimensions, Zdislav V. Kovarik
  • Re: Dimensions, Willem H. de Boer
• Aleph-7 (?), JH
  • Re: Aleph-7 (?), Arturo Magidin
    • Re: Aleph-7 (?), Oscar Lanzi III
  • Re: Aleph-7 (?), Dave Seaman
  • Re: Aleph-7 (?), Keith Ramsay
    • Re: Aleph-7 (?), Helmut Richter
    • Re: Aleph-7 (?), Arturo Magidin
      • Re: Aleph-7 (?), Keith Ramsay
      • Re: Aleph-7 (?), Hero
      • Re: Aleph-7 (?), The Qurqirish Dragon
      • Re: Aleph-7 (?), Dave Seaman
      • Re: Aleph-7 (?), Hero
      • Message not available
      • Re: Aleph-7 (?), Hero
      • Message not available
      • Re: Aleph-7 (?), Richard Tobin
      • Re: Aleph-7 (?), Peter Webb
      • Re: Aleph-7 (?), Hero
      • Re: Aleph-7 (?), Richard Tobin
      • Re: Aleph-7 (?), Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Aleph-7 (?), Stephen J. Herschkorn
      • Re: Aleph-7 (?), Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Aleph-7 (?), Dave Seaman
      • Re: Aleph-7 (?), Dave Seaman
      • Re: Aleph-7 (?), Richard Tobin
      • Re: Aleph-7 (?), Keith Ramsay
      • Re: Aleph-7 (?), Hero
      • Re: Aleph-7 (?), Keith Ramsay
      • Re: Aleph-7 (?), Arturo Magidin
      • Re: Aleph-7 (?), Keith Ramsay
      • Re: Aleph-7 (?), Arturo Magidin
      • Re: Aleph-7 (?), Keith Ramsay
      • Re: Aleph-7 (?), Mitch Harris
    • Re: Aleph-7 (?), Eckard Blumschein
• Matrix equation, Chris Rodgers
  • Re: Matrix equation, Randy Poe
• Re: Is this impossible?, toblerone845
• Choleski decomposition where Lii = 0, J. Mitchell
• SineIntegral inequality, Grigorios Kostakos
  • Re: SineIntegral inequality, alexandru . lupas
  • Re: SineIntegral inequality, A N Niel
    • Re: SineIntegral inequality, Grigorios Kostakos
• minimisation of a function, allan
  • Re: minimisation of a function, Keith A. Lewis
  • Re: minimisation of a function, Narasimham G.L.
• L^1 convergence question again..., Tony
  • Re: L^1 convergence question again..., A N Niel
  • Re: L^1 convergence question again..., David C . Ullrich
• Simple, vanwamelen
  • Re: Simple, Willy Butz
    • Re: Simple, Bart Goddard
      • Re: Simple, Michael Orion
      • Re: Simple, Bart Goddard
      • Re: Simple, Michael Orion
    • Re: Simple, Michael Orion
      • Re: Simple, vanwamelen
  • Re: Simple, Randy Poe
    • Re: Simple, vanwamelen
  • Re: Simple, Jim Spriggs
• JSH: Interesting behavior, jstevh
  • Re: JSH: Interesting behavior, David Kastrup
    • Re: JSH: Interesting behavior, Rick Decker
      • Re: JSH: Interesting behavior, David Kastrup
      • Re: JSH: Interesting behavior, Proginoskes
      • Re: JSH: Interesting behavior, Proginoskes
      • Re: JSH: Interesting behavior, Proginoskes
      • Re: JSH: Interesting behavior, Proginoskes
      • Re: JSH: Interesting behavior, Proginoskes
      • Re: JSH: Interesting behavior, Proginoskes
  • Re: JSH: Interesting behavior, C. Bond
  • Message not available
    • Re: JSH: Interesting behavior, Russell
      • Re: JSH: Interesting behavior, Jim Spriggs
      • Re: JSH: Interesting behavior, Gib Bogle
      • Re: JSH: Interesting behavior, Proginoskes
      • Re: JSH: Interesting behavior, Gib Bogle
      • Re: JSH: Interesting behavior, Jim Spriggs
      • Re: JSH: Interesting behavior, David Kastrup
      • Re: JSH: Interesting behavior, Amadeus Train-Owwell Zirconium
• Searching a linked list?, JS
  • Re: Searching a linked list?, Randy Poe
    • Re: Searching a linked list?, JS
      • Re: Searching a linked list?, Randy Poe
  • Re: Searching a linked list?, stush
• Re: JSH: Surrogate Factoring Fails Completely, What Next?, Jesse F. Hughes
• sum formulas fo trigs, Vec
  • Re: sum formulas fo trigs, denis feldmann
  • Re: sum formulas fo trigs, Phil Freedenberg
  • Re: sum formulas fo trigs, mathedman
    • Re: sum formulas fo trigs, Boi
    • Re: sum formulas fo trigs, Vec
• normal subgroup and cosets, Liyi
  • Re: normal subgroup and cosets, Daniel W. Johnson
  • Re: normal subgroup and cosets, William Elliot
    • Re: normal subgroup and cosets, Daniel W. Johnson
      • Re: normal subgroup and cosets, William Elliot
      • Re: normal subgroup and cosets, Li Yi
    • Re: normal subgroup and cosets, Daniel W. Johnson
      • Re: normal subgroup and cosets, William Elliot
    • Re: normal subgroup and cosets, William Elliot
      • Re: normal subgroup and cosets, William Elliot
  • Re: normal subgroup and cosets, Arturo Magidin
• normal subgroups and cosets, Li Yi
  • Re: normal subgroups and cosets, Sagar Kolte
• Irrationality of e^k, Hans Engler
  • Re: Irrationality of e^k, Robert Israel
  • Re: Irrationality of e^k, rich burge
• What is the answer to this coutric fancapsized curivullar calculus problem?, DenisKupchyk
  • Re: What is the answer to this coutric fancapsized curivullar calculus problem?, bernard massé
  • Re: What is the answer to this coutric fancapsized curivullar calculus problem?, Pubkeybreaker
    • Re: What is the answer to this coutric fancapsized curivullar calculus problem?, Larry Hammick
• JSH: What will you do?, jstevh
  • Re: JSH: What will you do?, jshsucks
  • Re: What will you do?, Tim Peters
    • Re: What will you do?, William Hughes
      • Re: What will you do?, Tim Peters
      • Re: What will you do?, David C . Ullrich
  • Re: What will you do?, flip
  • Re: JSH: What will you do?, W. Dale Hall
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: JSH: What will you do?, C. Bond
      • Re: JSH: What will you do?, Tim Peters
      • Re: JSH: What will you do?, Matt Gutting
      • Re: JSH: What will you do?, Tim Peters
      • Re: JSH: What will you do?, Proginoskes
      • Re: JSH: What will you do?, Amadeus Train-Owwell Zirconium
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: JSH: What will you do?, Tim Peters
      • Re: JSH: What will you do?, Rick Decker
  • Re: JSH: What will you do?, bryant_j_j
    • Re: JSH: What will you do?, Rick Decker
• JSH: Objectivity, linking hyperbolas, jstevh
  • Re: JSH: Objectivity, linking hyperbolas, David Kastrup
  • Re: JSH: Objectivity, linking hyperbolas, Proginoskes
  • Re: JSH: Objectivity, linking hyperbolas, DenisKupchyk
    • Re: JSH: Objectivity, linking hyperbolas, Lash Rambo
  • Re: JSH: Objectivity, linking hyperbolas, fishfry
  • Re: JSH: Objectivity, linking hyperbolas, Gib Bogle
• Simple (probability?) question., vanwamelen
  • Re: Simple (probability?) question., Bill97
    • Re: Simple (probability?) question., vanwamelen
• Changing boundary conditions from Dirichlet to Robin for steady state solution of diffusion equation with decay (modified Helmholtz) on semi infinite domain with point source, Megan Pedoe
• Metric for space of lines, none
• Family of Curves in Cesaro's Form (Natural Equations), Joe
• Tapping, k
• a square between twin primes ..., gerard46
  • Re: a square between twin primes ..., A N Niel
  • Re: a square between twin primes ..., Pubkeybreaker
  • Re: a square between twin primes ..., Arturo Magidin
  • Re: a square between twin primes ..., Christian Bau
• Re: Usenet, unfortunately, James Dolan
  • Re: Usenet, unfortunately, Angus Rodgers
    • Re: Usenet, unfortunately, James Dolan
      • Re: Usenet, unfortunately, Angus Rodgers
• JSH: Surrogate Factoring, William Hughes
  • Re: JSH: Surrogate Factoring, C. Bond
  • Re: JSH: Surrogate Factoring, Rick Decker
  • Re: JSH: Surrogate Factoring, Matt Gutting
  • Re: JSH: Surrogate Factoring, James Burns
  • Re: JSH: Surrogate Factoring, David C . Ullrich
• Derivatives, Vec
  • Re: Derivatives, tamiry
  • Re: Derivatives, Jard
    • Re: Derivatives, Jard
      • Re: Derivatives, David C . Ullrich
    • Re: Derivatives, Boi
      • Re: Derivatives, Jard
      • Re: Derivatives, Boi
      • Re: Derivatives, Jard
  • Re: Derivatives, JEMebius
• Math essay, dimovich
  • Re: Math essay, Phil Freedenberg
    • Re: Math essay, dimovich
  • Re: Math essay, A N Niel
  • Re: Math essay, alessandra_cabrini
  • Re: Math essay, Justin Young
  • Re: Math essay, Stephen J. Herschkorn
    • Re: Math essay, Robert Vienneau
• An Integral to look over!, djgk53
  • Re: An Integral to look over!, Robin Chapman
  • Re: An Integral to look over!, Alois Steindl
    • Re: An Integral to look over!, bernard massé
  • Re: An Integral to look over!, Stephen J. Herschkorn
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: An Integral to look over!, SU(2)
• Square roots of N * i (for all i from 1 to N), Sandra
  • Re: Square roots of N * i (for all i from 1 to N), itatuzov
  • Re: Square roots of N * i (for all i from 1 to N), Wim Benthem
  • Re: Square roots of N * i (for all i from 1 to N), Keith A. Lewis
  • Re: Square roots of N * i (for all i from 1 to N), alessandra_cabrini
    • Re: Square roots of N * i (for all i from 1 to N), Helmut Richter
      • Re: Square roots of N * i (for all i from 1 to N), alessandra_cabrini
  • Re: Square roots of N * i (for all i from 1 to N), M.J.T. Guy
    • Re: Square roots of N * i (for all i from 1 to N), alessandra_cabrini
• JSH: Easy one way, hard the other, jstevh
  • Re: JSH: Easy one way, hard the other, Larry Lard
  • Re: JSH: Easy one way, hard the other, David Kastrup
  • Re: JSH: Easy one way, hard the other, David C . Ullrich
    • Re: JSH: Easy one way, hard the other, litsohate
      • Re: JSH: Easy one way, hard the other, Rick Decker
      • Re: JSH: Easy one way, hard the other, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: JSH: Easy one way, hard the other, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: JSH: Easy one way, hard the other, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: JSH: Easy one way, hard the other, C. Bond
    • Re: JSH: Easy one way, hard the other, Proginoskes
  • Re: JSH: Easy one way, hard the other, José Carlos Santos
  • Re: JSH: Easy one way, hard the other, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: JSH: Easy one way, hard the other, Matt Gutting
      • Re: JSH: Easy one way, hard the other, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
• factoring question, Jeroen Boschma
  • Re: factoring question, Pubkeybreaker
    • Re: factoring question, Jeroen Boschma
• Challenging ODE, john_ramsden
  • Re: Challenging ODE, Robert Israel
• integral of ultimately monotone functions, Ailton
  • Re: integral of ultimately monotone functions, David C . Ullrich
  • Message not available
    • Re: integral of ultimately monotone functions, The World Wide Wade
      • Re: integral of ultimately monotone functions, Bill97
  • Re: integral of ultimately monotone functions, Robert Israel
• Free physics event Boston Wednesday April 20, 2005 - Guth /Wolfram /Kirshner, reva
  • Re: Free physics event Boston Wednesday April 20, 2005 - Guth /Wolfram /Kirshner, Amadeus Train-Owwell Zirconium
• Delta Functions, Kevin
  • Re: Delta Functions, Ulysse Keller
  • Re: Delta Functions, W. Dale Hall
    • Re: Delta Functions, Kevin
      • Re: Delta Functions, W. Dale Hall
• FERMAT'S LAST THEOREM, SASWATA SHANNIGRAHI
  • Re: FERMAT'S LAST THEOREM, Gerry Myerson
  • Re: FERMAT'S LAST THEOREM, Daniel W. Johnson
  • Re: FERMAT'S LAST THEOREM, denis feldmann
  • Re: FERMAT'S LAST THEOREM, Gib Bogle
  • Re: FERMAT'S LAST THEOREM, Michael Orion
    • Re: FERMAT'S LAST THEOREM, Andy Watkins
  • Re: FERMAT'S LAST THEOREM, Andy Watkins
    • Re: FERMAT'S LAST THEOREM, Dik T. Winter
      • Re: FERMAT'S LAST THEOREM, Andy Watkins
      • Re: FERMAT'S LAST THEOREM, Dave Rusin
      • Re: FERMAT'S LAST THEOREM, Andy Watkins
• JSH: Stupid lies, hyperbolas and SFT, jstevh
  • Re: JSH: Stupid lies, hyperbolas and SFT, jshsucks
  • Re: JSH: Stupid lies, hyperbolas and SFT, Rick Decker
    • Re: JSH: Stupid lies, hyperbolas and SFT, jstevh
      • Re: JSH: Stupid lies, hyperbolas and SFT, Jesse F. Hughes
  • Re: Stupid lies, hyperbolas and SFT, Tim Peters
  • Re: JSH: Stupid lies, hyperbolas and SFT, Proginoskes
  • Re: JSH: Stupid lies, hyperbolas and SFT, C. Bond
• probability of points on the unit circle to hit each other, crtn
  • Re: probability of points on the unit circle to hit each other, Robert Israel
    • Re: probability of points on the unit circle to hit each other, Herman Rubin
• Convergence of random variables, quantalfred
  • Re: Convergence of random variables, Stephen J. Herschkorn
    • Re: Convergence of random variables, quantalfred
      • Re: Convergence of random variables, Stephen J. Herschkorn
      • Re: Convergence of random variables, quantalfred
  • Re: Convergence of random variables, ArtflDodgr
    • Re: Convergence of random variables, quantalfred
  • Re: Convergence of random variables, Herman Rubin
• Proof of bijection, agapito6314
  • Re: Proof of bijection, Arturo Magidin
  • Re: Proof of bijection, stush
    • Re: Proof of bijection, stush
  • Re: Proof of bijection, Bill Dubuque
    • Re: Proof of bijection, agapito6314
• Introduce VxBuilder, A free visualized computing/aglorithm analysis and TDR\CASE tool, Smarter Case
• Computing the dual of a code, jeffconner50
  • Re: Computing the dual of a code, Robin Chapman
    • Re: Computing the dual of a code, jeffconner50
      • Re: Computing the dual of a code, Robin Chapman
      • Re: Computing the dual of a code, warren065
      • Re: Computing the dual of a code, Robin Chapman
• polynomial algebra question, John H Palmieri
  • Re: polynomial algebra question, Chip Eastham
    • Re: polynomial algebra question, John H Palmieri
      • Re: polynomial algebra question, Chip Eastham
    • Re: polynomial algebra question, Hagen
      • Re: polynomial algebra question, John H Palmieri
  • Re: polynomial algebra question, Dave Rusin
    • Re: polynomial algebra question, Dave Rusin
• Integral of implicit function?, Giuseppe Bilotta
• Sum of factors, Néstor
  • Re: Sum of factors, Willem H. de Boer
    • Re: Sum of factors, Néstor
      • Re: Sum of factors, Willem H. de Boer
      • Re: Sum of factors, Willem H. de Boer
      • Re: Sum of factors, Christian Bau
  • Re: Sum of factors, Dave Rusin
  • Re: Sum of factors, M.J.T. Guy
  • Re: Sum of factors, stush
    • Re: Sum of factors, Néstor
      • Re: Sum of factors, Christian Bau
    • Re: Sum of factors, Néstor
      • Read Carefully, Dror Speiser
      • Re: Sum of factors, Christian Bau
      • Re: Sum of factors, Néstor
      • Re: Sum of factors, Dik T. Winter
      • Re: Sum of factors, Néstor
      • Re: Sum of factors, Dik T. Winter
  • Re: Sum of factors, Christian Bau
  • Re: Sum of factors, Dror Speiser
  • Re: Sum of factors, Willem H. de Boer
    • Re: Sum of factors, Néstor
      • Re: Sum of factors, Néstor
      • Re: Sum of factors, Willem H. de Boer
    • Re: Sum of factors, Willem H. de Boer
    • Re: Sum of factors, Willem H. de Boer
  • Re: Sum of factors, Tony
    • Re: Sum of factors, Herman Rubin
• ordering for an uncomplete tournament, Boris
  • Re: ordering for an uncomplete tournament, Dave Seaman
• Family of Curves in Cesaro's Form: f(s)=p*(1-cos(s)), Joe_Ercolino
  • Re: Family of Curves in Cesaro's Form: f(s)=p*(1-cos(s)), Alain Verghote
    • Re: Family of Curves in Cesaro's Form: f(s)=p*(1-cos(s)), Joe
      • Re: Family of Curves in Cesaro's Form: f(s)=p*(1-cos(s)), Joe
• Spread the word and save the world, Anonymous via the Cypherpunks Tonga Remailer
• Group GL(2,3), Van
  • Re: Group GL(2,3),
    • Re: Group GL(2,3), Van
    • Re: Group GL(2,3), Jim Heckman
      • Re: Group GL(2,3),
      • Re: Group GL(2,3), Jim Heckman
      • Re: Group GL(2,3),
      • Re: Group GL(2,3), Jim Heckman
• Counting segments, Néstor
  • Re: Counting segments, Erland Gadde
    • Re: Counting segments, Néstor
  • Re: Counting segments, Keith A. Lewis
• scheduling ... golf competition, trev
  • Re: scheduling ... golf competition, The Last Danish Pastry
  • Re: scheduling ... golf competition, Proginoskes
• Statistic class project, Przemek
• Topology Question, Martin Shobe
  • Re: Topology Question, José Carlos Santos
    • Re: Topology Question, Martin Shobe
  • Re: Topology Question, William Elliot
  • Re: Topology Question, Zundark
    • Re: Topology Question, William Elliot
      • Re: Topology Question, Stuart M Newberger
      • Message not available
      • Re: Topology Question, William Elliot
      • Re: Topology Question, Zundark
    • Re: Topology Question, Martin Shobe
• Orientation of boundary of manifold basic question......, James
• Basic manifolds question....., James
• may someone show me an example please, SU(2)
  • Re: may someone show me an example please, CP
  • Re: may someone show me an example please, William Elliot
  • Re: may someone show me an example please, xi
  • Re: may someone show me an example please, David C . Ullrich
  • Re: may someone show me an example please, Tony
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: may someone show me an example please, SU(2)
    • Re: may someone show me an example please, David C . Ullrich
  • Re: may someone show me an example please, SU(2)
    • Re: may someone show me an example please, David C . Ullrich
• A new cardinality function?, Anthony Buckland
  • Re: A new cardinality function?, Doni Ocena
    • Re: A new cardinality function?, Proginoskes
• one more help, wissam chemissany
  • Re: one more help, The World Wide Wade
• MacClaurin series help, hatchsea
  • Re: MacClaurin series help, Travis Willse
• Anyone know the source for this theorem, Dan Piponi
  • Re: Anyone know the source for this theorem, Proginoskes
  • Re: Anyone know the source for this theorem, Robert Israel
  • Re: Anyone know the source for this theorem, Gerry Myerson
    • Re: Anyone know the source for this theorem, Dan Piponi
• vector space question, John H Palmieri
  • Re: vector space question, Christopher J. Henrich
• Testing for product of Gaussians, newsquestions2003
  • Re: Testing for product of Gaussians, Stephen J. Herschkorn
    • Re: Testing for product of Gaussians, Herman Rubin
      • Re: Testing for product of Gaussians, newsquestions2003
  • Re: Testing for product of Gaussians, Herman Rubin
    • Re: Testing for product of Gaussians, newsquestions2003
• integration, Vec
  • Re: integration, Randy Poe
  • Re: integration, David Kastrup
  • Re: integration, Virgil
• Out( Aff(R) ) ?, Anton Greil
  • Re: Out( Aff(R) ) ?, David C . Ullrich
    • Re: Out( Aff(R) ) ?, Anton Greil
      • Re: Out( Aff(R) ) ?, Robert Israel
      • Re: Out( Aff(R) ) ?, Robert B. Israel
  • Re: Out( Aff(R) ) ?, Dave Rusin
    • Re: Out( Aff(R) ) ?, Alain Verghote
• Running Maple on Hyperthreading enabled CPU's, Boi
  • Re: Running Maple on Hyperthreading enabled CPU's, The Last Danish Pastry
    • [OT] Running Maple on Hyperthreading enabled CPU's, Boi
• students list problem, help me..., Sazan Suzan
• Re: Integrate exp(x^2)dx?? how to solve it, thank you., HarryKane
• every finite field is perfect, warren065
  • Re: every finite field is perfect, Proginoskes
    • Re: every finite field is perfect, warren065
      • Re: every finite field is perfect, W. Dale Hall
      • Re: every finite field is perfect,
  • Re: every finite field is perfect, Tonico
• Corolla... oh, never mind, Angus Rodgers
  • Re: Corolla... oh, never mind, imaginatorium
    • Re: Corolla... oh, never mind, Angus Rodgers
      • Re: Corolla... oh, never mind, Gerry Myerson
      • Re: Corolla... oh, never mind, Angus Rodgers
      • Re: Corolla... oh, never mind, Matt Gutting
• Summation over non-integers, Jon Slaughter
  • Re: Summation over non-integers, Virgil
    • Re: Summation over non-integers, Jon Slaughter
  • Re: Summation over non-integers, Stan Liou
  • Re: Summation over non-integers, A N Niel
  • Re: Summation over non-integers, Franēois Grondin
    • Re: Summation over non-integers, Jon Slaughter
• Einstein is my hero, Scott J. McCaughrin
  • Re: Einstein is my hero, flip
    • Re: Einstein is my hero, Amadeus Train-Owwell Zirconium
      • Re: Einstein is my hero, Amadeus Train-Owwell Zirconium
      • Re: Einstein is my hero, Amadeus Train-Owwell Zirconium
• JSH: Forcing my hand, jstevh
  • Re: JSH: Forcing my hand, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: JSH: Forcing my hand, jshsucks
  • Message not available
    • Re: JSH: Forcing my hand, N. Silver
  • Re: Forcing my hand, CP
  • Re: Forcing my hand, Jonny
  • Re: JSH: Forcing my hand, Jesse F. Hughes
    • Re: JSH: Forcing my hand, David Kastrup
  • Re: JSH: Forcing my hand, Proginoskes
  • Re: JSH: Forcing my hand, José Carlos Santos
    • Re: JSH: Forcing my hand, Jesse F. Hughes
  • Re: JSH: Forcing my hand, Giuseppe Bilotta
    • Re: JSH: Forcing my hand, Randy Poe
• Re: Call for Papers, Robert Kolker
• JSH: Three major results, jstevh
  • Re: JSH: Three major results, jshsucks
  • Re: JSH: Three major results, jstevh
    • Re: JSH: Three major results, Tim Peters
    • Re: JSH: Three major results, Jesse F. Hughes
    • Re: JSH: Three major results, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: JSH: Three major results, David Kastrup
      • Re: JSH: Three major results, Proginoskes
    • Re: JSH: Three major results, C. Bond
      • Re: JSH: Three major results, Gib Bogle
      • Re: JSH: Three major results, jstevh
      • Re: JSH: Three major results, David Kastrup
      • Re: JSH: Three major results, C. Bond
  • Re: JSH: Three major results, David Kastrup
  • Re: JSH: Three major results, W. Dale Hall
  • Re: JSH: Three major results, David C . Ullrich
    • Re: JSH: Three major results, Proginoskes
  • Re: Three major results, ošin
  • Re: JSH: Three major results, Christian Bau
  • Re: JSH: Three major results, Amadeus Train-Owwell Zirconium
  • Re: JSH: Three major results, Jim Spriggs
• Re: Goats on the island, David Kastrup
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Goats on the island, rich burge
• Canonical Jordan's form in Infinite Dimension?, Anderson Brasil
  • Re: Canonical Jordan's form in Infinite Dimension?, A N Niel
    • Re: Canonical Jordan's form in Infinite Dimension?, Anderson Brasil
• dual spaces:, vsgdp
  • Re: dual spaces:, José Carlos Santos
• Corollaries of the Monotone Convergence Theorem (II), Angus Rodgers
  • Re: Corollaries of the Monotone Convergence Theorem (II), Angus Rodgers
  • Re: Corollaries of the Monotone Convergence Theorem (II), David C . Ullrich
    • Re: Corollaries of the Monotone Convergence Theorem (II), Angus Rodgers
• module homomorphism's, Steve
  • Re: module homomorphism's, Marc Olschok
• Should I Major iin Mathematics?, Jschroet
  • Re: Should I Major iin Mathematics?, Neil W Rickert
  • Re: Should I Major iin Mathematics?, LD
  • Re: Should I Major iin Mathematics?, Dave Rusin
    • Re: Should I Major iin Mathematics?, Mitch Harris
      • Re: Should I Major iin Mathematics?, Dave Rusin
      • Re: Should I Major iin Mathematics?, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Should I Major iin Mathematics?, Russell
      • Re: Should I Major iin Mathematics?, Dave Rusin
      • Re: Should I Major iin Mathematics?, Russell
    • Re: Should I Major iin Mathematics?, A N Niel
    • Re: Should I Major iin Mathematics?, Van
      • Re: Should I Major iin Mathematics?, Lasse
      • Re: Should I Major iin Mathematics?, Toni Lassila
    • Re: Should I Major iin Mathematics?, LD
  • Re: Should I Major iin Mathematics?, A N Niel
  • Re: Should I Major iin Mathematics?, stush
    • Re: Should I Major iin Mathematics?, LD
  • Re: Should I Major iin Mathematics?, Ron Peterson
    • Re: Should I Major iin Mathematics?, Herman Rubin
      • Re: Should I Major iin Mathematics?, Ron Peterson
  • Re: Should I Major iin Mathematics?, N. Silver
    • Re: Should I Major iin Mathematics?, David Ames
      • Re: Should I Major iin Mathematics?, Herman Rubin
      • Re: Should I Major iin Mathematics?, David Ames
      • Re: Should I Major iin Mathematics?, Herman Rubin
  • Re: Should I Major iin Mathematics?, Anchor
  • Re: Should I Major iin Mathematics?, Keith Ramsay
    • Re: Should I Major iin Mathematics?, Dave Rusin
  • Re: Should I Major iin Mathematics?, Will Twentyman
  • Re: Should I Major iin Mathematics?, Ioannis
  • Re: Should I Major iin Mathematics?, Lawrence House
    • Re: Should I Major iin Mathematics?, xmp
  • Re: Should I Major iin Mathematics?, Jeremy Boden
• Calculus of variations question, A net user
  • Re: Calculus of variations question, David C . Ullrich
• Corollaries of the Monotone Convergence Theorem (I), Angus Rodgers
  • Re: Corollaries of the Monotone Convergence Theorem (I), David C . Ullrich
    • Re: Corollaries of the Monotone Convergence Theorem (I), Angus Rodgers
      • Re: Corollaries of the Monotone Convergence Theorem (I), David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Corollaries of the Monotone Convergence Theorem (I), Angus Rodgers
• Idiosyncratic (or idiotic?) notation for lim inf, etc., Angus Rodgers
  • Re: Idiosyncratic (or idiotic?) notation for lim inf, etc., David C . Ullrich
    • Re: Idiosyncratic (or idiotic?) notation for lim inf, etc., Angus Rodgers
      • Re: Idiosyncratic (or idiotic?) notation for lim inf, etc., Angus Rodgers
• why not sin:[0,1)->[0,1] ?, kj
  • Re: why not sin:[0,1)->[0,1] ?, bill
  • Re: why not sin:[0,1)->[0,1] ?, denis feldmann
  • Re: why not sin:[0,1)->[0,1] ?, Rouben Rostamian
  • Re: why not sin:[0,1)->[0,1] ?, The World Wide Wade
  • Re: why not sin:[0,1)->[0,1] ?, Termite of Tempation
    • Re: why not sin:[0,1)->[0,1] ?, Stan Liou
      • Re: why not sin:[0,1)->[0,1] ?, Stan Liou
  • Re: why not sin:[0,1)->[0,1] ?, N. Silver
    • Re: why not sin:[0,1)->[0,1] ?, The World Wide Wade
  • Re: why not sin:[0,1)->[0,1] ?, Bobby Simione
    • Re: why not sin:[0,1)->[0,1] ?, The World Wide Wade
      • Re: why not sin:[0,1)->[0,1] ?, Bobby Simione
• Archimedes and sqrt (3), luiroto
  • Re: Archimedes and sqrt (3), luiroto
• can anyone help with this problem, rupertmccallum
  • Re: can anyone help with this problem, Alain Verghote
    • Re: can anyone help with this problem, rupertmccallum
  • Re: can anyone help with this problem, JEMebius
• excel filtering, zim
  • Re: excel filtering, r.e.s.
  • Re: excel filtering, Ken Pledger
• infinity, Peter Fairbrother
• Is Prof. Milne serious?, Navin Kadambi
  • Re: Is Prof. Milne serious?, Zbigniew Fiedorowicz
    • Re: Is Prof. Milne serious?, Larry Hammick
      • Re: Is Prof. Milne serious?, Tonico
      • Re: Is Prof. Milne serious?, Navin Kadambi
      • Re: Is Prof. Milne serious?, Lee Rudolph
      • Re: Is Prof. Milne serious?, A N Niel
      • Re: Is Prof. Milne serious?, David Kastrup
      • Message not available
      • Re: Is Prof. Milne serious?, Amadeus Train-Owwell Zirconium
  • Re: Is Prof. Milne serious?, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
• How seriously do you take mathematics?, Mike H
  • Re: How seriously do you take mathematics?, Alain Verghote
  • Re: How seriously do you take mathematics?, Angus Rodgers
    • Re: How seriously do you take mathematics?, Ioannis
      • Re: How seriously do you take mathematics?, Jim Burns
      • Re: How seriously do you take mathematics?, Ioannis
      • Re: How seriously do you take mathematics?, Lash Rambo
      • Re: How seriously do you take mathematics?, Ioannis
      • Re: How seriously do you take mathematics?, Randy Poe
      • Re: How seriously do you take mathematics?, Lash Rambo
  • Re: How seriously do you take mathematics?, Herman Rubin
    • Re: How seriously do you take mathematics?, Michael Barr
      • Re: How seriously do you take mathematics?, Lee Rudolph
      • Re: How seriously do you take mathematics?, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
      • Re: How seriously do you take mathematics?, Herman Rubin
      • Re: How seriously do you take mathematics?, mattias_wikst71
      • Re: How seriously do you take mathematics?, Marc Olschok
      • Re: How seriously do you take mathematics?, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
  • Re: How seriously do you take mathematics?, John Bailey
    • Re: How seriously do you take mathematics?, Herman Rubin
      • Re: How seriously do you take mathematics?, John Bailey
      • Re: How seriously do you take mathematics?, Robin Chapman
    • Re: How seriously do you take mathematics?, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
  • Re: How seriously do you take mathematics?, Nora Baron
    • Message not available
      • Re: How seriously do you take mathematics?, Alain Verghote
      • Re: How seriously do you take mathematics?, John Smith
      • Re: How seriously do you take mathematics?, Bill Taylor
• advice for undergraduate publishing?, Stephen White
  • Re: advice for undergraduate publishing?, Zbigniew Fiedorowicz
  • Re: advice for undergraduate publishing?, Dave Rusin
• is a 4.0 GPA more harm than good for u.g. mathematics?, Stephen White
  • Re: is a 4.0 GPA more harm than good for u.g. mathematics?, A N Niel
    • Re: is a 4.0 GPA more harm than good for u.g. mathematics?, Herman Rubin
  • Re: is a 4.0 GPA more harm than good for u.g. mathematics?, Proginoskes
  • Re: is a 4.0 GPA more harm than good for u.g. mathematics?, David C . Ullrich
    • Re: is a 4.0 GPA more harm than good for u.g. mathematics?, The World Wide Wade
• Need Help With A Vector Equation, jclause
  • Re: Need Help With A Vector Equation, jclause
  • Re: Need Help With A Vector Equation, Lynn Kurtz
    • Re: Need Help With A Vector Equation, jclause
  • Re: Need Help With A Vector Equation, Ari
    • Re: Need Help With A Vector Equation, jclause
• Discrete Math Base 10 brain teaser, rammer202
  • Re: Discrete Math Base 10 brain teaser, Andy Watkins
• Factorials, rammer202
  • Re: Factorials, khkwa
  • Re: Factorials, tom . s . smith
  • Re: Factorials, Justin Young
  • Re: Factorials, Ulysse Keller
  • Re: Factorials, Ulysse Keller
    • Re: Factorials, Alain Verghote
• Gambler brain teaser, rammer202
  • Re: Gambler brain teaser, Andy Watkins
  • Re: Gambler brain teaser, Keith A. Lewis
    • Re: Gambler brain teaser, Andy Watkins
• Congruence quesiton, rammer202
  • Re: Congruence quesiton, William Elliot
• JSH: Tag along society, jstevh
  • Re: JSH: Tag along society, jshsucks
    • Re: JSH: Tag along society, ošin
      • Re: JSH: Tag along society, Proginoskes
    • Re: JSH: Tag along society, Gib Bogle
  • Re: JSH: Tag along society, Randy Poe
  • Re: JSH: Tag along society, C. Bond
  • Re: JSH: Tag along society, Justin
    • Re: JSH: Tag along society, Proginoskes
      • Re: JSH: Tag along society, Jesse F. Hughes
  • Re: JSH: Tag along society, fishfry
  • Re: JSH: Tag along society, Jesse F. Hughes
  • Re: JSH: Tag along society, Proginoskes
    • Re: JSH: Tag along society, Jesse F. Hughes
    • Re: JSH: Tag along society, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: JSH: Tag along society, Proginoskes
  • Re: JSH: Tag along society, Mark Atherton
    • Re: JSH: Tag along society, David Kastrup
    • Re: JSH: Tag along society, jstevh
      • Re: JSH: Tag along society, David Kastrup
      • Re: JSH: Tag along society, José Carlos Santos
      • Re: JSH: Tag along society, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: JSH: Tag along society, Mark Atherton
      • Re: JSH: Tag along society, Proginoskes
      • Re: JSH: Tag along society, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: JSH: Tag along society, Jesse F. Hughes
• Affine Geometry, eml13297
  • Re: Affine Geometry, Timothy Murphy
    • Re: Affine Geometry, Lee Rudolph
    • Re: Affine Geometry, eml13297
      • Re: Affine Geometry, LD
      • Re: Affine Geometry, eml13297
• Differentiating a Log Sum of Gaussians, Adam Hartshorne
  • Re: Differentiating a Log Sum of Gaussians, Adam Hartshorne
• 15 puzzle minimum moves approximation question, Rick D .
  • Re: 15 puzzle minimum moves approximation question, Jaap
    • Re: 15 puzzle minimum moves approximation question, Hugo Pfoertner
• Re: Factoring, SF, and transforms, Jesse F. Hughes
• There are..., Lynn Kurtz
  • Re: There are..., The Ghost In The Machine
• j, jclause
  • Re: j, Hero
• analysis/topology question, vsgdp
  • Re: analysis/topology question, José Carlos Santos
    • Re: analysis/topology question, José Carlos Santos
  • Re: analysis/topology question, A N Niel
  • Re: analysis/topology question, William Elliot
• Integrals of forms question...., James
  • Re: Integrals of forms question...., David C . Ullrich
  • Re: Integrals of forms question...., W. Dale Hall
• how to deal with the algebra problem?, SU(2)
  • Re: how to deal with the algebra problem?, The Qurqirish Dragon
  • Re: how to deal with the algebra problem?, Bill Dubuque
  • Re: how to deal with the algebra problem?, Dave Rusin
• Only 2 kind of vector spaces?, fukkicini
  • Re: Only 2 kind of vector spaces?, José Carlos Santos
• Extension field (GALOIS) with NTL Library, Claudio
• Re: Product-Simplifaction, José Carlos Santos
• a number of pythagorean tripples, harold
  • Re: a number of pythagorean tripples, José Carlos Santos
    • Re: a number of pythagorean tripples, Matt Gutting
  • Re: a number of pythagorean tripples - serious answer, Matt Gutting
    • Re: a number of pythagorean tripples - serious answer, Martin
  • Re: a number of pythagorean tripples, Lawrence House
    • Re: a number of pythagorean tripples, Virgil
      • Re: a number of pythagorean tripples, Daniel W. Johnson
      • Re: a number of pythagorean tripples, Virgil
      • Re: a number of pythagorean tripples, Oscar Lanzi III
    • Re: a number of pythagorean tripples, Hugo Pfoertner
• History of friday the 13th, harold
  • Re: History of friday the 13th, Dirk Van de moortel
  • Re: History of friday the 13th, Saint Cad
• Do you want to review my extremely elementary introduction to Lie groups?, Jeffrey Emanuel
  • Re: Do you want to review my extremely elementary introduction to Lie groups?, José Carlos Santos
    • Re: Do you want to review my extremely elementary introduction to Lie groups?, Jeffrey Emanuel
      • Re: Do you want to review my extremely elementary introduction to Lie groups?, Angus Rodgers
      • Re: Do you want to review my extremely elementary introduction to Lie groups?, José Carlos Santos
• to ma'am lea, gpjjgm@xxxxxxxxx
• What is the greatest error ever committed in math?, romy_alexis
  • Re: What is the greatest error ever committed in math?, yang mills
  • Re: What is the greatest error ever committed in math?, Tonico
    • Re: What is the greatest error ever committed in math?, G.E. Ivey
  • Re: What is the greatest error ever committed in math?, Proginoskes
    • Re: What is the greatest error ever committed in math?, denis feldmann
  • Re: What is the greatest error ever committed in math?, Larry Hammick
  • Re: What is the greatest error ever committed in math?, Oscar Lanzi III
  • Re: What is the greatest error ever committed in math?, Angus Rodgers
  • Re: What is the greatest error ever committed in math?, Dan in Philly
    • Re: What is the greatest error ever committed in math?, James Buddenhagen
      • Re: What is the greatest error ever committed in math?, Tony
      • Re: What is the greatest error ever committed in math?, Gerry Myerson
      • Re: What is the greatest error ever committed in math?, Tony
  • Re: What is the greatest error ever committed in math?, Victor Eijkhout
    • Re: What is the greatest error ever committed in math?, Hero
      • Re: What is the greatest error ever committed in math?, luiroto
  • Re: What is the greatest error ever committed in math?, Michael Barr
  • Re: What is the greatest error ever committed in math?, Bobby Simione
  • Re: What is the greatest error ever committed in math?, b92057
    • Re: What is the greatest error ever committed in math?, Robert Israel
      • Re: What is the greatest error ever committed in math?, luiroto
      • Re: What is the greatest error ever committed in math?, Chip Eastham
      • Re: What is the greatest error ever committed in math?, Robert Israel
      • Re: What is the greatest error ever committed in math?, Dave Seaman
      • Re: What is the greatest error ever committed in math?, denis feldmann
      • Re: What is the greatest error ever committed in math?, Bobby Simione
      • Re: What is the greatest error ever committed in math?, ray_sitf
      • Re: What is the greatest error ever committed in math?, Dave Rusin
      • Re: What is the greatest error ever committed in math?, Robert Israel
      • Re: What is the greatest error ever committed in math?, Jim Spriggs
      • Re: What is the greatest error ever committed in math?, b92057
  • Re: What is the greatest error ever committed in math?, john_ramsden
    • Re: What is the greatest error ever committed in math?, Robert Israel
      • Re: What is the greatest error ever committed in math?, Narasimham G.L.
  • Re: What is the greatest error ever committed in math?, Stacey Whaley
  • Re: What is the greatest error ever committed in math?, David Ames
  • Re: What is the greatest error ever committed in math?, bill . daly
    • Re: What is the greatest error ever committed in math?, Proginoskes
  • Re: What is the greatest error ever committed in math?, john_ramsden
  • Re: What is the greatest error ever committed in math?, Narasimham G.L.
    • Re: What is the greatest error ever committed in math?, Proginoskes
• IN vs UN, CababasayL
  • Re: IN vs UN, haroldpaykwa
    • Re: IN vs UN, Ari
  • Re: IN vs UN, haroldpaykwa
    • Re: IN vs UN, Ari
  • Re: IN vs UN, William Elliot
• Proofs, jtl716
  • Re: Proofs, Tonico
• Virus, jtl716
  • Re: Virus, Proginoskes
  • Re: Virus, The Ghost In The Machine
• mga B's Sabat kamo!!!!!!!!!!!11, haroldpaykwa
• how friendly are friendly numbers, harold
• just..., gpjjgm@xxxxxxxxx
• HI GUYS!!! here's how u do when u want to post a topic..., jiggerface
  • Re: HI GUYS!!! here's how u do when u want to post a topic..., Proginoskes
  • Re: HI GUYS!!! here's how u do when u want to post a topic..., C. Bond
• Re-Math 299 University of the philippines students.pls reply, arnelpelonia
  • Re: Re-Math 299 University of the philippines students.pls reply, jiggerface
  • Re: Re-Math 299 University of the philippines students.pls reply, fdimzon
  • Re: Re-Math 299 University of the philippines students.pls reply, jtl716
• is infinite countable or uncountable?, harold
  • Re: is infinite countable or uncountable?, Virgil
    • Re: is infinite countable or uncountable?, haroldpaykwa
      • Re: is infinite countable or uncountable?, Proginoskes
      • Re: is infinite countable or uncountable?, denis feldmann
      • Re: is infinite countable or uncountable?, Abraham Buckingham
  • Re: is infinite countable or uncountable?, Will Twentyman
  • Re: is infinite countable or uncountable?, albstorz
  • Re: is infinite countable or uncountable?, Keith Ramsay
  • Re: is infinite countable or uncountable?, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
  • Re: is infinite countable or uncountable?, Daniel W. Johnson
• Math 299-2005 Students Reply to this please...., Francis D. Dimzon
  • Re: Math 299-2005 Students Reply to this please...., jiggerface
  • Re: Math 299-2005 Students Reply to this please...., jiggerface
  • Re: Math 299-2005 Students Reply to this please...., jiggerface
  • Re: Math 299-2005 Students Reply to this please...., roy_elbao
  • Re: Math 299-2005 Students Reply to this please...., bingley_cc
  • Re: Math 299-2005 Students Reply to this please...., romy_alexis
  • Re: Math 299-2005 Students Reply to this please...., jtl716
    • Re: Math 299-2005 Students Reply to this please...., roy_elbao
  • Re: Math 299-2005 Students Reply to this please...., dfvtoledo
    • Re: Math 299-2005 Students Reply to this please...., deaj_78
  • Re: Math 299-2005 Students Reply to this please...., jsfn_cn
  • Re: Math 299-2005 Students Reply to this please...., engrgicano
    • Re: Math 299-2005 Students Reply to this please...., engrgicano
  • Re: Math 299-2005 Students Reply to this please...., lolitagmanejero
  • Re: Math 299-2005 Students Reply to this please...., lolitagmanejero
  • Re: Math 299-2005 Students Reply to this please...., lolitagmanejero
  • Re: Math 299-2005 Students Reply to this please...., deaj_78
  • Re: Math 299-2005 Students Reply to this please...., haroldpaykwa
  • Re: Math 299-2005 Students Reply to this please...., arnelpelonia
    • Math 299-2005 Students Reply, William Elliot
      • Re: Math 299-2005 Students Reply, David Kastrup
      • Re: Math 299-2005 Students Reply, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Math 299-2005 Students Reply, Angus Rodgers
  • Re: Math 299-2005 Students Reply to this please...., jsfn_cn
  • Re: Math 299-2005 Students Reply to this please...., lolitagmanejero
  • Re: Math 299-2005 Students Reply to this please...., lolitagmanejero
  • Re: Math 299-2005 Students Reply to this please...., lolitagmanejero
  • Re: Math 299-2005 Students Reply to this please...., gpjjgm
    • Re: Math 299-2005 Students Reply to this please...., Ari
  • Re: Math 299-2005 Students Reply to this please...., Will Twentyman
    • Re: Math 299-2005 Students Reply to this please...., fdimzon
• Rates fixed, "Donald Cummings"
• Scheid's _Zahlentheorie_ (3rd. ed) and the random sieve, Paul Pollack
• Combinatorics question., Binesh Bannerjee
  • Re: Combinatorics question., Tim Peters
  • Re: Combinatorics question., Carl K. Woll
• Convergence on Hardy spaces, bryant_j_j
  • Re: Convergence on Hardy spaces, David C . Ullrich
    • Re: Convergence on Hardy spaces, bryant_j_j
      • Re: Convergence on Hardy spaces, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Convergence on Hardy spaces, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Convergence on Hardy spaces, bryant_j_j
      • Re: Convergence on Hardy spaces, bryant_j_j
      • Re: Convergence on Hardy spaces, David C . Ullrich
• Saunders MacLane, steve_wildstrom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Saunders MacLane, Arturo Magidin
  • Re: Saunders MacLane, Keith Ramsay
    • Re: Saunders MacLane, Dave Rusin
      • Re: Saunders MacLane, Keith Ramsay
      • Re: Saunders MacLane, Keith Ramsay
  • Re: Saunders MacLane, menno
  • Re: Saunders MacLane, rickO
• Redistancing, Santosh Hemchandra
• L1 inequality, windfull
  • Re: L1 inequality, A N Niel
    • Re: L1 inequality, windfull
      • Re: L1 inequality, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: L1 inequality, flyaway
      • Re: L1 inequality, David C . Ullrich
    • Re: L1 inequality, apple
      • Re: L1 inequality, windfull
      • Re: L1 inequality, G.E. Ivey
      • Re: L1 inequality, windfull
• eigenvalues, windfull
  • Re: eigenvalues, Ulysse Keller
• The next big thing from math., djshadoworgandonor
  • Re: The next big thing from math., ošin
  • Re: The next big thing from math., William Elliot
    • Re: The next big thing from math., yang mills
      • Re: The next big thing from math., William Elliot
      • Re: The next big thing from math., Ari
      • Re: The next big thing from math., yang mills
  • Re: The next big thing from math., Larry Hammick
• An interesting coloring problem, can anyone help?, fhzhang
  • Re: An interesting coloring problem, can anyone help?, Proginoskes
    • Re: An interesting coloring problem, can anyone help?, fhzhang
  • Re: An interesting coloring problem, can anyone help?, Proginoskes
    • Re: An interesting coloring problem, can anyone help?, fhzhang
      • Re: An interesting coloring problem, can anyone help?, Proginoskes
• how to learn how to do mathematics., Sukjah Roh
  • Re: how to learn how to do mathematics., Larry Hammick
  • Re: how to learn how to do mathematics., Stephen
    • Re: how to learn how to do mathematics., G. A. Edgar
• Subsets of a given cardinality, rkam2001
  • Re: Subsets of a given cardinality, Herman Rubin
  • Re: Subsets of a given cardinality, Arturo Magidin
    • Re: Subsets of a given cardinality, rkam2001
      • Re: Subsets of a given cardinality, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: Subsets of a given cardinality, rkam2001
      • Re: Subsets of a given cardinality, Arturo Magidin
  • Re: Subsets of a given cardinality, Stephen J. Herschkorn
    • Re: Subsets of a given cardinality, rkam2001
• Java Package for Calculus, clemenr
• Thank you, I got it!, questioner
• Statistics/polling question, darrin_p_s
• Re: SF: Areas of confusion, infinity, Jesse F. Hughes
  • Re: SF: Areas of confusion, infinity, Proginoskes
    • Re: SF: Areas of confusion, infinity, Jesse F. Hughes
• Re: Crossing boundaries, math people invade, Jesse F. Hughes
• MSc Bioinformatics, allan tucker
• Re: How to say mathematic expression?, Megan
  • Re: How to say mathematic expression?, David Kastrup
  • Re: How to say mathematic expression?, Dirk Van de moortel
    • Re: How to say mathematic expression?, G. A. Edgar
      • Re: How to say mathematic expression?, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: How to say mathematic expression?, Bart Goddard
      • Re: How to say mathematic expression?, G. A. Edgar
      • Re: How to say mathematic expression?, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Message not available
      • Re: How to say mathematic expression?, G. A. Edgar
    • Re: How to say mathematic expression?, Stephen J. Herschkorn
  • Re: How to say mathematic expression?, Peter Webb
  • Re: How to say mathematic expression?,
• JSH: No cover at the end, jstevh
  • Re: JSH: No cover at the end, David Kastrup
  • Re: JSH: No cover at the end, bryant_j_j
  • Re: JSH: No cover at the end, Felix Rawlings
  • Re: JSH: No cover at the end, C. Bond
    • Re: Generating polyhedron vertices, Laurence Finston
  • Re: JSH: No cover at the end, Lash Rambo
  • Re: No cover at the end, ošin
  • Re: JSH: No cover at the end, k19688691
  • Re: JSH: No cover at the end, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: No cover at the end, Tim Peters
  • Re: No cover at the end, Vancouver
• Astrophysics for Megalomaniacs :-), Hauke Reddmann
  • Re: Astrophysics for Megalomaniacs :-), William Elliot
    • Re: Astrophysics for Megalomaniacs :-), mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Astrophysics for Megalomaniacs :-), Larry Hammick
      • Re: Astrophysics for Megalomaniacs :-), mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Astrophysics for Megalomaniacs :-), William Elliot
      • Re: Astrophysics for Megalomaniacs :-), mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Astrophysics for Megalomaniacs :-), William Elliot
      • Re: Astrophysics for Megalomaniacs :-), mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Astrophysics for Megalomaniacs :-), William Elliot
      • Re: Astrophysics for Megalomaniacs :-), Joseph Hertzlinger
    • Re: Astrophysics for Megalomaniacs :-), Joseph Hertzlinger
      • Astrophysics for Megalomaniacs :-), William Elliot
  • Re: Astrophysics for Megalomaniacs :-), Joseph Hertzlinger
    • Re: Astrophysics for Megalomaniacs :-), Hauke Reddmann
• A question in the book of Conway, "Functions of One Comple Variable", questioner
  • Re: A question in the book of Conway, "Functions of One Comple Variable", Ron Sperber
    • Re: A question in the book of Conway, "Functions of One Comple Variable", questioner
  • Re: A question in the book of Conway, "Functions of One Comple Variable", David C . Ullrich
• Orthogonal matrices and determinants, Willem H. de Boer
  • Re: Orthogonal matrices and determinants, Willem H. de Boer
    • Re: Orthogonal matrices and determinants, Willem H. de Boer
      • Re: Orthogonal matrices and determinants, Randy Poe
      • Re: Orthogonal matrices and determinants, Zbigniew Fiedorowicz
      • Re: Orthogonal matrices and determinants, Randy Poe
      • Re: Orthogonal matrices and determinants, Robert Israel
      • Re: Orthogonal matrices and determinants, Dik T. Winter
      • Re: Orthogonal matrices and determinants, Robert Israel
    • Re: Orthogonal matrices and determinants, The World Wide Wade
• Lagrange multiplier method: a question, Giuseppe Bilotta
  • Re: Lagrange multiplier method: a question, Alois Steindl
  • Re: Lagrange multiplier method: a question, Dirk Van de moortel
    • Re: Lagrange multiplier method: a question, Dirk Van de moortel
    • Re: Lagrange multiplier method: a question, Giuseppe Bilotta
      • Re: Lagrange multiplier method: a question, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Lagrange multiplier method: a question, Giuseppe Bilotta
• Practical importance of future mathematics, djshadoworgandonor
  • Re: Practical importance of future mathematics, William Elliot
  • Re: Practical importance of future mathematics, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
    • Re: Practical importance of future mathematics, William Elliot
• Introduce a New math forum ----www.bossh.net ----in China, ???????? BossH.NET
  • Re: Introduce a New math forum ----www.bossh.net ----in China, ???????? BossH.NET
• Need help with set form proof, agapito6314
  • Re: Need help with set form proof, Will Twentyman
• transformation of a random variable, Bob
  • Re: transformation of a random variable, bryant_j_j
    • Re: transformation of a random variable, Bob
• Eigenvalues of the the tensor product of two mappings?, Stephen White
  • Re: Eigenvalues of the the tensor product of two mappings?, Igor Khavkine
    • Re: Eigenvalues of the the tensor product of two mappings?, Stephen White
• Re: OT anyone familiar with quicksort, patrick
• Primary decomposition of modules and Elementary divisors, jnf and rcf., Steve
  • Re: Primary decomposition of modules and Elementary divisors, jnf and rcf., Larry Hammick
• conditional probablility, windfull
  • Re: conditional probablility, patrick
  • Re: conditional probablility, Stephen J. Herschkorn
    • Re: conditional probablility, windfull
    • Re: conditional probablility, windfull
      • Re: conditional probablility, A N Niel
      • Re: conditional probablility, windfull
  • Re: conditional probablility, windfull
• Eigenvalues relationship between similar circulant matrices, shawroom_124_youknow
  • Re: Eigenvalues relationship between similar circulant matrices, Robert Israel
    • Re: Eigenvalues relationship between similar circulant matrices, shawroom_124_youknow
• Field Extensions, jamesdickerson00
  • Re: Field Extensions, Arturo Magidin
  • Re: Field Extensions, Jyrki Lahtonen
    • Re: Field Extensions, Arturo Magidin
• Another poker probability problem, Chuck
  • Re: Another poker probability problem, N. Silver
    • Re: Another poker probability problem, Chuck
    • Re: Another poker probability problem, Lash Rambo
      • Re: Another poker probability problem, Virgil
      • Re: Another poker probability problem, Lash Rambo
      • Re: Another poker probability problem, N. Silver
  • Re: Another poker probability problem, Keith A. Lewis
    • Re: Another poker probability problem, Chuck
      • Re: Another poker probability problem, Keith A. Lewis
      • Re: Another poker probability problem, Chuck
• Rabin-Miller test, don_dieguito
  • Re: Rabin-Miller test, Larry Hammick
• MathWorld, Ioannis
  • Re: MathWorld, David W . Cantrell
  • Re: MathWorld, Proginoskes
    • Re: MathWorld, David W . Cantrell
  • Re: MathWorld, eww
• Is there a name for this type of function?, pi2ovr6
  • Re: Is there a name for this type of function?, Proginoskes
    • Re: Is there a name for this type of function?, Matthew Brenneman
• Can you prove that 2^omega < 2^omega_1?, rkam2001
  • Re: Can you prove that 2^omega < 2^omega_1?, Stan Liou
    • Re: Can you prove that 2^omega < 2^omega_1?, rkam2001
    • Re: Can you prove that 2^omega < 2^omega_1?, A N Niel
      • Re: Can you prove that 2^omega < 2^omega_1?, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: Can you prove that 2^omega < 2^omega_1?, rkam2001
      • Re: Can you prove that 2^omega < 2^omega_1?, rkam2001
      • Re: Can you prove that 2^omega < 2^omega_1?, rkam2001
• Difficult Math Problem, mathe
  • Re: Difficult Math Problem, Stan Liou
    • Re: Difficult Math Problem, Arturo Magidin
  • Re: Difficult Math Problem, Arturo Magidin
• (linear algebra) symmetric matrix, SU(2)
  • Re: (linear algebra) symmetric matrix, Eric J. Wingler
• Who can inform me., luiroto
  • Re: Who can inform me., A N Niel
• rate of convergence problem, Craig Feinstein
  • Re: rate of convergence problem, Stan Liou
    • Re: rate of convergence problem, Craig Feinstein
  • Re: rate of convergence problem, Eric J. Wingler
• Sum to n terms, mitch
  • Re: Sum to n terms, Stan Liou
    • Re: Sum to n terms, Stan Liou
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Sum to n terms, SU(2)
    • Re: Sum to n terms, mitch
• Re: Differential equation problem, Stan Liou
• Invisible Solids, Bjørn Hee
• topological sort with bidirected graphs, Boris
  • Re: topological sort with bidirected graphs, Martin
    • Re: topological sort with bidirected graphs, Boris
• multi-variables derivative, SU(2)
  • Re: multi-variables derivative, David C . Ullrich
• Graph reduction problem, Toni Lassila
  • Re: Graph reduction problem, David Eppstein
• nitistic methods ??, not_here . 5 . species8350
  • Re: nitistic methods ??, David C . Ullrich
    • Re: nitistic methods ??, species8350
  • Re: nitistic methods ??, G. A. Edgar
    • Re: nitistic methods ??, species8350
• Quantitative & Qualitative Math applied to Intelligenct Units., Zim Olson
• Lowest rates in 45 years, "Madge Ware"
• Complete Solution ODE, mojo
  • Re: Complete Solution ODE, Lynn Kurtz
• doubts on vector spaces, ramakrishnan . kannan
  • Re: doubts on vector spaces, Larry Hammick
  • Re: doubts on vector spaces, William Elliot
  • Re: doubts on vector spaces, Marian Minar
  • Re: doubts on vector spaces, Abraham Buckingham
  • Re: doubts on vector spaces, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
• Group algebras, decompositions question..., Tony
  • Re: Group algebras, decompositions question..., Ulysse Keller
    • Re: Group algebras, decompositions question..., Tony
      • Re: Group algebras, decompositions question..., Zbigniew Fiedorowicz
      • Re: Group algebras, decompositions question..., W. Dale Hall
      • Re: Group algebras, decompositions question..., Ulysse Keller
• combinatorial puzzle, Bikash Agarwalla
  • Re: combinatorial puzzle, William Elliot
    • Re: combinatorial puzzle, Lash Rambo
      • Re: combinatorial puzzle, Bikash Agarwalla
      • Re: combinatorial puzzle, William Elliot
      • Re: combinatorial puzzle, Lash Rambo
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Combinatorial Puzzle, Bikash K Agarwalla
    • Re: Combinatorial Puzzle, Chip Eastham
    • Re: Combinatorial Puzzle, Tim Peters
• How do I sum this infinite series?, Josh Morel
  • Re: How do I sum this infinite series?, Zdislav V. Kovarik
  • Re: How do I sum this infinite series?, pi
  • Re: How do I sum this infinite series?, Proginoskes
  • Re: How do I sum this infinite series?, Ulysse Keller
• RayRay Game - Graph Theory?, triplezero
  • Re: RayRay Game - Graph Theory?, Will Twentyman
    • Re: RayRay Game - Graph Theory?, Will Twentyman
    • Re: RayRay Game - Graph Theory?, Philippe 92
      • Re: RayRay Game - Graph Theory?, jaapsch
      • Re: RayRay Game - Graph Theory?, Philippe 92
  • Re: RayRay Game - Graph Theory?, Proginoskes
• Quick Question on Integer Division, jbarbero
  • Re: Quick Question on Integer Division, Philippe 92
    • Re: Quick Question on Integer Division, Bart Goddard
      • Re: Quick Question on Integer Division, David Kastrup
      • Re: Quick Question on Integer Division, Philippe 92
      • Re: Quick Question on Integer Division, jbarbero
      • Re: Quick Question on Integer Division, Philippe 92
      • Re: Quick Question on Integer Division, jbarbero
      • Re: Quick Question on Integer Division, Proginoskes
      • Re: Quick Question on Integer Division, jbarbero
  • Re: Quick Question on Integer Division, Randy Poe
  • Re: Quick Question on Integer Division, Proginoskes
    • Re: Quick Question on Integer Division, Giuseppe Bilotta
  • Re: Quick Question on Integer Division, Spamless
  • Re: Quick Question on Integer Division, Ulysse Keller
• FPTAS, jumpstart
  • Re: FPTAS, A N Niel
  • Re: FPTAS, Proginoskes
    • Re: FPTAS, jumpstart
• "Fieldoid", Ioannis
  • Re: "Fieldoid", achava
• homomorphism, nonton
  • Re: homomorphism, Arturo Magidin
    • Re: homomorphism, nonton
      • Re: homomorphism, Arturo Magidin
• Is the ratio of logs of primes always irrational?, Robert Adams
  • Re: Is the ratio of logs of primes always irrational?, A N Niel
  • Re: Is the ratio of logs of primes always irrational?, Zdislav V. Kovarik
    • Re: Is the ratio of logs of primes always irrational?, Robert Adams
• Calculating quartiles, Bob
  • Re: Calculating quartiles, Proginoskes
    • Re: Calculating quartiles, bob_binz
• Determining an ellipse, Hop David
  • Re: Determining an ellipse, A N Niel
    • Re: Determining an ellipse, Hop David
      • Re: Determining an ellipse, Philippe 92
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Determining an ellipse, Hop David
      • Re: Determining an ellipse, Virgil
      • Re: Determining an ellipse, Hop David
      • Re: Determining an ellipse, Virgil
      • Re: Determining an ellipse, Hop David
      • Re: Determining an ellipse, Virgil
  • Re: Determining an ellipse, Stephen J. Herschkorn
• Where can I find math classes?, watha
  • Re: Where can I find math classes?, vsgdp
    • Re: Where can I find math classes?, Bill97
  • Re: Where can I find math classes?, Abraham Buckingham
  • Re: Where can I find math classes?, Karl M. Bunday
• a and b in G, then a*b in G?, tom
  • Re: a and b in G, then a*b in G?, Tonico
    • Re: a and b in G, then a*b in G?, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: a and b in G, then a*b in G?, Tonico
      • Re: a and b in G, then a*b in G?, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: a and b in G, then a*b in G?, Tonico
      • Re: a and b in G, then a*b in G?, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: a and b in G, then a*b in G?,
      • Re: a and b in G, then a*b in G?, David McAnally
      • Re: a and b in G, then a*b in G?, Daniel W. Johnson
      • Re: a and b in G, then a*b in G?, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: a and b in G, then a*b in G?, Daniel W. Johnson
      • Re: a and b in G, then a*b in G?, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: a and b in G, then a*b in G?, Daniel W. Johnson
      • Re: a and b in G, then a*b in G?,
      • Re: a and b in G, then a*b in G?, Tonico
      • Re: a and b in G, then a*b in G?, Arturo Magidin
  • Re: a and b in G, then a*b in G?, Arturo Magidin
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: a and b in G, then a*b in G?, grimster
• linear map, show that kernel is trivial?, grimster
  • Re: linear map, show that kernel is trivial?, Tonico
    • Re: linear map, show that kernel is trivial?, grimster
    • Re: linear map, show that kernel is trivial?, grimster
• Question L1 with counting measure, Benjamin
  • Re: Question L1 with counting measure, David C . Ullrich
• base for infinite dimensional space, mathlover
  • Re: base for infinite dimensional space, Stephen J. Herschkorn
  • Re: base for infinite dimensional space, David C . Ullrich
  • Re: base for infinite dimensional space, G. A. Edgar
• abelian groups problems in Hungerford, Sukjah Roh
  • Re: abelian groups problems in Hungerford, Sukjah Roh
  • Re: abelian groups problems in Hungerford, E. Romeo-de Louvigny
  • Re: abelian groups problems in Hungerford, Arturo Magidin
    • Re: abelian groups problems in Hungerford,
  • Re: abelian groups problems in Hungerford, Paul Sperry
    • Re: abelian groups problems in Hungerford, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: abelian groups problems in Hungerford, Paul Sperry
      • Re: abelian groups problems in Hungerford, Arturo Magidin
• open source maple equivalent, Jeff Kish
  • Re: open source maple equivalent, Igor Khavkine
    • Re: open source maple equivalent, Jeff Kish
• Cubic oscillator., kurdayon
  • Re: Cubic oscillator., Phil Freedenberg
    • Re: Cubic oscillator., kurdayon
      • Re: Cubic oscillator., Rod
      • Re: Cubic oscillator., Zbigniew Fiedorowicz
      • Re: Cubic oscillator., Robert Israel
      • Re: Cubic oscillator., kurdayon
      • Re: Cubic oscillator., Zbigniew Fiedorowicz
• unknown notation, Pierre
  • Re: unknown notation, A N Niel
• [OT] Quotation, Larry Hammick
  • Re: [OT] Quotation, Angus Rodgers
  • Re: [OT] Quotation, William Elliot
    • Re: [OT] Quotation, Larry Hammick
    • Re: [OT] Quotation, Tim Little
      • Re: [OT] Quotation, William Elliot
      • Re: [OT] Quotation, David Kastrup
      • Re: [OT] Quotation, William Elliot
• What is the meaning of 'local property'?, JJ Lee
  • Re: What is the meaning of 'local property'?, Jyrki Lahtonen
    • Re: What is the meaning of 'local property'?, Proginoskes
      • Re: What is the meaning of 'local property'?, Zdislav V. Kovarik
  • Re: What is the meaning of 'local property'?, Larry Hammick
  • Re: What is the meaning of 'local property'?, David C . Ullrich
  • Re: What is the meaning of 'local property'?, Zdislav V. Kovarik
  • Re: What is the meaning of 'local property'?, Dave Rusin
  • Re: What is the meaning of 'local property'?, achava
    • Re: What is the meaning of 'local property'?, William Elliot
  • Re: What is the meaning of 'local property'?, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
• Looking for conference proceedings..., yer mammy
  • Re: Looking for conference proceedings..., Proginoskes
  • Re: Looking for conference proceedings..., Gerry Myerson
    • Re: Looking for conference proceedings..., yer mammy
• question on multivariate cauchy distribution, Roy
  • Re: question on multivariate cauchy distribution, Herman Rubin
• jordan homomorphism, echo
  • Re: jordan homomorphism, Ulysse Keller
• Help with Symbols, ubccis
  • Re: Help with Symbols, Proginoskes
    • Re: Help with Symbols, bigoxygen
• New Mathematical Formula?, Jon Slaughter
  • Re: New Mathematical Formula?, Jon Slaughter
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: New mathematical formula?, Phil Freedenberg
• p^2 = a^2+b^2+c^2, Don Reble
  • Re: p^2 = a^2+b^2+c^2, Gerry Myerson
    • Re: p^2 = a^2+b^2+c^2, Don Reble
      • Re: p^2 = a^2+b^2+c^2, Gerry Myerson
      • Re: p^2 = a^2+b^2+c^2, Gerry Myerson
  • Re: p^2 = a^2+b^2+c^2, Paul Pollack
• Re: K[x]/I = map(n,k) . proving isomorphism(sci work), grimster
  • Re: K[x]/I = map(n,k) . proving isomorphism(sci work), W. Dale Hall
• Re: say I flip a coin 100 times..., Tony
  • Re: say I flip a coin 100 times..., HERC777
• JSH: Dear Math People..., ošin
  • Re: Dear Math People..., ošin
  • Re: JSH: Dear Math People..., Will Twentyman
    • Re: JSH: Dear Math People..., Jonny
      • Re: JSH: Dear Math People..., Will Twentyman
• Re: Karl Marx on the "derivated" function, Thomas Nordhaus
  • Re: Karl Marx on the "derivated" function, Hero
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Karl Marx on the "derivated" function, Larry Hammick
    • Re: Karl Marx on the "derivated" function, Peter Niessen
    • Re: Karl Marx on the "derivated" function, Hero
• Quality of Service Routing for Supporting Multimedia Applications --help me in math, jumpstart
• triple integral 2, wissam chemissany
  • Re: triple integral 2, A N Niel
    • Re: triple integral 2, wissam chemissany
• triple integral 1, wissam chemissany
• weird integral, legomir2000
  • Re: weird integral, Madhusudan Singh
• algebra again, nonton
  • Re: algebra again, Arturo Magidin
    • Re: algebra again, nonton
      • Re: algebra again, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: algebra again, nonton
      • Re: algebra again, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: algebra again, nonton
    • Re: algebra again, nonton
  • Re: algebra again, nonton
• " Wanted a solution to m(a*x) =x^b * m(x) , m unknown ", alain verghote
• equality of finite spaces, Sikari
  • Re: equality of finite spaces, Arturo Magidin
    • Re: equality of finite spaces, Bill Dubuque
  • Re: equality of finite spaces, The World Wide Wade
    • Re: equality of finite spaces, Gerry Myerson
  • Re: equality of finite spaces, Keith A. Lewis
  • Re: equality of finite spaces, Sikari
• Konig's Lemma: weak vs. "restricted to two immediate successors", sappidus
  • Re: Konig's Lemma: weak vs. "restricted to two immediate successors", Larry Hammick
    • Re: Konig's Lemma: weak vs. "restricted to two immediate successors", Larry Hammick
    • Re: Konig's Lemma: weak vs. "restricted to two immediate successors", sappidus
      • Re: Konig's Lemma: weak vs. "restricted to two immediate successors", Bill Taylor
      • Re: Konig's Lemma: weak vs. "restricted to two immediate successors", sappidus
      • Re: Konig's Lemma: weak vs. "restricted to two immediate successors", Keith Ramsay
• Splitting and joining n-tuples, Michael Stemper
  • Re: Splitting and joining n-tuples, Matt Gutting
• Hamiltonian vector fields, Nicola Sottocornola
  • Re: Hamiltonian vector fields, C. Lee
• Arity of operations, fukkicini
  • Re: Arity of operations, Arturo Magidin
• Derivative not integrable, José Carlos Santos
  • Re: Derivative not integrable, Angus Rodgers
    • Re: Derivative not integrable, José Carlos Santos
      • Re: Derivative not integrable, Angus Rodgers
      • Re: Derivative not integrable, The World Wide Wade
      • Re: Derivative not integrable, David C . Ullrich
      • Fatou much like hard work (was: Derivative not integrable), Angus Rodgers
      • Re: Fatou much like hard work (was: Derivative not integrable), David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Fatou much like hard work (was: Derivative not integrable), Angus Rodgers
      • Re: Fatou much like hard work (was: Derivative not integrable), David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Fatou much like hard work (was: Derivative not integrable), Angus Rodgers
      • Re: Fatou much like hard work (was: Derivative not integrable), ArtflDodgr
      • Re: Fatou much like hard work (was: Derivative not integrable), G. A. Edgar
      • Re: Fatou much like hard work (was: Derivative not integrable), Angus Rodgers
      • Re: Fatou much like hard work (was: Derivative not integrable), G. A. Edgar
      • Re: Fatou much like hard work (was: Derivative not integrable), Angus Rodgers
      • Re: Fatou much like hard work (was: Derivative not integrable), Angus Rodgers
      • Re: Fatou much like hard work (was: Derivative not integrable), David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Fatou much like hard work (was: Derivative not integrable), G. A. Edgar
    • Re: Derivative not integrable, Gerry Myerson
      • Re: Derivative not integrable, Angus Rodgers
  • Re: Derivative not integrable, David C . Ullrich
    • Re: Derivative not integrable, José Carlos Santos
  • Re: Derivative not integrable, Zbigniew Fiedorowicz
    • Re: Derivative not integrable, José Carlos Santos
• Re: Proving that inv(G) is a group, grimster
  • Re: Proving that inv(G) is a group, A N Niel
    • Re: Proving that inv(G) is a group, grimster
      • Re: Proving that inv(G) is a group, Alois Steindl
      • Re: Proving that inv(G) is a group, grimster
      • Re: Proving that inv(G) is a group, Marc Olschok
      • Re: Proving that inv(G) is a group, grimster
      • Re: Proving that inv(G) is a group, Marc Olschok
      • Re: Proving that inv(G) is a group, Arturo Magidin
• elementary number theory, Someonekicked
• Generalized Fourier Transform, Gabriel Cardi
  • Re: Generalized Fourier Transform, Randy Yates
• algebra, nonton
  • Re: algebra, José Carlos Santos
  • Re: algebra, Arturo Magidin
    • Re: algebra, Justin Young
      • Re: algebra, Arturo Magidin
    • Re: algebra, nonton
      • Re: algebra, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: algebra, nonton
      • Re: algebra, Arturo Magidin
• Re: School Textbooks and Japanese WWII Amnesia, A N Niel
• derivative of an integral, tamiry
  • Re: derivative of an integral, A N Niel
  • Re: derivative of an integral, bryant_j_j
  • Re: derivative of an integral, Ulysse Keller
  • Re: derivative of an integral, Shane
• Stupid newbie DE problem, Mein Zy
  • Re: Stupid newbie DE problem, Martin Shobe
  • Re: Stupid newbie DE problem, Ari
• Q: notation of the form y(t; e) = ..., nocturne
• Injective objects in an arrow category of modules over a ring, Nobuo Saito
  • Re: Injective objects in an arrow category of modules over a ring, Robin Chapman
    • Re: Injective objects in an arrow category of modules over a ring, Nobuo Saito
      • Re: Injective objects in an arrow category of modules over a ring, Robin Chapman
      • Re: Injective objects in an arrow category of modules over a ring, Nobuo Saito
      • Re: Injective objects in an arrow category of modules over a ring, Marc Olschok
      • Re: Injective objects in an arrow category of modules over a ring, Zbigniew Fiedorowicz
      • Re: Injective objects in an arrow category of modules over a ring, Marc Olschok
• Stupid newbie separable DE problem, Mein Zy
• Re: JSH: Math people are dumb, Jesse F. Hughes
• Math Challenge, analysisman
  • Re: Math Challenge, Stephen White
  • Re: Math Challenge, William Elliot
    • Re: Math Challenge, analysisman
      • Re: Math Challenge, William Elliot
  • Re: Math Challenge, analysisman
  • Re: Math Challenge, Sukjah Roh
    • Re: Math Challenge, Zbigniew Fiedorowicz
      • Re: Math Challenge, analysisman
      • Re: Math Challenge, Zbigniew Fiedorowicz
      • Re: Math Challenge, Sukjah Roh
• Stats Question, Saint Cad
  • Re: Stats Question, Mark Atherton
    • Re: Stats Question, Saint Cad
• 2D graph problem, vsgdp
  • Re: 2D graph problem, Virgil
    • Re: 2D graph problem, vsgdp
• Re: Pi,log e,large and small integer relations!, Dan
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Pi,log e,large and small integer relations!, alexandru . lupas
• Analysis Problems, mathanalysis
  • Re: Analysis Problems, Chip Eastham
  • Re: Analysis Problems, Robert Israel
  • Re: Analysis Problems, mathanalysis
    • Re: Analysis Problems, alexandru . lupas
    • Re: Analysis Problems, David C . Ullrich
  • Re: Analysis Problems, mathanalysis
• Re: Math people are dumb, Larry Hammick
• Re: Ribenboim and then Rose fail to deliver a valid proof of Euclid's Infin, bertran
• coding theory books, jeffconner50
  • Re: coding theory books, Joseph Fagan
  • Re: coding theory books, Dirk Van de moortel
  • Re: coding theory books, patrick
• Parameterization of singular n-by-n matrices of rank r<n, K. Y.
  • Re: Parameterization of singular n-by-n matrices of rank r<n, Robert Israel
    • Re: Parameterization of singular n-by-n matrices of rank r<n, K. Y.
      • Re: Parameterization of singular n-by-n matrices of rank r<n, Robert Israel
      • Re: Parameterization of singular n-by-n matrices of rank r<n, K. Y.
      • Re: Parameterization of singular n-by-n matrices of rank r<n, Robert Israel
• lottery system and math, lottoking
  • Re: lottery system and math, Will Twentyman
    • Re: lottery system and math, lottoking
  • Re: lottery system and math, Bart Goddard
    • Re: lottery system and math, lottoking
      • Re: lottery system and math, lottoking
• Universal delta functors, Sirix
  • Re: Universal delta functors, Jannick Asmus
• summation help, jimbo
  • Re: summation help, José Carlos Santos
  • Re: summation help, William Elliot
    • Re: summation help, jimbo
• recurrence/proof help please, jimbo
  • Re: recurrence/proof help please, José Carlos Santos
    • Re: recurrence/proof help please, alexandru . lupas
      • Re: recurrence/proof help please, jimbo
  • Re: recurrence/proof help please, Karl-Olav Nyberg
    • Re: recurrence/proof help please, Karl-Olav Nyberg
• Input spectral density matrix, Tim Waanders
• Lorentz Transformation, Aleksandar Vukelja
• Mathematical Invalidity of the Lorentz Transformation ..., Aleksandar Vukelja
• simplify the inifnite series, ZHANG Yan
  • Re: simplify the inifnite series, Robin Chapman
• Sobolev question, bobm2005
  • Re: Sobolev question, David C . Ullrich
    • Re: Sobolev question, bobm2005
      • Message not available
      • Re: Sobolev question, bobm2005
      • Re: Sobolev question, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Sobolev question, bobm2005
      • Re: Sobolev question, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Sobolev question, bobm2005
• New mathematics/physical sciences positions at http://jobs.phds.org, April 11, 2005, PhDs . org Webmaster
• Help Needed, hhsaffar
  • Re: Help Needed, William Elliot
    • Re: Help Needed, Oscar Lanzi III
      • Re: Help Needed, William Elliot
• two dimensional gaussian function, raghu
  • Re: two dimensional gaussian function, A N Niel
• problem with formula, Wim
  • Re: problem with formula, José Carlos Santos
    • Re: problem with formula, Wim
• Stuck on a noetherian UFD problem, warren065
  • Re: Stuck on a noetherian UFD problem, Ted Hwa
    • Re: Stuck on a noetherian UFD problem, Bill Dubuque
  • Re: Stuck on a noetherian UFD problem, mzafrullah
    • Re: Stuck on a noetherian UFD problem, mzafrullah
  • Re: Stuck on a noetherian UFD problem, warren065
    • Re: Stuck on a noetherian UFD problem, mzafrullah
• Heuristics for number theory?, Stephen White
  • Re: Heuristics for number theory?, Larry Hammick
    • Re: Heuristics for number theory?, Stephen White
      • Re: Heuristics for number theory?, patrick
      • Re: Heuristics for number theory?, James Dolan
  • Re: Heuristics for number theory?, James Dolan
    • Re: Heuristics for number theory?, Larry Hammick
      • Theta functions (was Re: Heuristics for number theory?), Christopher J. Henrich
      • Re: Theta functions (was Re: Heuristics for number theory?), Larry Hammick
    • Re: Heuristics for number theory?, Angus Rodgers
• Projective geometry query., Bill Taylor
  • Re: Projective geometry query., Ken Pledger
    • Re: Projective geometry query., Dave Rusin
• Probability and numbers, undbund
  • Re: Probability and numbers, Matt Gutting
  • Re: Probability and numbers, William Elliot
  • Re: Probability and numbers, lucky.ran
    • Re: Probability and numbers, William Elliot
    • Re: Probability and numbers, The Qurqirish Dragon
• Differential Geometry, mark12345
  • Re: Differential Geometry, Zdislav V. Kovarik
• Current Status of Topology, Tunesmith
  • Re: Current Status of Topology, William Elliot
  • Re: Current Status of Topology, William Elliot
  • Re: Current Status of Topology, Chan-Ho Suh
    • Re: Current Status of Topology, Robert Kolker
      • Re: Current Status of Topology, Chan-Ho Suh
      • Re: Current Status of Topology, Lee Rudolph
• request:logic .would You help??, KAroline
  • Re: request:logic .would You help??, KAroline
    • Re: request:logic .would You help??, jcastro
• is this proof valid, vsgdp
  • Re: is this proof valid, Angus Rodgers
    • Re: is this proof valid, Angus Rodgers
  • Re: is this proof valid, William Elliot
• Probability and Semantics for Modal Logic, Andrew J Bacon
  • Re: Probability and Semantics for Modal Logic, David C . Ullrich
    • Re: Probability and Semantics for Modal Logic, Andrew J Bacon
      • Re: Probability and Semantics for Modal Logic, David C . Ullrich
    • Re: Probability and Semantics for Modal Logic, Jesse F. Hughes
• sum functions distinct range, jqstmartin@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: sum functions distinct range, Robert Israel
• MATLAB Sphere, reydioactive
  • Re: MATLAB Sphere, José Carlos Santos
    • Re: MATLAB Sphere, Randy Poe
      • Re: MATLAB Sphere, José Carlos Santos
• Integral convergence., Anolethron
  • Re: Integral convergence., The World Wide Wade
• JSH: What's happening now?, jstevh
  • Re: JSH: What's happening now?, David Kastrup
  • Re: JSH: What's happening now?, Narcoleptic Insomniac
  • Re: JSH: What's happening now?, Larry Lard
    • Re: JSH: What's happening now?, denis feldmann
  • Re: JSH: What's happening now?, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: JSH: What's happening now?, José Carlos Santos
  • Re: JSH: What's happening now?, Jesse F. Hughes
    • Re: JSH: What's happening now?, Proginoskes
      • Re: JSH: What's happening now?, jstevh
      • Re: JSH: What's happening now?, Proginoskes
  • Re: JSH: What's happening now?, Felix Rawlings
    • Re: JSH: What's happening now?, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: JSH: What's happening now?, David Kastrup
      • Re: JSH: What's happening now?, ošin
      • Re: JSH: What's happening now?, Proginoskes
      • Re: JSH: What's happening now?, Matt Gutting
      • Re: JSH: What's happening now?, Felix Rawlings
      • Re: JSH: What's happening now?, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: JSH: What's happening now?, Matt Gutting
      • Re: JSH: What's happening now?, Giuseppe Bilotta
      • Re: JSH: What's happening now?, Gib Bogle
      • Re: JSH: What's happening now?, David C . Ullrich
  • Re: What's happening now?, Tim Peters
  • Re: JSH: What's happening now?, David C . Ullrich
  • Re: JSH: What's happening now?, Narcoleptic Insomniac
  • Re: JSH: What's happening now?, Proginoskes
    • Re: JSH: What's happening now?, Tim Peters
    • Re: JSH: What's happening now?, jstevh
      • Re: JSH: What's happening now?, C. Bond
      • Re: JSH: What's happening now?, José Carlos Santos
      • Re: JSH: What's happening now?, jstevh
      • Re: JSH: What's happening now?, litsohate
      • Re: JSH: What's happening now?, jstevh
      • Re: JSH: What's happening now?, Randy Poe
      • Re: JSH: What's happening now?, Proginoskes
      • Re: JSH: What's happening now?, Dik T. Winter
• Approved mortage rate, "Ingrid Huddleston"
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Approved mortage rate, "Michel Rosen"
  • Approved mortage rate, "Stewart Winston"
  • Approved mortage rate, "Justine Corbin"
• Noetherian simple ring question..., Tony
• Re: Enriched category theory question, Gonēalo Rodrigues
  • Re: Enriched category theory question, James Dolan
    • Re: Enriched category theory question, Gonēalo Rodrigues
• Re: pathological ring, Hagen
• ideal rankings for math related Google queries, Amir Michail
• nonlinear characteristic partial differential equations, frederick_s_johnson
  • Re: nonlinear characteristic partial differential equations, Robert Israel
• Maximizing the trace, garrettbaird2
  • Re: Maximizing the trace, garrettbaird2
  • Re: Maximizing the trace, Igor Khavkine
    • Re: Maximizing the trace, garrettbaird2
    • Re: Maximizing the trace, Thomas Mautsch
  • Re: Maximizing the trace, Lee Rudolph
• Topology!, Marek
  • Re: Topology!, Marek
    • Re: Topology!, W. Dale Hall
      • Re: Topology!, Zbigniew Fiedorowicz
      • Re: Topology!, W. Dale Hall
      • Re: Topology!, Zbigniew Fiedorowicz
      • Re: Topology!, W. Dale Hall
      • Re: Topology!, W. Dale Hall
• Re: Courage?, Lawrence House
  • Re: Courage?, Ross A. Finlayson
    • Re: Courage?, Lawrence House
    • Re: Courage?, Eckard Blumschein
      • Re: Courage?, Matt Gutting
      • Re: Courage?, Eckard Blumschein
      • Re: Courage?, Matt Gutting
      • Re: Courage?, Eckard Blumschein
      • Re: Courage?, Matt Gutting
      • Re: Courage?, Eckard Blumschein
      • Re: Courage?, worldsofsolution
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Courage?, Alois Steindl
  • Re: Courage?, Eckard Blumschein
    • Re: Courage?, Matt Gutting
      • Re: Courage?, Eckard Blumschein
    • Re: Courage?, Randy Poe
      • Re: Courage?, Eckard Blumschein
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Courage?, Eckard Blumschein
  • Re: Courage?, Michael Stemper
    • Re: Courage?, Will Twentyman
  • Re: Courage?, Alois Steindl
    • Re: Courage?, Eckard Blumschein
  • Re: Courage?, Franziska Neugebauer
    • Re: Courage?, Eckard Blumschein
      • Re: Courage?, Matt Gutting
  • Re: Courage?, Franziska Neugebauer
  • Re: Courage?, Jesse F. Hughes
  • Re: Courage?, Franziska Neugebauer
  • Re: Courage?, Robin Chapman
  • Re: Courage?, Robin Chapman
  • Re: Courage?, Robin Chapman
  • Re: Courage?, Robert Kolker
    • Re: Courage?, Franziska Neugebauer
  • Re: Courage?, Franziska Neugebauer
  • Re: Courage?, Ed van der Meulen
  • Re: Courage?, Lester Zick
  • Re: Courage?, Virgil
• Generalized Stokes Theorem, tetrahedron
  • Re: Generalized Stokes Theorem, Keith Ramsay
    • Re: Generalized Stokes Theorem, James Dolan
    • Re: Generalized Stokes Theorem, tetrahedron
      • Re: Generalized Stokes Theorem, Keith Ramsay
  • Re: Generalized Stokes Theorem, JEMebius
  • Re: Generalized Stokes Th... correction, JEMebius
• What (if anything) is a "near ring" ?, David Ames
  • Re: What (if anything) is a "near ring" ?, A N Niel
  • Re: What (if anything) is a "near ring" ?, José Carlos Santos
  • Re: What (if anything) is a "near ring" ?, Zbigniew Fiedorowicz
• Please Help: an algebraic problem, Chris Quickfall
  • Message not available
    • Re: Please Help: an algebraic problem, chrisquickfall
      • Re: Please Help: an algebraic problem, William Elliot
      • Re: Please Help: an algebraic problem, The Qurqirish Dragon
  • Re: Please Help: an algebraic problem, William Elliot
    • Re: Please Help: an algebraic problem, Chris Quickfall
      • Re: Please Help: an algebraic problem, William Elliot
      • Re: Please Help: an algebraic problem, Chris Quickfall
      • Re: Please Help: an algebraic problem, William Elliot
• proving isomorphism(same question!), tom
  • Re: proving isomorphism(same question!), Larry Hammick
• Convergence in L^1, question..., Tony
  • Re: Convergence in L^1, question..., A N Niel
    • Re: Convergence in L^1, question..., José Carlos Santos
      • Re: Convergence in L^1, question..., The World Wide Wade
      • Re: Convergence in L^1, question..., José Carlos Santos
  • Re: Convergence in L^1, question..., The World Wide Wade
• standard deviation for lottery sum, Stig Holmquist
• Re: Representing Infinite/transfinite numbers by unitary numerals., zuhair
• triangle derived from Pascal's triangle, hyper tetraeders form hyper cubes, Christian Schuhegger
  • Re: triangle derived from Pascal's triangle, hyper tetraeders form hyper cubes, Boi
  • Re: triangle derived from Pascal's triangle, hyper tetraeders form hyper cubes, Boi
  • Re: triangle derived from Pascal's triangle, hyper tetraeders form hyper cubes, A N Niel
  • Re: triangle derived from Pascal's triangle, hyper tetraeders form hyper cubes, Robin Chapman
• Skew symmetric matrix exponential, johngcarlsson
  • Re: Skew symmetric matrix exponential, bryant_j_j
• Re: Please ID book on Radon Transform, James Dolan
  • Re: Please ID book on Radon Transform, Dan Piponi
    • Re: Please ID book on Radon Transform, Alex.Lupas
      • Re: Please ID book on Radon Transform, Dan Piponi
• ODE Question, Joe Harris
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • ODE Question, Joe Harris
• Order Complete, DD
  • Re: Order Complete, Virgil
    • Re: Order Complete, DD
      • Re: Order Complete, fishfry
      • Re: Order Complete, DD
      • Re: Order Complete, Zdislav V. Kovarik
• Looking for beta testers for a cell-phone scientific calculator, Bacademy
• asymptotic behaviour of a fourier integral with branch point, Giuseppe
• a prime sequence, Jon Slaughter
  • Re: a prime sequence, Christian Bau
• Calculating correlation coefficient, Darius Blaszijk
• Re: Google vs. The Rest Of The Mathematical World, Phil Freedenberg
  • Re: Google vs. The Rest Of The Mathematical World, A N Niel
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Google vs. The Rest Of The Mathematical World, Zer0
• algebra problem involving matrices, Robert
  • Re: algebra problem involving matrices, Jim Spriggs
    • Re: algebra problem involving matrices, Narcoleptic Insomniac
• The jstevh@msn.com Support Group, Jonny
  • Re: The jstevh@msn.com Support Group, Jesse F. Hughes
    • Re: The jstevh@msn.com Support Group, ošin
      • Re: The jstevh@msn.com Support Group, Gib Bogle
      • Re: The jstevh@msn.com Support Group, Proginoskes
      • Re: The jstevh@msn.com Support Group, Rick Decker
      • Re: The jstevh@msn.com Support Group, Proginoskes
      • Re: The jstevh@msn.com Support Group, Rick Decker
      • Re: The jstevh@msn.com Support Group, Proginoskes
      • Re: The jstevh@msn.com Support Group, Gib Bogle
      • Re: The jstevh@msn.com Support Group, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: The jstevh@msn.com Support Group, Richard Henry
      • Re: The jstevh@msn.com Support Group, Lash Rambo
  • Re: The jstevh@msn.com Support Group, C. Bond
    • Re: The jstevh@msn.com Support Group, bosvo Shulmy
  • Re: The jstevh@msn.com Support Group, Justin
    • Re: The jstevh@msn.com Support Group, Rick Decker
      • Re: The jstevh@msn.com Support Group, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: The jstevh@msn.com Support Group, porky_pig_jr@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: The jstevh@msn.com Support Group, John Smith
      • Re: The jstevh@msn.com Support Group, Lash Rambo
• Re: Partitions of Reals, Robert Sheskey
  • Re: Partitions of Reals, G. A. Edgar
    • Re: Partitions of Reals, Robert Sheskey
• a calculus problem, SU(2)
  • Re: a calculus problem, Rick Decker
  • Re: a calculus problem, Lynn Kurtz
    • Re: a calculus problem, The World Wide Wade
  • Re: a calculus problem, wheierman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: a calculus problem, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: a calculus problem, The World Wide Wade
• As Stakes Increase, Prime-Number Theory Moves Closer to Proof, MrPepper11
  • Re: As Stakes Increase, Prime-Number Theory Moves Closer to Proof, David Kastrup
    • Re: As Stakes Increase, Prime-Number Theory Moves Closer to Proof, Randy Poe
    • Re: As Stakes Increase, Prime-Number Theory Moves Closer to Proof, John Smith
      • Re: As Stakes Increase, Prime-Number Theory Moves Closer to Proof, Randy Poe
      • Re: As Stakes Increase, Prime-Number Theory Moves Closer to Proof, John Smith
      • Re: As Stakes Increase, Prime-Number Theory Moves Closer to Proof, Matt Gutting
      • Re: As Stakes Increase, Prime-Number Theory Moves Closer to Proof, Randy Poe
      • Re: As Stakes Increase, Prime-Number Theory Moves Closer to Proof, guenther.vonKnakspott@xxxxxx
      • Re: As Stakes Increase, Prime-Number Theory Moves Closer to Proof, Gerry Myerson
      • Re: As Stakes Increase, Prime-Number Theory Moves Closer to Proof, guenther.vonKnakspott@xxxxxx
      • Re: As Stakes Increase, Prime-Number Theory Moves Closer to Proof, John Smith
      • Re: As Stakes Increase, Prime-Number Theory Moves Closer to Proof, guenther.vonKnakspott@xxxxxx
  • Re: As Stakes Increase, Prime-Number Theory Moves Closer to Proof, fishfry
    • Re: As Stakes Increase, Prime-Number Theory Moves Closer to Proof, Matt Gutting
      • Re: As Stakes Increase, Prime-Number Theory Moves Closer to Proof, Jesse F. Hughes
    • Re: As Stakes Increase, Prime-Number Theory Moves Closer to Proof, Pubkeybreaker
      • Re: As Stakes Increase, Prime-Number Theory Moves Closer to Proof, Gerry Myerson
  • Re: As Stakes Increase, Prime-Number Theory Moves Closer to Proof, luiroto
  • Re: As Stakes Increase, Prime-Number Theory Moves Closer to Proof, Tony
• n-parameter calculations in 2D, SunCode
• max-min problem, Martin
  • Re: max-min problem, Herman Rubin
    • Re: max-min problem, Martin
      • Re: max-min problem, MathMarc
      • Re: max-min problem, Martin
• Can anyone help?, Chiel
• Re: Gist of surrogate factoring theorem, Larry Hammick
• dividing units, settle an argument, jason . a . flint
  • Re: dividing units, settle an argument, William Elliot
  • Re: dividing units, settle an argument, Richard Tobin
  • Re: dividing units, settle an argument, Randy Poe
    • Re: dividing units, settle an argument, jason . a . flint
      • Re: dividing units, settle an argument, Randy Poe
      • Re: dividing units, settle an argument, jason . a . flint
      • Re: dividing units, settle an argument, William Elliot
      • Re: dividing units, settle an argument, Dave Seaman
• Re: Inspiring Mathematics Resources, Z
• Searching for Earth Distance Source Code, Norm Dresner
  • Re: Searching for Earth Distance Source Code, Sylvain Croussette
    • Re: Searching for Earth Distance Source Code, Norm Dresner
• anti Collision algorithm, bulldog8
• The Three Most Absurd Numbers On Earth, Zer0
  • Re: The Three Most Absurd Numbers On Earth, William Elliot
    • Re: The Three Most Absurd Numbers On Earth, Proginoskes
      • Re: The Three Most Absurd Numbers On Earth, Zer0
      • Re: The Three Most Absurd Numbers On Earth, Rick Decker
      • Re: The Three Most Absurd Numbers On Earth, William Elliot
      • Re: The Three Most Absurd Numbers On Earth, Joseph Hertzlinger
  • Re: The Three Most Absurd Numbers On Earth, porky_pig_jr@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: The Three Most Absurd Numbers On Earth, Robert Kolker
  • Re: The Three Most Absurd Numbers On Earth, Dan Piponi
    • Re: The Three Most Absurd Numbers On Earth, Hero
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: The Three Most Absurd Numbers On Earth, porky_pig_jr@xxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: The Three Most Absurd Numbers On Earth, William Elliot
  • Re: The Three Most Absurd Numbers On Earth, Zer0
• Fast minimizer, Herbert Seidenberg
  • Re: Fast minimizer, Michael Jųrgensen
  • Re: Fast minimizer, Ray Koopman
    • Re: Fast minimizer, Herbert Seidenberg
      • Re: Fast minimizer, Ray Koopman
      • Re: Fast minimizer, Ray Koopman
      • Re: Fast minimizer, Herbert Seidenberg
      • Re: Fast minimizer, r.e.s.
      • Re: Fast minimizer, Herbert Seidenberg
      • Re: Fast minimizer, r.e.s.
      • Re: Fast minimizer, Herbert Seidenberg
      • Re: Fast minimizer, Greg Egan
      • Re: Fast minimizer, Ray Koopman
• Monic orthogonal polynomials, Richard Hayden
  • Re: Monic orthogonal polynomials, alexandru . lupas
    • Re: Monic orthogonal polynomials, Richard Hayden
      • Re: Monic orthogonal polynomials, Alex.Lupas
    • Re: Monic orthogonal polynomials, Alex.Lupas
• Re: Ó¿Ò, THE GREATEST NEWS EVER ! °º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø°º¤ø,¸¸, Zer0
• JSH: Social forces, that strong?, jstevh
  • Re: Social forces, that strong?, flip
  • Re: Social forces, that strong?, Jonny
    • Re: Social forces, that strong?, jstevh
      • Re: Social forces, that strong?, Proginoskes
      • Re: Social forces, that strong?, jstevh
      • Re: Social forces, that strong?, Proginoskes
• Mathforge.net :: The Abel Prize, Math in Prison, Complex Analysis, and April Fool's Pranks, jkauzlar
  • Re: Mathforge.net :: The Abel Prize, Math in Prison, Complex Analysis, and April Fool's Pranks, Christian Bau
• Limit involving consecutive primes, rich burge
  • Re: Limit involving consecutive primes, Christian Bau
    • Re: Limit involving consecutive primes, rich burge
    • Re: Limit involving consecutive primes, rich burge
    • Re: Limit involving consecutive primes, Paul Pollack
• Algebraic topology, nonton
  • Re: Algebraic topology, Larry Hammick
  • Re: Algebraic topology, David C . Ullrich
• Too old for math?, Kira Yamato
  • Re: Too old for math?, Arturo Magidin
• Re: Limits algebraic problem, mathman
• Power Sets, xhantt
  • Re: Power Sets, Herman Rubin
    • Re: Power Sets, Lawrence House
    • Re: Power Sets, William Elliot
      • Re: Power Sets, Butch Malahide
    • Re: Power Sets, xhantt
      • Re: Power Sets, William Elliot
    • Re: Power Sets, xhantt
• maximum number of code words, jeffconner50
  • Re: maximum number of code words, Proginoskes
    • Re: maximum number of code words, jeffconner50
  • Re: maximum number of code words, Jyrki Lahtonen
    • Re: maximum number of code words, jeffconner50
      • Re: maximum number of code words, Ioannis
      • Re: maximum number of code words, Jyrki Lahtonen
      • Re: maximum number of code words, jeffconner50
      • Re: maximum number of code words, Jyrki Lahtonen
• Mathematical Invalidity of the Lorentz Transformation (2. post), Aleksandar Vukelja
  • Re: Mathematical Invalidity of the Lorentz Transformation (2. post), Dirk Van de moortel
    • Re: Mathematical Invalidity of the Lorentz Transformation (2. post), brightice2001
      • Re: Mathematical Invalidity of the Lorentz Transformation (2. post), Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Mathematical Invalidity of the Lorentz Transformation (2. post), Too Many Kooks Spoil the Brothel
  • Re: Mathematical Invalidity of the Lorentz Transformation (2. post), brightice2001
• new question(proving isomorphism yet again), tom
  • Re: new question(proving isomorphism yet again), Tonico
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: new question(proving isomorphism yet again), tom
• Re: Topicality: James Harris and surrogate factoring (vote), Jesse F. Hughes
  • Re: Topicality: James Harris and surrogate factoring (vote), David C . Ullrich
    • Re: Topicality: James Harris and surrogate factoring (vote), David Kastrup
    • Re: Topicality: James Harris and surrogate factoring (vote), Angus Rodgers
    • Re: Topicality: James Harris and surrogate factoring (vote), Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Topicality: James Harris and surrogate factoring (vote), Michael Lockhart
      • Re: Topicality: James Harris and surrogate factoring (vote), Jesse F. Hughes
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Topicality: James Harris and surrogate factoring (vote), Rick Decker
    • Re: Topicality: James Harris and surrogate factoring (vote), David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Topicality: James Harris and surrogate factoring (vote), Rick Decker
      • Re: Topicality: James Harris and surrogate factoring (vote), David Kastrup
      • Re: Topicality: James Harris and surrogate factoring (vote), Wayne Brown
      • Re: Topicality: James Harris and surrogate factoring (vote), mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Topicality: James Harris and surrogate factoring (vote), Wayne Brown
      • Re: Topicality: James Harris and surrogate factoring (vote), David Kastrup
      • Re: Topicality: James Harris and surrogate factoring (vote), Wayne Brown
  • Re: Topicality: James Harris and surrogate factoring (vote), Jesse F. Hughes
  • Re: Topicality: James Harris and surrogate factoring (vote), Jesse F. Hughes
    • Re: Topicality: James Harris and surrogate factoring (vote), David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Topicality: James Harris and surrogate factoring (vote), Gib Bogle
      • Re: Topicality: James Harris and surrogate factoring (vote), mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Topicality: James Harris and surrogate factoring (vote), Wayne Brown
  • Re: Topicality: James Harris and surrogate factoring (vote), Jesse F. Hughes
• Re: basic maths explenation regarding error-correcting question please, ben
• Re: proving isomorphisms, tom
  • Re: proving isomorphisms, Tonico
    • Re: proving isomorphisms, tom
• Mistake in previous post regarding convergence, Robert
  • Re: Mistake in previous post regarding convergence, Stephen J. Herschkorn
  • Re: Mistake in previous post regarding convergence, Arturo Magidin
• Re-finance at todays low rate, "Napoleon Street"
• Nonlinear optimization problem, bcl400
  • Re: Nonlinear optimization problem, Chip Eastham
    • Re: Nonlinear optimization problem, bcl400
      • Re: Nonlinear optimization problem, Chip Eastham
• Series covergence/divergence, Robert
  • Re: Series covergence/divergence, harold Schmelzr
    • Re: Series covergence/divergence, Zdislav V. Kovarik
  • Re: Series covergence/divergence, Arturo Magidin
  • Re: Series covergence/divergence, Zdislav V. Kovarik
• Re: TELESCOPING SERIES AND RATIONAL FUNCTIONS, wheierman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: TELESCOPING SERIES AND RATIONAL FUNCTIONS, Dave Rusin
    • Re: TELESCOPING SERIES AND RATIONAL FUNCTIONS, Robert Israel
  • Re: TELESCOPING SERIES AND RATIONAL FUNCTIONS, Marko Riedel
  • Re: TELESCOPING SERIES AND RATIONAL FUNCTIONS, M.J.T. Guy
    • Re: TELESCOPING SERIES AND RATIONAL FUNCTIONS, wheierman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
      • Remaining Question is Answered, wheierman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• role of fundamental group, Carl R.
  • Re: role of fundamental group, José Carlos Santos
  • Re: role of fundamental group, LD
  • Re: role of fundamental group, W. Dale Hall
  • Re: role of fundamental group, Dave Rusin
    • Re: role of fundamental group, Lee Rudolph
    • Re: role of fundamental group, James Dolan
• riemannian isometry : last example, Saem T.
  • Re: riemannian isometry : last example, W. Dale Hall
• lambda substitution, Alex6996xelA
  • Re: lambda substitution, Ian A. Mason
    • Re: lambda substitution, Boi
      • Re: lambda substitution, Ian A. Mason
  • Re: lambda substitution, William Elliot
    • Re: lambda substitution, Ian A. Mason
      • Re: lambda substitution, Ian A. Mason
      • Re: lambda substitution, William Elliot
      • Re: lambda substitution, tez_h
      • Re: lambda substitution, William Elliot
• Help with integral - like Bessel function, sp_mclaugh
  • Re: Help with integral - like Bessel function, Boi
    • Re: Help with integral - like Bessel function, sp_mclaugh
      • Re: Help with integral - like Bessel function, Boi
      • Re: Help with integral - like Bessel function, Boi
      • Re: Help with integral - like Bessel function, sp_mclaugh
• linear algebra - basic determinant properties, how intuitive are they?, porky_pig_jr@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: linear algebra - basic determinant properties, how intuitive are they?, Proginoskes
    • Re: linear algebra - basic determinant properties, how intuitive are they?, porky_pig_jr@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: linear algebra - basic determinant properties, how intuitive are they?, porky_pig_jr@xxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: linear algebra - basic determinant properties, how intuitive are they?, Ray Koopman
      • Re: linear algebra - basic determinant properties, how intuitive are they?, Dave Rusin
    • Re: linear algebra - basic determinant properties, how intuitive are they?, Gottfried Helms
  • Re: linear algebra - basic determinant properties, how intuitive are they?, Narcoleptic Insomniac
    • Re: linear algebra - basic determinant properties, how intuitive are they?, Gerry Myerson
      • Re: linear algebra - basic determinant properties, how intuitive are they?, Proginoskes
  • Re: linear algebra - basic determinant properties, how intuitive are they?, LD
  • Re: linear algebra - basic determinant properties, how intuitive are they?, Larry Hammick
  • Re: linear algebra - basic determinant properties, how intuitive are they?, Ken Pledger
• who is the most brilliant mathematician ever lived?, nelsondastoner@xxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: who is the most brilliant mathematician ever lived?, Lynn Kurtz
    • Re: who is the most brilliant mathematician ever lived?, Larry Hammick
  • Re: who is the most brilliant mathematician ever lived?, bryant_j_j
    • Re: who is the most brilliant mathematician ever lived?, Wannabee
      • Re: who is the most brilliant mathematician ever lived?, bryant_j_j
    • Re: who is the most brilliant mathematician ever lived?, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
  • Re: who is the most brilliant mathematician ever lived?, LD
  • Re: who is the most brilliant mathematician ever lived?, Robert Kolker
    • Re: who is the most brilliant mathematician ever lived?, Jim Spriggs
      • Re: who is the most brilliant mathematician ever lived?, Jesse F. Hughes
  • Re: who is the most brilliant mathematician ever lived?, Eckard Blumschein
    • Re: who is the most brilliant mathematician ever lived?, Torkel Franzen
      • Re: who is the most brilliant mathematician ever lived?, Eckard Blumschein
    • Re: who is the most brilliant mathematician ever lived?, guenther.vonKnakspott@xxxxxx
      • Re: who is the most brilliant mathematician ever lived?, Eckard Blumschein
      • Re: who is the most brilliant mathematician ever lived?, guenther.vonKnakspott@xxxxxx
      • Re: who is the most brilliant mathematician ever lived?, Eckard Blumschein
  • Re: who is the most brilliant mathematician ever lived?, Gonēalo Rodrigues
  • Re: who is the most brilliant mathematician ever lived?, Pubkeybreaker
    • Re: who is the most brilliant mathematician ever lived?, Torkel Franzen
    • Re: who is the most brilliant mathematician ever lived?, LD
      • Re: who is the most brilliant mathematician ever lived?, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: who is the most brilliant mathematician ever lived?, LD
    • Re: who is the most brilliant mathematician ever lived?, Eckard Blumschein
      • Re: who is the most brilliant mathematician ever lived?, guenther.vonKnakspott@xxxxxx
      • Re: who is the most brilliant mathematician ever lived?, Eckard Blumschein
      • Re: who is the most brilliant mathematician ever lived?, guenther.vonKnakspott@xxxxxx
      • Re: who is the most brilliant mathematician ever lived?, Eckard Blumschein
  • Re: who is the most brilliant mathematician ever lived?, Lawrence House
    • Re: who is the most brilliant mathematician ever lived?, Ioannis
  • Re: who is the most brilliant mathematician ever lived?, Abraham Buckingham
  • Re: who is the most brilliant mathematician ever lived?, Lawrence House
    • Re: who is the most brilliant mathematician ever lived?, Robert Kolker
    • Re: who is the most brilliant mathematician ever lived?, Pubkeybreaker
    • Re: who is the most brilliant mathematician ever lived?, Bart Goddard
      • Re: who is the most brilliant mathematician ever lived?, Gerry Myerson
      • Re: who is the most brilliant mathematician ever lived?, steve_wildstrom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: who is the most brilliant mathematician ever lived?, Bart Goddard
      • Re: who is the most brilliant mathematician ever lived?, Robert Israel
• geometric problem, claney
• unequal to 29, James Buddenhagen
  • Re: unequal to 29, Gerry Myerson
    • Re: unequal to 29, Proginoskes
      • Re: unequal to 29, Gerry Myerson
      • Re: unequal to 29, James Buddenhagen
      • Re: unequal to 29, Gerry Myerson
  • Re: unequal to 29, Zdislav V. Kovarik
  • Re: unequal to 29, mm
  • Re: unequal to 29, mm
• complex number questions, mojo
  • Re: complex number questions, Joseph Fagan
• metric in which balls are triangles, lukasz
  • Re: metric in which balls are triangles, Robert Israel
    • Re: metric in which balls are triangles, Lee Rudolph
      • Re: metric in which balls are triangles, Robert B. Israel
      • Re: metric in which balls are triangles, lukasz
    • Re: metric in which balls are triangles, Herman Rubin
      • Re: metric in which balls are triangles, Robert Israel
      • Re: metric in which balls are triangles, Herman Rubin
      • Re: metric in which balls are triangles, Robert Israel
  • Re: metric in which balls are triangles, W. Dale Hall
    • Re: metric in which balls are triangles, lukasz
      • Re: metric in which balls are triangles, W. Dale Hall
  • Re: metric in which balls are triangles, Amadeus Train-Owwell Zirconium
    • Re: metric in which balls are triangles, lukasz
• Simple Statistics Question., Ashok. R
  • Re: Simple Statistics Question., Ken Pledger
• Cardinality question, Bart Killam
  • Re: Cardinality question, Larry Hammick
    • Re: Cardinality question, Eckard Blumschein
      • Re: Cardinality question, fishfry
      • Re: Cardinality question, Eckard Blumschein
      • Re: Cardinality question, Torkel Franzen
      • Re: Cardinality question, Eckard Blumschein
      • Re: Cardinality question, Torkel Franzen
      • Re: Cardinality question, Eckard Blumschein
      • Re: Cardinality question, Torkel Franzen
      • Re: Cardinality question, Eckard Blumschein
      • Re: Cardinality question, Torkel Franzen
      • Re: Cardinality question, Larry Hammick
      • Re: Cardinality question, Eckard Blumschein
      • Re: Cardinality question, Larry Hammick
      • Re: Cardinality question, Herman Rubin
      • Re: Cardinality question, Eckard Blumschein
      • Re: Cardinality question, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Cardinality question, Torkel Franzen
      • Re: Cardinality question, Larry Hammick
      • Re: Cardinality question, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Cardinality question, Larry Hammick
      • Re: Cardinality question, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Cardinality question, Peter Webb
      • Re: Cardinality question, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Cardinality question, Peter Webb
      • Re: Cardinality question, Torkel Franzen
      • Re: Cardinality question, Ross A. Finlayson
      • Re: Cardinality question, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Cardinality question, Nath Rao
      • Re: Cardinality question, Torkel Franzen
      • Re: Cardinality question, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Cardinality question, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Cardinality question, Eckard Blumschein
      • Re: Cardinality question, Torkel Franzen
      • Re: Cardinality question, Eckard Blumschein
      • Re: Cardinality question, Torkel Franzen
      • Re: Cardinality question, Eckard Blumschein
      • Re: Cardinality question, Torkel Franzen
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Cardinality question, Franziska Neugebauer
      • Re: Cardinality question, Will Twentyman
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Cardinality question, Robin Chapman
      • Re: Cardinality question, Dave Rusin
      • Re: Cardinality question, A N Niel
      • Re: Cardinality question, Gerry Myerson
      • Re: Cardinality question, Matt Gutting
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Cardinality question, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Cardinality question, stephen
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Cardinality question, Dave Seaman
      • Re: Cardinality question, Eckard Blumschein
      • Re: Cardinality question, Torkel Franzen
      • Re: Cardinality question, Eckard Blumschein
      • Re: Cardinality question, Torkel Franzen
      • Re: Cardinality question, Ross A. Finlayson
      • Re: Cardinality question, Ross A. Finlayson
  • Re: Cardinality question, Stephen J. Herschkorn
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Cardinality question, Robin Chapman
  • Re: Cardinality question, Albert Wagner
• Re: Properties of eigenvalue decomposition?, Tomas Ukkonen
  • Re: Properties of eigenvalue decomposition?, Robert Israel
• Tensor, Gil-Galad
  • Re: Tensor, Robert Kolker
  • Re: Tensor, Tobin Fricke
• Is using a binomial distribution right?, vesper_carmen
  • Re: Is using a binomial distribution right?, patrick
    • Re: Is using a binomial distribution right?, vesper_carmen
  • Re: Is using a binomial distribution right?, Keith A. Lewis
    • Re: Is using a binomial distribution right?, patrick
• riemannian isometry example, Saem T.
  • Re: riemannian isometry example, Saem T.
    • Re: riemannian isometry example, W. Dale Hall
    • Re: riemannian isometry example, LD
    • Re: riemannian isometry example - 2nd posting attempt, JEMebius
• What does it mean to find a branch of root(1-z)?, dalthman
  • Re: What does it mean to find a branch of root(1-z)?, Zdislav V. Kovarik
• three interpenetrating cubes, Canon
  • Re: three interpenetrating cubes, David Kastrup
    • Re: three interpenetrating cubes, Canon
• Reciprocal space in a hypersphere or in a hyperoctahedron, Pekka Virtanen
• solving equation math-fractal (Cantor), octavian
  • Re: solving equation math-fractal (Cantor), Randy Poe
  • Re: solving equation math-fractal (Cantor), G. A. Edgar
• Online graduate abstact/modern algebra course?, PermutedPress
• inverse function, correction, dumb_founded
  • Re: inverse function, correction, José Carlos Santos
  • Re: inverse function, correction, A N Niel
• Re: Not complicated, weird situation, Jesse F. Hughes
  • Re: Not complicated, weird situation, bryant_j_j
    • Re: Not complicated, weird situation, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Not complicated, weird situation, bryant_j_j
      • Re: Not complicated, weird situation, Jesse F. Hughes
• Mathematical Invalidity of the Lorentz Transformation, aleksandar . vukelja
  • Re: Mathematical Invalidity of the Lorentz Transformation, brightice2001
    • Re: Mathematical Invalidity of the Lorentz Transformation, Aleksandar Vukelja
      • Re: Mathematical Invalidity of the Lorentz Transformation, Too Many Kooks Spoil the Brothel
• Plase help with combinatorics, Néstor
  • Re: Plase help with combinatorics, Lynn Kurtz
    • Re: Plase help with combinatorics, Néstor
    • Re: Plase help with combinatorics, Néstor
      • Re: Plase help with combinatorics, Lynn Kurtz
      • Re: Plase help with combinatorics, Néstor
      • Re: Plase help with combinatorics, Martin Shobe
  • Re: Plase help with combinatorics, John Roberts-Jones
    • Re: Plase help with combinatorics, Néstor
    • Re: Plase help with combinatorics, Lynn Kurtz
      • Re: Plase help with combinatorics, Chip Eastham
      • Re: Plase help with combinatorics, Lynn Kurtz
      • Re: Plase help with combinatorics, Chip Eastham
      • Re: Plase help with combinatorics, John Roberts-Jones
      • Re: Plase help with combinatorics, Harry Jameson
      • Re: Plase help with combinatorics, Néstor
• inverse function, dumb_founded
  • Re: inverse function, Vitaliy Kushnirevych
  • Re: inverse function, A N Niel
  • Re: inverse function, William Elliot
• Measures decomposition on a borel set sigma algebra., Seratend
  • Re: Measures decomposition on a borel set sigma algebra., David C . Ullrich
    • Re: Measures decomposition on a borel set sigma algebra., Seratend
      • Re: Measures decomposition on a borel set sigma algebra., Seratend
      • Re: Measures decomposition on a borel set sigma algebra., Seratend
      • Re: Measures decomposition on a borel set sigma algebra., David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Measures decomposition on a borel set sigma algebra., Seratend
• Re: SF Theorem, practical?, Jesse F. Hughes
• mental arithmetic feat attempt today, David Bernier
  • Re: mental arithmetic feat attempt today, Jeremy Boden
    • Re: mental arithmetic feat attempt today, Oscar Lanzi III
    • Re: mental arithmetic feat attempt today, Yves Euld?de
• Help: Coding theory and Probability, blazer320
  • Re: Help: Coding theory and Probability, Proginoskes
    • Re: Help: Coding theory and Probability, Randy Poe
  • Re: Coding theory and Probability, Peter Webb
  • Re: Help: Coding theory and Probability, William Hughes
    • Re: Help: Coding theory and Probability, Proginoskes
• Need a low mortage rate?, "Eldon Nixon"
  • Re: Need a low mortage rate?, fishfry
• Binary matrix Combinatorics., Bon Wook. Koo.
  • Re: Binary matrix Combinatorics., Robert Israel
• doubts on linear algebra, ramki
  • Re: doubts on linear algebra, Proginoskes
    • Re: doubts on linear algebra, Gerry Myerson
      • Re: doubts on linear algebra, Proginoskes
  • Re: doubts on linear algebra, A N Niel
  • Re: doubts on linear algebra, Arturo Magidin
• ((((((((Probability question))))))))), Dark Angel
  • Re: ((((((((Probability question))))))))), Randy Poe
  • Re: ((((((((Probability question))))))))), Keith A. Lewis
  • Re: ((((((((Probability question))))))))), Mkajuma
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: ((((((((Probability question))))))))), Dark Angel
• Re: G.H.Hardy gave an invalid proof of Infinitude of Primes in "A, Dror Speiser
  • Re: G.H.Hardy gave an invalid proof of Infinitude of Primes in "A, sttscitrans
• Question on Orientation of manifold..., Tony
  • Re: Question on Orientation of manifold..., Larry Hammick
    • Re: Question on Orientation of manifold..., Tony
      • Re: Question on Orientation of manifold..., Lee Rudolph
      • Re: Question on Orientation of manifold..., Tony
      • Re: Question on Orientation of manifold..., Larry Hammick
  • Re: Question on Orientation of manifold..., LD
    • Re: Question on Orientation of manifold..., Tony
      • Re: Question on Orientation of manifold..., LD
• Adding kernels and cokernels to categories, Gonēalo Rodrigues
• magic 9 digit numbers, Sazan Suzan
  • Re: magic 9 digit numbers, James Waldby
    • Re: magic 9 digit numbers, Gerry Myerson
    • Re: magic 9 digit numbers, James Waldby
    • Re: magic 9 digit numbers, William Elliot
    • Re: magic 9 digit numbers, Robert Israel
    • Re: magic 9 digit numbers, Christian Bau
      • Re: magic 9 digit numbers, James Waldby
  • Re: magic 9 digit numbers, Arturo Magidin
• Quick question about dyadic products, Madhusudan Singh
  • Re: Quick question about dyadic products, Jim Spriggs
• Re: work group problem. I can't solve this problem., Sazan Suzan
  • Re: work group problem. I can't solve this problem., Russell
• Still unsolved?, Tapio
• Question about limit of positive measurable functions being measurable, worldsofsolution
  • Re: Question about limit of positive measurable functions being measurable, The World Wide Wade
    • Re: Question about limit of positive measurable functions being measurable, worldsofsolution
      • Re: Question about limit of positive measurable functions being measurable, worldsofsolution
      • Re: Question about limit of positive measurable functions being measurable, The World Wide Wade
• Combinations, recurrence formula and asymptotic, Alex Vinokur
  • Re: Combinations, recurrence formula and asymptotic, Robert Israel
• Possible use of AC, Michael Stemper
  • Re: Possible use of AC, Stephen J. Herschkorn
    • Re: Possible use of AC, Dave Seaman
    • Re: Possible use of AC, denis feldmann
• Multidimensional rectangle partition, Thomas Heinz
• Generators for gamma(11), 柳楽盛男
  • Re: Generators for gamma(11),
• Abstract Algebra in AI and Data Mining, Babak
  • Re: Abstract Algebra in AI and Data Mining, David M Einstein
  • Re: Abstract Algebra in AI and Data Mining, Paul Danaher
    • Re: Abstract Algebra in AI and Data Mining, Babak Arjmandnia
      • Re: Abstract Algebra in AI and Data Mining, Christopher J. Henrich
      • Re: Abstract Algebra in AI and Data Mining, gds
• math and fractal (Cantor's fractal) equation solving_1, octavian
  • Re: math and fractal (Cantor's fractal) equation solving_1, G. A. Edgar
• math and fractal (Cantor's fractal) equation solving, octavian
  • Re: math and fractal (Cantor's fractal) equation solving, G. A. Edgar
• Simple Decision and Discrete problem, Zarar Mohammed
  • Re: Simple Decision and Discrete problem, Gerry Myerson
    • Re: Simple Decision and Discrete problem, Ed Hook
• tournament graph with incomplete data, Boris
• On Conditional PDF, USENET
  • Re: On Conditional PDF, Stephen J. Herschkorn
    • Re: On Conditional PDF, USENET
  • Re: On Conditional PDF, Robert Israel
    • Re: On Conditional PDF, Stephen J. Herschkorn
      • Re: On Conditional PDF, Stephen J. Herschkorn
      • Re: On Conditional PDF, Robert Israel
      • Re: On Conditional PDF, Robert Israel
• Simple Calculus Question, mitch
  • Re: Simple Calculus Question, William Elliot
  • Re: Simple Calculus Question, William Elliot
    • Re: Simple Calculus Question, Philippe 92
  • Re: Simple Calculus Question, Lynn Kurtz
    • Re: Simple Calculus Question, Philippe 92
      • Re: Simple Calculus Question, mitch
      • Re: Simple Calculus Question, Philippe 92
      • Re: Simple Calculus Question, mitch
    • Re: Simple Calculus Question, William Elliot
      • Re: Simple Calculus Question, Lynn Kurtz
• Fourier transform of a time-frequency function, Carine
  • Re: Fourier transform of a time-frequency function, Jeroen Boschma
• The most composite number, Hauke Reddmann
  • Re: The most composite number, Pubkeybreaker
    • Re: The most composite number, Randy Poe
      • Re: The most composite number, Pubkeybreaker
      • Re: The most composite number, Zdislav V. Kovarik
      • Re: The most composite number, Hauke Reddmann
      • Re: The most composite number, Pubkeybreaker
• Re: test, Proginoskes
  • Re: test, Matt Gutting
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • test, Laura
• ring theory proof help, warren065
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • ring theory proof help, warren065
    • Re: ring theory proof help, Proginoskes
      • Re: ring theory proof help, warren065
      • Re: ring theory proof help, Proginoskes
    • Re: ring theory proof help, Saint Cad
• Constructing vector field., David
  • Re: Constructing vector field., W. Dale Hall
  • Re: Constructing vector field., Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
• Divisibility..., Fati
  • Re: Divisibility..., William Elliot
  • Re: Divisibility..., Pubkeybreaker
    • Re: Divisibility..., William Elliot
      • Re: Divisibility..., Pubkeybreaker
      • Re: Divisibility..., William Elliot
• Differential equation with norm, Jon Slaughter
  • Re: Differential equation with norm, Jon Slaughter
  • Re: Differential equation with norm, Robert Israel
• Re: product of random matrices, roy
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: product of random matrices, Robert Israel
    • Re: product of random matrices, roy
      • Re: product of random matrices, Robert Israel
• Perplexing coin-flipping probabilities, google
  • Re: Perplexing coin-flipping probabilities, Virgil
  • Re: Perplexing coin-flipping probabilities, Stephen J. Herschkorn
  • Re: Perplexing coin-flipping probabilities, Alon Amit
  • Re: Perplexing coin-flipping probabilities, No Way
  • Re: Perplexing coin-flipping probabilities, cbrown
• Matrix representation of equations, A. Boom
  • Re: Matrix representation of equations, Rod
    • Re: Matrix representation of equations, A. Boom
  • Re: Matrix representation of equations, Dave Rusin
    • Re: Matrix representation of equations, A. Boom
• Michigan v. Wisconsin...?, fanoplane
  • Re: Michigan v. Wisconsin...?, bryant_j_j
  • Re: Michigan v. Wisconsin...?, CapCity
  • Re: Michigan v. Wisconsin...?, Pubkeybreaker
    • Re: Michigan v. Wisconsin...?, fanoplane
      • Re: Michigan v. Wisconsin...?, Tony
• Question on Orientation of vector spaces..., Tony
  • Re: Question on Orientation of vector spaces..., LD
• (Humor) You Might be a Mathematician if ... (Humor), Aubrey Jaffer
• Re: spy problem, Stan Liou
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: spy problem, Sazan Suzan
• Re: nine digits number, Stan Liou
  • Re: nine digits number, Larry Hammick
    • Re: nine digits number, Larry Hammick
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: nine digits number, Larry Hammick
    • Re: nine digits number, Sazan Suzan
      • Re: nine digits number, Christian Bau
      • Re: nine digits number, Larry Hammick
    • Re: nine digits number, Sazan Suzan
• cutting cords, Sazan Suzan
  • Re: cutting cords, Robert Israel
• players of a football team, Sazan Suzan
  • Re: players of a football team, Robert Israel
• summation expression, jumpstart
  • Re: summation expression, Gerry Myerson
    • Re: summation expression, Virgil
• five computers connected with four cable, Sazan Suzan
  • Re: five computers connected with four cable, Gerry Myerson
  • Re: five computers connected with four cable, Proginoskes
    • Re: five computers connected with four cable, Sazan Suzan
  • Re: five computers connected with four cable, Dave Rusin
    • Re: five computers connected with four cable, Gerry Myerson
• Re: Grid subgraph prize problems, James Waldby
  • Re: Grid subgraph prize problems, Philippe 92
    • Re: Grid subgraph prize problems, James Waldby
      • Re: Grid subgraph prize problems, Philippe 92
  • Re: Grid subgraph prize problems, Jan Kristian Haugland
• mathematical notations - rich text, jumpstart
  • Re: mathematical notations - rich text, Proginoskes
    • Re: mathematical notations - rich text, Robert Israel
      • Re: mathematical notations - rich text, jumpstart
• Relation between continued fractions and transcendental numbers?, Snis Pilbor
  • Re: Relation between continued fractions and transcendental numbers?, Justin Young
    • Re: Relation between continued fractions and transcendental numbers?, Justin Young
  • Re: Relation between continued fractions and transcendental numbers?, steve_wildstrom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Relation between continued fractions and transcendental numbers?, Gerry Myerson
    • Re: Relation between continued fractions and transcendental numbers?, Bill Dubuque
• Sara'sgoat Farting, Jonny
• differential equation question, mojo
  • Re: differential equation question, Proginoskes
  • Re: differential equation question, Oscar Lanzi III
• countability of rationals, giganut
  • Re: countability of rationals, Justin Young
  • Re: countability of rationals, Dave Seaman
  • Re: countability of rationals, W. Dale Hall
  • Re: countability of rationals, Arturo Magidin
    • Re: countability of rationals, giganut
      • Re: countability of rationals, Randy Poe
      • Re: countability of rationals, giganut
      • Re: countability of rationals, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: countability of rationals, giganut
      • Re: countability of rationals, Justin Young
      • Re: countability of rationals, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: countability of rationals, Daniel W. Johnson
      • Re: countability of rationals, Stephen J. Herschkorn
      • Re: countability of rationals, Virgil
      • Re: countability of rationals, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: countability of rationals, Virgil
      • Re: countability of rationals, Virgil
      • Re: countability of rationals, Christian Bau
      • Re: countability of rationals, giganut
      • Re: countability of rationals, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: countability of rationals, Virgil
      • Re: countability of rationals, Dik T. Winter
      • Re: countability of rationals, Ross A. Finlayson
      • Re: countability of rationals, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: countability of rationals, Stephen J. Herschkorn
      • Re: countability of rationals, Randy Poe
      • Re: countability of rationals, Hopp Family
  • Re: countability of rationals, Russell
  • Re: countability of rationals, Robert Kolker
    • Re: countability of rationals, Justin Young
  • Re: countability of rationals, Virgil
    • Re: countability of rationals, poopdeville
      • Re: countability of rationals, oscwr
      • Re: countability of rationals, Robert Kolker
      • Re: countability of rationals, oscwr
      • Re: countability of rationals, Dave Seaman
      • Re: countability of rationals, Michael Stemper
• series help, jumpstart
  • Re: series help, Lynn Kurtz
    • Re: series help, jumpstart
• A Function With Integer Derivatives, Leroy Quet
  • Re: A Function With Integer Derivatives, Gerry Myerson
    • Re: A Function With Integer Derivatives, Leroy Quet
• Can be parabolic?, Abdulla
• Surrogating factors, guenther.vonKnakspott@xxxxxx
• Harris was right, judgement is upon us, guenther.vonKnakspott@xxxxxx
• tuning the parameter ncv in arpack-dsaupd., Javier Almeida
• x^2 + y^2 + z^2 = r^2 + s^2 + t^2, Pavel Pokorny
  • Re: x^2 + y^2 + z^2 = r^2 + s^2 + t^2, Proginoskes
  • Re: x^2 + y^2 + z^2 = r^2 + s^2 + t^2, cacak5
    • Re: x^2 + y^2 + z^2 = r^2 + s^2 + t^2, Pavel Pokorny
  • Re: x^2 + y^2 + z^2 = r^2 + s^2 + t^2, Tapio
    • Re: x^2 + y^2 + z^2 = r^2 + s^2 + t^2, Proginoskes
    • Re: x^2 + y^2 + z^2 = r^2 + s^2 + t^2, Zdislav V. Kovarik
      • Re: x^2 + y^2 + z^2 = r^2 + s^2 + t^2, Tapio
  • Re: x^2 + y^2 + z^2 = r^2 + s^2 + t^2, bill . daly
    • Re: x^2 + y^2 + z^2 = r^2 + s^2 + t^2, bill . daly
      • Re: x^2 + y^2 + z^2 = r^2 + s^2 + t^2, Bill Dubuque
  • Re: x^2 + y^2 + z^2 = r^2 + s^2 + t^2, Gerry Myerson
  • Re: x^2 + y^2 + z^2 = r^2 + s^2 + t^2, Dave Rusin
  • Re: x^2 + y^2 + z^2 = r^2 + s^2 + t^2, Zdislav V. Kovarik
  • Re: x^2 + y^2 + z^2 = r^2 + s^2 + t^2, john_ramsden
    • Re: x^2 + y^2 + z^2 = r^2 + s^2 + t^2, john_ramsden
  • Re: x^2 + y^2 + z^2 = r^2 + s^2 + t^2, bill . daly
  • Re: x^2 + y^2 + z^2 = r^2 + s^2 + t^2, Tapio
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: x^2 + y^2 + z^2 = r^2 + s^2 + t^2, Tapio
• New York TimesMagazine Article, PeabodyLowell&BigelowLLC
  • Re: New York TimesMagazine Article, cacak5
    • Re: New York TimesMagazine Article, Thomson & Thompson
  • Re: New York TimesMagazine Article, Thomson & Thompson
  • Re: New York TimesMagazine Article, Stephen J. Herschkorn
    • Re: New York TimesMagazine Article, Thomson & Thompson
• Unitary group over a finite field, carlsquared
  • Re: Unitary group over a finite field, Jeremy Dover
    • Re: Unitary group over a finite field, carlsquared
    • Re: Unitary group over a finite field,
• Fraction equal to random text, O.H.
  • Re: Fraction equal to random text, Proginoskes
  • Re: Fraction equal to random text, Robert Israel
• Help with a formula on %., PIZ
  • Re: Help with a formula on %., Pubkeybreaker
    • Re: Help with a formula on %., Rod
      • Re: Help with a formula on %., Pubkeybreaker
  • Re: Help with a formula on %., alain verghote
• Origin of "Zero Sum Game", mralls
  • Re: Origin of "Zero Sum Game", Larry Lard
    • Re: Origin of "Zero Sum Game", briggs
  • Re: Origin of "Zero Sum Game", G. A. Edgar
    • Re: Origin of "Zero Sum Game", Robert Vienneau
  • Re: Origin of "Zero Sum Game", Robert Kolker
  • Origin of "Zero Sum Game", Just Me
  • Re: Origin of "Zero Sum Game", Zdislav V. Kovarik
    • Re: Origin of "Zero Sum Game", T Block
  • Re: Origin of "Zero Sum Game", Keith A. Lewis
    • Re: Origin of "Zero Sum Game", Dave Seaman
  • Re: Origin of "Zero Sum Game", Larry Hammick
    • Re: Origin of "Zero Sum Game", Herman Rubin
  • Re: Origin of "Zero Sum Game", Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
• " More fun not to compete ", alain verghote
  • Re: " More fun not to compete ", tomlewton1
    • Re: " More fun not to compete ", bernard massé
      • Re: " More fun not to compete ", Pubkeybreaker
      • [OT] Re: " More fun not to compete ", Stephen J. Herschkorn
  • Re: " More fun not to compete ", Larry Hammick
• New mathematics/physical sciences positions at http://jobs.phds.org, April 04, 2005, PhDs . org Webmaster
• How to compute submatrix inverses efficiently?, Josh
• special example manifold T_2, Saem T.
  • Re: special example manifold T_2, W. Dale Hall
    • Re: special example manifold T_2, Saem T.
      • Re: special example manifold T_2, W. Dale Hall
• NP- hard ( approximation algos), jumpstart
• New Su Doku puzzles in New York Post, easysurf
• JSH: Was a puzzle, not any more, jstevh
  • Re: JSH: Was a puzzle, not any more, bryant_j_j
    • Re: JSH: Was a puzzle, not any more, bryant_j_j
      • Re: JSH: Was a puzzle, not any more, Felix Rawlings
  • Re: JSH: Was a puzzle, not any more, William Hughes
  • Re: JSH: Was a puzzle, not any more, Gib Bogle
    • Re: JSH: Was a puzzle, not any more, W. Dale Hall
  • Re: JSH: Was a puzzle, not any more, Jesse F. Hughes
    • Re: JSH: Was a puzzle, not any more, jstevh
      • Re: JSH: Was a puzzle, not any more, Jesse F. Hughes
  • Re: JSH: Was a puzzle, not any more, Hames Steven Jarris
    • Re: JSH: Was a puzzle, not any more, john_ramsden
  • Re: Was a puzzle, not any more, ošin
  • Re: JSH: Was a puzzle, not any more, C. Bond
  • Re: JSH: Was a puzzle, not any more, Proginoskes
    • Re: JSH: Was a puzzle, not any more, Nora Baron
      • Re: JSH: Was a puzzle, not any more, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: JSH: Was a puzzle, not any more, Proginoskes
      • Re: JSH: Was a puzzle, not any more, john_ramsden
      • Re: JSH: Was a puzzle, not any more, Michael Stemper
      • Re: JSH: Was a puzzle, not any more, Gib Bogle
      • Re: JSH: Was a puzzle, not any more, Matt Gutting
      • Re: JSH: Was a puzzle, not any more, David Kastrup
      • Re: JSH: Was a puzzle, not any more, ošin
      • Re: JSH: Was a puzzle, not any more, Michael Stemper
• Re: The origin of science, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
  • Re: The origin of science, Robert Kolker
  • Re: The origin of science, Robert Kolker
  • Re: The origin of science, mzafrullah
    • Re: The origin of science, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
      • Re: The origin of science, mzafrullah
      • Re: The origin of science, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
      • Re: The origin of science, mzafrullah
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: The origin of science, mzafrullah
    • Re: The origin of science, bryant_j_j
• soluble radical of GL(n,q), si
  • Re: soluble radical of GL(n,q), Jim Heckman
    • Re: soluble radical of GL(n,q),
• Re: the honesty we expect of math people from Berkeley-- Arturo Magidin Re: Euclid's actual proof - have at it!, Larry Hammick
  • Re: the honesty we expect of math people from Berkeley-- Arturo Magidin Re: Euclid's actual proof - have at it!, Paul Pollack
    • Re: the honesty we expect of math people from Berkeley-- Arturo Magidin Re: Euclid's actual proof - have at it!, Larry Hammick
• Re: defining straightness, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
• Hyperbolic components of the Mandelbrot set, Mark Douglas
  • Re: Hyperbolic components of the Mandelbrot set, Keith A. Lewis
    • Re: Hyperbolic components of the Mandelbrot set, Ioannis
• 3rd degree problem, George
  • Re: 3rd degree problem, Jannick Asmus
  • Re: 3rd degree problem, Rouben Rostamian
  • Re: 3rd degree problem, G.E. Ivey
  • Re: 3rd degree problem, sttscitrans
• vectorfield, maarte
  • Re: vectorfield, Jannick Asmus
  • Re: vectorfield, Stuart M Newberger
• math typing problem, vidyamanoharasharma
• Re: Can anyone help me with those discrete math problems?, Barry Schwarz
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Can anyone help me with those discrete math problems?, cbrown
• Re: Cassinian Ovals, Narasimham G.L.
• Does the series 1 - 1/2 - 1/3 + 1/4 + 1/5 - 1/6 - 1/7 + 1/8 + 1/9 + ... converges?, dalthman
  • Re: Does the series 1 - 1/2 - 1/3 + 1/4 + 1/5 - 1/6 - 1/7 + 1/8 + 1/9 + ... converges?, Daniel W. Johnson
    • Re: Does the series 1 - 1/2 - 1/3 + 1/4 + 1/5 - 1/6 - 1/7 + 1/8 + 1/9 + ... converges?, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Does the series 1 - 1/2 - 1/3 + 1/4 + 1/5 - 1/6 - 1/7 + 1/8 + 1/9 + ... converges?, Daniel W. Johnson
  • Re: Does the series 1 - 1/2 - 1/3 + 1/4 + 1/5 - 1/6 - 1/7 + 1/8 + 1/9 + ... converges?, José Carlos Santos
    • Re: Does the series 1 - 1/2 - 1/3 + 1/4 + 1/5 - 1/6 - 1/7 + 1/8 + 1/9 + ... converges?, G.E. Ivey
      • Re: Does the series 1 - 1/2 - 1/3 + 1/4 + 1/5 - 1/6 - 1/7 + 1/8 + 1/9 + ... converges?, The World Wide Wade
      • Re: Does the series 1 - 1/2 - 1/3 + 1/4 + 1/5 - 1/6 - 1/7 + 1/8 + 1/9 + ... converges?, Daniel W. Johnson
      • Re: Does the series 1 - 1/2 - 1/3 + 1/4 + 1/5 - 1/6 - 1/7 + 1/8 + 1/9 + ... converges?, The World Wide Wade
  • Re: Does the series 1 - 1/2 - 1/3 + 1/4 + 1/5 - 1/6 - 1/7 + 1/8 + 1/9 + ... converges?, A N Niel
    • Re: Does the series 1 - 1/2 - 1/3 + 1/4 + 1/5 - 1/6 - 1/7 + 1/8 + 1/9 + ... converges?, Justin Young
      • Re: Does the series 1 - 1/2 - 1/3 + 1/4 + 1/5 - 1/6 - 1/7 + 1/8 + 1/9 + ... converges?, José Carlos Santos
      • Re: Does the series 1 - 1/2 - 1/3 + 1/4 + 1/5 - 1/6 - 1/7 + 1/8 + 1/9 + ... converges?, The World Wide Wade
      • Re: Does the series 1 - 1/2 - 1/3 + 1/4 + 1/5 - 1/6 - 1/7 + 1/8 + 1/9 + ... converges?, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Does the series 1 - 1/2 - 1/3 + 1/4 + 1/5 - 1/6 - 1/7 + 1/8 + 1/9 + ... converges?, The World Wide Wade
  • Re: Does the series 1 - 1/2 - 1/3 + 1/4 + 1/5 - 1/6 - 1/7 + 1/8 + 1/9 + ... converges?, Virgil
  • Re: Does the series 1 - 1/2 - 1/3 + 1/4 + 1/5 - 1/6 - 1/7 + 1/8 + 1/9 + ... converges?, Travis Willse
    • Re: Does the series 1 - 1/2 - 1/3 + 1/4 + 1/5 - 1/6 - 1/7 + 1/8 + 1/9 + ... converges?, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Does the series 1 - 1/2 - 1/3 + 1/4 + 1/5 - 1/6 - 1/7 + 1/8 + 1/9 + ... converges?, Daniel W. Johnson
      • Re: Does the series 1 - 1/2 - 1/3 + 1/4 + 1/5 - 1/6 - 1/7 + 1/8 + 1/9 + ... converges?, José Carlos Santos
  • Re: Does the series 1 - 1/2 - 1/3 + 1/4 + 1/5 - 1/6 - 1/7 + 1/8 + 1/9 + ... converges?, Tim Norfolk
  • Re: Does the series 1 - 1/2 - 1/3 + 1/4 + 1/5 - 1/6 - 1/7 + 1/8 + 1/9 + ... converges?, dalthman
  • Re: Does the series 1 - 1/2 - 1/3 + 1/4 + 1/5 - 1/6 - 1/7 + 1/8 + 1/9 + ... converges?, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
    • Re: Does the series 1 - 1/2 - 1/3 + 1/4 + 1/5 - 1/6 - 1/7 + 1/8 + 1/9 + ... converges?, Zdislav V. Kovarik
• Integers mod p, Lawrence House
  • Re: Integers mod p, Keith Ramsay
• Counterexample: non-nilpotent formal power series with nilpotent coefficients, daniel . wolff
  • Re: Counterexample: non-nilpotent formal power series with nilpotent coefficients, Axel Vogt
    • Re: Counterexample: non-nilpotent formal power series with nilpotent coefficients, daniel . wolff
• Quaternions : n-Space Basis Matrices, Sundar Krishnan
  • Re: Quaternions : n-Space Basis Matrices, Sundar Krishnan
• e-permutation tensor, tristan . buckmaster
  • Re: e-permutation tensor, Oscar Lanzi III
    • Re: e-permutation tensor, tristan . buckmaster
• Is this possible?, john
  • Re: Is this possible?, A N Niel
  • Re: Is this possible?, Lynn Kurtz
  • Re: Is this possible?, Proginoskes
• fields, e . sigward
  • Re: fields, G. A. Edgar
    • Re: fields, Eric Sigward
• Feller, chapter 1, problem 5c, Roger
  • Re: Feller, chapter 1, problem 5c, A N Niel
  • Re: Feller, chapter 1, problem 5c, The Qurqirish Dragon
• Re: "Number" of elements; was: Distinct linear orderings on Z, Jesse F. Hughes
  • Re: "Number" of elements; was: Distinct linear orderings on Z, Robert Kolker
    • Re: "Number" of elements; was: Distinct linear orderings on Z, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: "Number" of elements; was: Distinct linear orderings on Z, Robert Kolker
• Re: A good intro. to analysis, Brad Lucier
• Re: Assistance for Math "Newbie", Brad Lucier
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Assistance for Math "Newbie", AndrewC
• Re: SCALAR Inner Products ?, Terry Padden
  • Re: SCALAR Inner Products ?, cbrown
  • Re: SCALAR Inner Products ?, tomlewton1
  • Re: SCALAR Inner Products ?, LD
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: SCALAR Inner Products ?, Terry Padden
  • Re: SCALAR Inner Products ?, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
• The name and LaTeX symbol for 'relation is defined on' math symbol, porky_pig_jr@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: The name and LaTeX symbol for 'relation is defined on' math symbol, Stan Liou
    • Re: The name and LaTeX symbol for 'relation is defined on' math symbol, porky_pig_jr@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: The name and LaTeX symbol for 'relation is defined on' math symbol, Igor Khavkine
    • Re: The name and LaTeX symbol for 'relation is defined on' math symbol, porky_pig_jr@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: The name and LaTeX symbol for 'relation is defined on' math symbol, Paul Sperry
      • Re: The name and LaTeX symbol for 'relation is defined on' math symbol, Dave Rusin
• Another Lie group question..., Tony
  • Re: Another Lie group question..., Tony
    • Re: Another Lie group question..., Jannick Asmus
• Re: New pyramid?, Roligtroll
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: New pyramid?, cbrown
• arithmetic problem, RichD
  • Re: arithmetic problem, Roligtroll
    • Re: arithmetic problem, RichD
  • Re: arithmetic problem, mm
    • Re: arithmetic problem, RichD
      • Re: arithmetic problem, mm
      • Re: arithmetic problem, mm
  • Re: arithmetic problem, William Elliot
    • Re: arithmetic problem, William Elliot
      • Re: arithmetic problem, RichD
      • Re: arithmetic problem, William Elliot
    • Re: arithmetic problem, Virgil
      • Re: arithmetic problem, RichD
  • Re: arithmetic problem, Mark Hauerbach
    • Re: arithmetic problem, RichD
  • Re: arithmetic problem, Bill Dubuque
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • arithmetic problem, Virgil
    • Re: arithmetic problem, Philippe 92
      • Re: arithmetic problem, Virgil
      • Re: arithmetic problem, Philippe 92
  • Arithmetic Problem, Virgil
    • Re: Arithmetic Problem, mm
      • Re: Arithmetic Problem, Virgil
      • Re: Arithmetic Problem, mm
• a question about vector calculus, A net user
  • Re: a question about vector calculus, A net user
    • Re: a question about vector calculus, Igor Khavkine
      • Re: a question about vector calculus, A net user
      • Re: a question about vector calculus, Igor Khavkine
• Simple Statistics Problem, HateSpam
  • Re: Simple Statistics Problem, Stephen J. Herschkorn
    • Re: Simple Statistics Problem, Virgil
  • re:Simple Statistics Problem, mathman
• Laplace Transform, Chris Smith
  • Re: Laplace Transform, Robert B. Israel
• notation, Vec
  • Re: notation, W. Dale Hall
  • Re: notation, Stephen J. Herschkorn
• Convex set problem., xydarcher
  • Re: Convex set problem., Marc Olschok
• Question on sines and mappings (for analysts I guess), Matt Gutting
  • Re: Question on sines and mappings (for analysts I guess), José Carlos Santos
    • Re: Question on sines and mappings (for analysts I guess), W. Dale Hall
    • Re: Question on sines and mappings (for analysts I guess), Matt Gutting
      • Re: Question on sines and mappings (for analysts I guess), José Carlos Santos
  • Re: Question on sines and mappings (for analysts I guess), A N Niel
    • Re: Question on sines and mappings (for analysts I guess), Matt Gutting
  • Re: Question on sines and mappings (for analysts I guess), Tim Little
• Re: e^(pi i) and all that, Dan in Philly
• Re: Minimax and null derivatives (repost), M.J.T. Guy
• TDOA Chans method, Ailly
• Venn Diagrams for Boolean Logic, Vec
  • Re: Venn Diagrams for Boolean Logic, ošin
  • Re: Venn Diagrams for Boolean Logic, bernard massé
• Lie-derivative, maarte
• indecomposable groups, Sukjah Roh
  • Re: indecomposable groups, Robin Chapman
• A new PROBLEM, hysenthomas
  • Re: A new PROBLEM, Phil Freedenberg
  • Re: A new PROBLEM, David C . Ullrich
  • Re: A new PROBLEM, Marc Olschok
    • Re: A new PROBLEM, john
      • Re: A new PROBLEM, cbrown
  • Re: A new PROBLEM, Lynn Kurtz
    • Re: A new PROBLEM, Lynn Kurtz
      • Re: A new PROBLEM, hysenthomas
      • Re: A new PROBLEM, Lynn Kurtz
• To crtn, concerning checkers., TLOlczyk,PhD
• Reversion coefficient polynomials, MCKAY john
  • Re: Reversion coefficient polynomials, Robin Chapman
• Re: Dickson and Dunham deliver invalid proofs of Euclid Infinitude of Primes, Lawrence House
  • Re: Dickson and Dunham deliver invalid proofs of Euclid Infinitude of Primes, Larry Hammick
• algebraic closure and finite extension, anthony
  • Re: algebraic closure and finite extension, Tonico
    • Re: algebraic closure and finite extension, Robin Chapman
• Lie groups basic question....., Tony
  • Re: Lie groups basic question....., Stuart M Newberger
    • Re: Lie groups basic question....., Tony
      • Re: Lie groups basic question....., José Carlos Santos
      • Re: Lie groups basic question....., Ed Hook
      • Re: Lie groups basic question....., Jannick Asmus
• Complex graphing, JamesLan
• JSH: Honesty, jstevh
  • Re: Honesty, Justin Young
    • Re: Honesty, jstevh
  • Re: JSH: Honesty, Gib Bogle
  • Re: Honesty, flip
  • Re: JSH: Honesty, Matt Gutting
    • Re: JSH: Honesty, Jesse F. Hughes
    • Re: JSH: Honesty, flip
    • Re: JSH: Honesty, David Kastrup
    • Re: JSH: Honesty, Ivan
      • Re: JSH: Honesty, José Carlos Santos
    • Re: JSH: Honesty, Nora Baron
      • Re: JSH: Honesty, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: JSH: Honesty, Nora Baron
      • Re: JSH: Honesty, Matt Gutting
  • Re: JSH: Honesty, David Ames
    • Re: JSH: Honesty, Matt Gutting
• soln of ex in "calculus" James Stewart 5e, fsshl
• JSH: It's over, jstevh
  • Re: JSH: It's over, Matt Gutting
  • Re: JSH: It's over, David Kastrup
  • Re: JSH: It's over, fishfry
    • Re: JSH: It's over, jstevh
      • Re: JSH: It's over, David Kastrup
      • Re: JSH: It's over, jstevh
    • Re: JSH: It's over, Gib Bogle
  • Re: JSH: It's over, fishfry
    • Re: JSH: It's over, William Hughes
  • Re: JSH: It's over, Gib Bogle
    • Re: JSH: It's over, jstevh
  • Re: JSH: It's over, Felix Rawlings
    • Re: JSH: It's over, jstevh
      • Re: JSH: It's over, Felix Rawlings
  • Re: JSH: It's over, Will Twentyman
    • Re: JSH: It's over, jstevh
      • Re: JSH: It's over, David Kastrup
      • Re: JSH: It's over, Will Twentyman
      • Re: JSH: It's over, jstevh
      • Re: JSH: It's over, C. Bond
      • Re: JSH: It's over, Will Twentyman
      • Re: JSH: It's over, Angus Rodgers
  • Re: JSH: It's over, stush
    • Re: JSH: It's over, Torkel Franzen
    • Re: JSH: It's over, David Kastrup
    • Re: JSH: It's over, jstevh
• Function is irreducible, jamesdickerson00
  • Re: Function is irreducible, Arturo Magidin
    • Re: Function is irreducible, jamesdickerson00
      • Re: Function is irreducible, Arturo Magidin
• Attractive orbits and Fatou sets, Mark Douglas
  • Re: Attractive orbits and Fatou sets, Robert Israel
• Coprimeness - I think I'm confused, but I'm not sure, Matt Gutting
  • Re: Coprimeness - I think I'm confused, but I'm not sure, W. Dale Hall
    • Re: Coprimeness - I think I'm confused, but I'm not sure, Matt Gutting
  • Re: Coprimeness - I think I'm confused, but I'm not sure, William Elliot
    • Re: Coprimeness - I think I'm confused, but I'm not sure, Matt Gutting
      • Re: Coprimeness - I think I'm confused, but I'm not sure, William Hughes
      • Re: Coprimeness - I think I'm confused, but I'm not sure, Russell
      • Re: Coprimeness - I think I'm confused, but I'm not sure, William Hughes
      • Re: Coprimeness - I think I'm confused, but I'm not sure, William Elliot
      • Re: Coprimeness - I think I'm confused, but I'm not sure, Matt Gutting
  • Re: Coprimeness - I think I'm confused, but I'm not sure, Arturo Magidin
    • Re: Coprimeness - I think I'm confused, but I'm not sure, Matt Gutting
      • Re: Coprimeness - I think I'm confused, but I'm not sure, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: Coprimeness - I think I'm confused, but I'm not sure, Matt Gutting
      • Re: Coprimeness - I think I'm confused, but I'm not sure, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: Coprimeness - I think I'm confused, but I'm not sure, David Rosoff
      • Re: Coprimeness - I think I'm confused, but I'm not sure, Matt Gutting
      • Re: Coprimeness - I think I'm confused, but I'm not sure, Arturo Magidin
  • Re: Coprimeness - I think I'm confused, but I'm not sure, Bill Dubuque
    • Re: Coprimeness - I think I'm confused, but I'm not sure, Matt Gutting
• 'Integral test'-related counterexample, khosra
  • Re: 'Integral test'-related counterexample, Justin Young
  • Re: 'Integral test'-related counterexample, Zdislav V. Kovarik
    • Re: 'Integral test'-related counterexample, khosra
• Re: Summing combinations to a known total problem, for cash-allocation / open-item accounting, stephen
  • Re: Summing combinations to a known total problem, for cash-allocation / open-item accounting, Randy Poe
    • Re: Summing combinations to a known total problem, for cash-allocation / open-item accounting, stephen
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Summing combinations to a known total problem, for cash-allocation / open-item accounting, Randy Poe
  • Re: Summing combinations to a known total problem, for cash-allocation / open-item accounting, Randy Poe
• Re: Distinct linear orderings on Z, Jesse F. Hughes
• The GREAT myth that murdered millions, Userbeam Remailer
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • The GREAT myth that murdered millions, George Orwell
• find the limit, TT
  • Re: find the limit, José Carlos Santos
    • Re: find the limit, TT
      • Re: find the limit, darrenlorent
      • Re: find the limit, José Carlos Santos
      • Re: find the limit, The World Wide Wade
• distinct infinte numbers, sreek
  • Re: distinct infinte numbers, ošin
  • Re: distinct infinte numbers, Justin Young
  • Re: distinct infinte numbers, Jesse F. Hughes
  • Re: distinct infinte numbers, G. A. Edgar
    • Re: distinct infinte numbers, David C . Ullrich
  • Re: distinct infinte numbers, Tim Little
• Probably simple matrix problem, please help., Samantha Ann Patterson
  • Re: Probably simple matrix problem, please help., Robert Israel
  • Re: Probably simple matrix problem, please help., Sylvain Croussette
• Re: Surrogate factoring now is new, Larry Hammick
• hausdorff distance, Jos? Mar?a C.G.
  • Re: hausdorff distance, Robin Chapman
    • Re: hausdorff distance, Jos? Mar?a C.G.
      • Re: hausdorff distance, William Elliot
      • Re: hausdorff distance, Narcoleptic Insomniac
      • Re: hausdorff distance, William Elliot
• A graph theory question - partitioning the edge set, Martin
  • Re: A graph theory question - partitioning the edge set, David Eppstein
• Question on the sieve of Eratosthenes (number of primes estimation error), Oscar
  • Re: Question on the sieve of Eratosthenes (number of primes estimation error), Randy Poe
  • Re: Question on the sieve of Eratosthenes (number of primes estimation error), Pubkeybreaker
• "Help wanted , solutions to x^y = y^x ", alain verghote
  • Re: "Help wanted , solutions to x^y = y^x ", Zdislav V. Kovarik
  • Re: "Help wanted , solutions to x^y = y^x ", A N Niel
  • Re: "Help wanted , solutions to x^y = y^x ", alain verghote
  • Re: "Help wanted , solutions to x^y = y^x ", The Ghost In The Machine
• (finite) coxeter group and bruhat order, Nicolas Richard
• compactification of cadlag path space, stochastic
  • Re: compactification of cadlag path space, bryant_j_j
  • Re: compactification of cadlag path space, stochastic
  • Re: compactification of cadlag path space, Dave Rusin
• Extending a result to more dimensions, Willem H. de Boer
  • Re: Extending a result to more dimensions, Robin Chapman
    • Re: Extending a result to more dimensions, Willem H. de Boer
• Isomorphic vector spaces, tristan . buckmaster
  • Re: Isomorphic vector spaces, Robin Chapman
    • Re: Isomorphic vector spaces, tristan . buckmaster
      • Re: Isomorphic vector spaces, tristan . buckmaster
      • Re: Isomorphic vector spaces, Robin Chapman
      • Re: Isomorphic vector spaces, tristan . buckmaster
      • Re: Isomorphic vector spaces, tristan . buckmaster
      • Re: Isomorphic vector spaces, Robin Chapman
      • Re: Isomorphic vector spaces, tristan . buckmaster
  • Re: Isomorphic vector spaces, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
• Maximum Volume with given Area &#8211; general, Narasimham G.L.
  • Re: Maximum Volume with given Area &#8211; general, Narasimham G.L.
• Re: Significance of Prime No in Cyclotomic Integers, Robin Chapman
• Re: tensors!, Robin Chapman
  • Re: tensors!, Tobin Fricke
  • Re: tensors!, Clifford J. Nelson
  • Re: tensors!, James Dolan
• problem 'getting into' the spirit of abstract algebra, porky_pig_jr@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: problem 'getting into' the spirit of abstract algebra, jimzotos
    • Re: problem 'getting into' the spirit of abstract algebra, Larry Hammick
    • Re: problem 'getting into' the spirit of abstract algebra, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
  • Re: problem 'getting into' the spirit of abstract algebra, Dave Rusin
    • Re: problem 'getting into' the spirit of abstract algebra, Angus Rodgers
      • Re: problem 'getting into' the spirit of abstract algebra, Dan Schmidt
  • Re: problem 'getting into' the spirit of abstract algebra, Larry Hammick
  • Re: problem 'getting into' the spirit of abstract algebra, Roligtroll
  • Re: problem 'getting into' the spirit of abstract algebra, Jim Spriggs
  • Re: problem 'getting into' the spirit of abstract algebra, stush
    • Re: problem 'getting into' the spirit of abstract algebra, stush
  • Re: problem 'getting into' the spirit of abstract algebra, porky_pig_jr@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: problem 'getting into' the spirit of abstract algebra, Herman Rubin
• Integrating e^x, Sailor Dude
  • Re: Integrating e^x, Stephen J. Herschkorn
  • Re: Integrating e^x, Phil Freedenberg
  • Re: Integrating e^x, Christian Claiborn
  • Re: Integrating e^x, Lynn Kurtz
• Vecchi's paper in Periodico di Matematica, Arthur Livingstone
  • Re: Vecchi's paper in Periodico di Matematica, Arthur Livingstone
  • Re: Vecchi's paper in Periodico di Matematica, Bill Dubuque
    • Re: Vecchi's paper in Periodico di Matematica, Arthur Livingstone
• Solving ODE, toeplight
• Brouwer fixed point theorem, nonton
  • Re: Brouwer fixed point theorem, Virgil
  • Re: Brouwer fixed point theorem, Per Vognsen
    • Re: Brouwer fixed point theorem, Per Vognsen
      • Re: Brouwer fixed point theorem, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Brouwer fixed point theorem, Per Vognsen
      • Re: Brouwer fixed point theorem, David C . Ullrich
• Re: Help with Linear programming, david
  • Re: Help with Linear programming, Randy Poe
• commutative ring, echo
  • Re: commutative ring, Daniel Alayon Solarz
    • Re: commutative ring, echo
      • Re: commutative ring, Roligtroll
      • Re: commutative ring, Roligtroll
      • Re: commutative ring, echo
      • Re: commutative ring, Roligtroll
      • Re: commutative rin