Re: Silly Factoring Theorems

rich burge wrote: 
So how could one go about proving e<P(k)?  One approach is to first
find some evidence that it is true: i.e. perform some experiments!
This is where "practicality matters".  Is it wise to start
experimenting with one of the RSA challenge numbers?  No, that's dumb,
and those who would offer such advise for this or any other sft are
themselves being silly (or cruel).

However, at times JSH states that he has "solved the factoring problem". By which he seems to mean that he has a fast way of factoring composites. In which case suggesting that he display the factors of one of the challenge numbers is not cruel or silly, merely the quickest way to prove us all wrong.

Mark Atherton
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: good SCOTUS decision
    ... Amendment in the first place if there isn't a bar on the evidence ... The Constitution may ban cruel and unusual ... Your "cruel and unusual punishment" and mine is a far wider bridge. ...
    (rec.sport.football.college)
  • Re: OT Dukakis: "Im responsible for the current mess"
    ... his right to be free from cruel and ... unusual punishments. ... you are talking theory and not practicality. ...
    (rec.music.classical.recordings)
  • I know you are all against me.
    ... Quite apart from the cruel and ... cutting things you say. ... Big evidence is that you all keep ...
    (comp.sys.mac.apps)
Quantcast