Re: "It is easy to see...."
- From: magidin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Arturo Magidin)
- Date: Wed, 4 May 2005 17:42:35 +0000 (UTC)
In article <1115225734.578032.86420@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
<agapito6314@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
><snip>
>>
>> I am assuming, of course, that you know that if 0<= f <= g, then
>>
>> I (g-f)du = I gdu - I fdu, but that may not be a given. I used to
>know
>> all this stuff cold, but it's been too many years...
>
>Actually I don't know. Is there a simple proof of this?
Since 0<= f <= g, then both g-f and f are nonnegative. So
I (g du) = I( (g-f) + f)du = I(g-f)du + I fdu.
Therefore, I(g-f)du = I (gdu) - I (fdu).
--
======================================================================
"It's not denial. I'm just very selective about
what I accept as reality."
--- Calvin ("Calvin and Hobbes")
======================================================================
Arturo Magidin
magidin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: "It is easy to see...."
- From: Randy Poe
- Re: "It is easy to see...."
- References:
- "It is easy to see...."
- From: agapito6314
- Re: "It is easy to see...."
- From: Arturo Magidin
- Re: "It is easy to see...."
- From: agapito6314
- "It is easy to see...."
- Prev by Date: Re: Question about Lebesque Integral
- Next by Date: Re: abundance of irrationals!)
- Previous by thread: Re: "It is easy to see...."
- Next by thread: Re: "It is easy to see...."
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|