Re: abundance of irrationals!)
- From: mueckenh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: 6 May 2005 14:14:19 -0700
Virgil wrote:
> >
> > This property means something like: An Em : n < m
> > but not Em An : n < m
>
> The axiom of infinity does not say that, however, one may deduce in a
> system with such an axiom, e.g., vonNeumann-Bernays-Goedel,
one may deduce many things if the day is long enough and if eventualy
the night is added. For instance that there is no infinity at all. THE
AXIOM of infinity says something similar to
An Em : n < m
and THAT AXIOM does not lead to Em An : n < m = aleph_0. Is that
correct?
Regards, WM
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: abundance of irrationals!)
- From: *** T. Winter
- Re: abundance of irrationals!)
- From: Virgil
- Re: abundance of irrationals!)
- References:
- Re: abundance of irrationals!)
- From: mueckenh
- Re: abundance of irrationals!)
- From: aeo6
- Re: abundance of irrationals!)
- From: Randy Poe
- Re: abundance of irrationals!)
- From: aeo6
- Re: abundance of irrationals!)
- From: Martin Shobe
- Re: abundance of irrationals!)
- From: aeo6
- Re: abundance of irrationals!)
- From: Martin Shobe
- Re: abundance of irrationals!)
- From: mueckenh
- Re: abundance of irrationals!)
- From: Virgil
- Re: abundance of irrationals!)
- Prev by Date: Re: abundance of irrationals!)
- Next by Date: Re: How to compute the inverse of Toeplitz Hermitian Matrix
- Previous by thread: Re: abundance of irrationals!)
- Next by thread: Re: abundance of irrationals!)
- Index(es):