Re: Problems I have with 1.999...=2

Randy, two statements, You hold true:
>Every member of the empty set is a number.
>There are no numbers which are elements of the empty set.
So, every element of the empty set is different from all numbers.
So speaking of elements of the empty set, is talking about elements,
which have a property and which have not this property
(A element empty set, follows A is number and A is not number).
By the way, that's why they call it empty.
So all elements of the empty set are living in an area outside logic,
as founded by Aristoteles arguments Now is proven to what area the
surreal numbers and the infinitesimals belong, isn't it ?
Hero.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Problems I have with 1.999...=2
    ... >>Every member of the empty set is a number. ... that the empty set is a proper subset of any other set? ... Prev by Date: ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Null Value In Set Theory
    ... On Jul 29, 2005 9:00PM, Brendan O'Sullivan wrote: ... > I'd always take the null component to be a member of ... >From what I have read about set theory there is only one empty set. ... Prev by Date: ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Empty family?
    ... > Remember: no element is a member of the empty set. ... "If x is Arturo, ... Prev by Date: ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Problems I have with 1.999...=2
    ... > Every member of the empty set is a number. ... that the empty set is a proper subset of any other set? ... Prev by Date: ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Null Value In Set Theory
    ... > is negative, since there's at least one set (namely, the empty set) ... > of which null is not a member. ... > Jose Carlos Santos ... Prev by Date: ...
    (sci.math)