Re: Problems I have with 1.999...=2

I accept Your logical statements, so accepting defeat.
But still i have objections to Your claim:
>Surreal numbers and infinitesimals are not outside standard logic(end
citation),
as Proginoskes is constructing them out of the property of the elements
of the empty set.
Regards
Hero

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: crank crank crank
    ... > Robinson's infinitesimals), as opposed to the ... But non-standard analysis is standard mathematics;-). ... of what they are meaning. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Another question regarding sources in FTM2006
    ... for citation page, citation text and footnote. ... GEDCOM standard which is applied with varying degrees of adherence by the ... various genealogy programs. ... When referenced by an individual or a family record, ...
    (soc.genealogy.britain)
  • Re: "LIKE" keyword in SQL queries
    ... "Kevin Spencer" wrote: ... Access also supports the standard, ... >> which I have generated a class Citation. ... >> title field) produces an immediate EOF condition with no records returned ...
    (microsoft.public.vsnet.general)
  • Re: crank crank crank
    ...  > Robinson's infinitesimals), as opposed to the ... This was pointed out by several posters. ... NSA is still "standard mathematics." ...
    (sci.math)
  • definitions ha
    ... Dik T Winter wrote: ... >>> Robinson's infinitesimals), as opposed to the ... And when they use standard terminology ... of what they are meaning. ...
    (sci.math)
Loading