Re: Problems I have with 1.999...=2
- From: Robin Chapman <rjc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 10:02:06 +0100
Hero wrote:
> Proginoskes is stating, that 0 is less than every element of {}.
And I say that 0 is bigger than all elements of {} !
--
Robin Chapman, www.maths.ex.ac.uk/~rjc/rjc.html
"Elegance is an algorithm"
Iain M. Banks, _The Algebraist_
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Problems I have with 1.999...=2
- From: Hero
- Re: Problems I have with 1.999...=2
- References:
- Problems I have with 1.999...=2
- From: Kirby Cook
- Re: Problems I have with 1.999...=2
- From: Proginoskes
- Re: Problems I have with 1.999...=2
- From: Hero
- Re: Problems I have with 1.999...=2
- From: Dave Seaman
- Re: Problems I have with 1.999...=2
- From: Hero
- Re: Problems I have with 1.999...=2
- From: Randy Poe
- Re: Problems I have with 1.999...=2
- From: Hero
- Re: Problems I have with 1.999...=2
- From: Dave Seaman
- Re: Problems I have with 1.999...=2
- From: Hero
- Re: Problems I have with 1.999...=2
- From: Dave Seaman
- Re: Problems I have with 1.999...=2
- From: Hero
- Problems I have with 1.999...=2
- Prev by Date: Re: Problems I have with 1.999...=2
- Next by Date: rings of integers
- Previous by thread: Re: Problems I have with 1.999...=2
- Next by thread: Re: Problems I have with 1.999...=2
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
