Re: Help in answering news story on refutation of fermat's last theorem

In article <vcb3bst63kv.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Torkel Franzen <torkel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>"Mark Nudelman" <markn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> I wonder what he thinks it means for an axiom to be "false". Axioms can be
>> inconsistent, but how can they be false?
>
> The same way any other statement can be false. If you take as an
>axiom "0=1", you have a false axiom.

You can't have a ring with only one element?


.