Re: Help in answering news story on refutation of fermat's last theorem
- From: Torkel Franzen <torkel@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 12 May 2005 15:52:53 +0200
"Chip Eastham" <hardmath@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> In mathematical logic it would indeed be odd to speak of false axioms
> without reference to a specific interpretation, though of course such a
> reference could be implied by context.
Not just in mathematical logic, but in any context. As I said, in
speaking of sentences as true or false, we presuppose some
interpretation. In particular, when we speak of Goldbach's conjecture,
"T is consistent", and so on, as true or false, we presuppose
the ordinary interpretation of these statements.
> This approach to defining truth in terms of satisfiability (and thus in
> model-relative terms) is due to Tarski, who also proved that truth in
> absolute terms is mathematically undefinable.
Tarski proved nothing of the kind.
.
- References:
- Re: Help in answering news story on refutation of fermat's last theorem
- From: Torkel Franzen
- Re: Help in answering news story on refutation of fermat's last theorem
- From: Mark Nudelman
- Re: Help in answering news story on refutation of fermat's last theorem
- From: Torkel Franzen
- Re: Help in answering news story on refutation of fermat's last theorem
- From:
- Re: Help in answering news story on refutation of fermat's last theorem
- From: Torkel Franzen
- Re: Help in answering news story on refutation of fermat's last theorem
- From: Chip Eastham
- Re: Help in answering news story on refutation of fermat's last theorem
- Prev by Date: Re: [JSH] RSA-200 factored
- Next by Date: Re: Convergence of Newton's method for finding a root of a polynomial
- Previous by thread: Re: Help in answering news story on refutation of fermat's last theorem
- Next by thread: Re: Help in answering news story on refutation of fermat's last theorem
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|