Re: Sets of measure 0 question...
- From: José Carlos Santos <jcsantos@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 08:14:13 +0100
William Elliot wrote:
What you wrote makes no sense to me. Each one of my A_n's is a set of intervals of R. So, what do you mean by sum_j |A_j|?
sum(j=1,oo) |Aj| [Aj] typo for |Aj|
No progress here. I had no doubt that sum_j meant sum(j = 1,oo). My question is: what is |A_j|? After all, A_j is a set of intervals of R.
IIRC, |A_j| is the length of the interval.
For the *fourth* time already: A_j is *not* an interval; it's a set of intervals! So, what do you mean by |A_j|?
Best regards,
Jose Carlos Santos .
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Sets of measure 0 question...
- From: William Elliot
- Re: Sets of measure 0 question...
- References:
- Sets of measure 0 question...
- From: James
- Re: Sets of measure 0 question...
- From: José Carlos Santos
- Re: Sets of measure 0 question...
- From: William Elliot
- Re: Sets of measure 0 question...
- From: José Carlos Santos
- Re: Sets of measure 0 question...
- From: William Elliot
- Re: Sets of measure 0 question...
- From: José Carlos Santos
- Re: Sets of measure 0 question...
- From: William Elliot
- Sets of measure 0 question...
- Prev by Date: Re: Problems I have with 1.999...=2
- Next by Date: Euclidean Steiner Problem w/ duality
- Previous by thread: Re: Sets of measure 0 question...
- Next by thread: Re: Sets of measure 0 question...
- Index(es):