Re: Twin Primes Conjecture
- From: Dave Seaman <dseaman@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 18:24:56 +0000 (UTC)
On Wed, 18 May 2005 18:07:36 +0000 (UTC), Keith A. Lewis wrote:
> rusin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Dave Rusin) writes in article <d6ftfq$smj$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> dated 18 May 2005 17:19:54 GMT:
>>In article <20400835.1116426387524.JavaMail.jakarta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
>>Kamalu <kamalu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>>Yes, I agree with you it is nonsense, if and only if you can prove
>>>that primes do NOT occur randomly within interval [x,2x]. To my
>>>knowledge nobody has ever proved or disproved the randomness of the
>>>primes. If you know otherwise, enlighten us!
>>
>>Let's try x=10^6. There are 606028 primes in [x, 2x].
> There are only 500000 odd numbers in the range [1e6, 2e6], so there couldn't
> possible be 606028 primes. Maybe you're using a different range?
There are 606028 primes in [1e7, 2e7].
--
Dave Seaman
Judge Yohn's mistakes revealed in Mumia Abu-Jamal ruling.
<http://www.commoncouragepress.com/index.cfm?action=book&bookid=228>
.
- References:
- Re: Twin Primes Conjecture
- From: Christian Bau
- Re: Twin Primes Conjecture
- From: Kamalu
- Re: Twin Primes Conjecture
- From: Dave Rusin
- Re: Twin Primes Conjecture
- From: Keith A. Lewis
- Re: Twin Primes Conjecture
- Prev by Date: Re: On normed vector spaces
- Next by Date: Re: On normed vector spaces
- Previous by thread: Re: Twin Primes Conjecture
- Next by thread: Re: Twin Primes Conjecture
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
