Re: Mueckenheim sighting

In article <3f0v3tF5em2mU1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Marc Olschok <sa796ol@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> *** T. Winter <***.Winter@xxxxxx> wrote:
> > In article <d6e1pr$dli$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> lrudolph@xxxxxxxxx (Lee Rudolph) writes:
> > > In Andrei Khrennikov's book, _Non-Archimedan Analysis:
....
> > > discussions (sometimes quite critical) on the foundations
> > > of the theory of probability and non-Kolmogorv probabilistic
> > > models with p-adic probabilities."
> >
> > I do not think that is the same. If you look at his webpage of
> > publications
> > (http://www.fh-augsburg.de/~mueckenh/Bilder/Ver%F6ffentlichungen.htm) you
> > will find that all his publications until 1994 are physics only.[...]
>
> Why should Physicists not work in probability?

Oh, they do. But p-adic probability? Perhaps it is the same (one of his
publications is even in the references). I would like to know whether
WM agrees with the contents of the book.
--
*** t. winter, cwi, kruislaan 413, 1098 sj amsterdam, nederland, +31205924131
home: bovenover 215, 1025 jn amsterdam, nederland; http://www.cwi.nl/~***/
.

Quantcast