Re: WHAT THE MODERN MATHEMATHICIEN ARE SHY TO TALK ABOUT

Well.IT is my mistake .I should had said that it is only a OUTLINE
of the elementary proof of FLT,as Fermat did in his notes about
the proof Of FLT for n=4
george ghiata



> > About my presntation I want to say that all
> statements are correct.
>
> Are we supposed to take your word for it?
>
> >If you take a pen and go from statement to statement
> you may be able
> to
> >find what connects each other.
>
> Yes. May be able. And may be unable. Let's face it:
> you are too smart
> for us.What's trivial to you is incomprehensible to
> us.
>
> Why don't you humor us, stupid mathematicians, and do
> what we,
> mathematicians, do: make presentations of our proofs
> comprehensible to
> others, so that they wouldn't have to "go from
> statement to statement"
> in the hope that they "may be able to find what
> connects each other'.
>
> > It is a concise proof and the links between steps
> are not shown but
> can be deduce. ??
>
> Well, maybe instead of posting tons of unhelpful
> posts, you could
> instead take a couple of hours and make your "proof"
> less "concise".
>
> But you don't even bother with re-reading the typos
> that you make.
> Like:
>
> >Therfore k=1 must be disible at least by 4
>
.