Re: prove it measurable
- From: José Carlos Santos <jcsantos@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 22:41:38 +0100
A N Niel wrote:
He said R^n, now you say [n,n+1], a bit confusing perhaps...
Oops, quite right. I did not notice that. Of course, the method that I described also applies to R^n.
Best regards,
Jose Carlos Santos .
- References:
- prove it measurable
- From: Li Yi
- Re: prove it measurable
- From: José Carlos Santos
- Re: prove it measurable
- From: A N Niel
- prove it measurable
- Prev by Date: Re: WHAT THE MODERN MATHEMATHICIEN ARE SHY TO TALK ABOUT
- Next by Date: Re: Trisecting and angle after infinite steps
- Previous by thread: Re: prove it measurable
- Next by thread: multiple sums
- Index(es):
