Re: Sum of k relative primes
- From: klewis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Keith A. Lewis)
- Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 17:02:02 +0000 (UTC)
Toni Lassila <toni@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes in article <cvur811a85ghcvhk2jgdogodhitrebjlrd@xxxxxxx> dated Fri, 20 May 2005 18:06:33 +0300:
>Prove or disprove:
>
>For each k >= 2, there exists N_k s.t. for all integers n > N_k there
>exist integers a_1 + ... + a_k = n, a_j >= 2 for all j=1,...k, and
>GCD(a_1,...,a_k) = 1.
For k=2, try this: Choose a_1 < n such that it is some power of a prime
number which does not divide n.
--Keith Lewis klewis {at} mitre.org
The above may not (yet) represent the opinions of my employer.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Sum of k relative primes
- From: Robert Israel
- Re: Sum of k relative primes
- References:
- Sum of k relative primes
- From: Toni Lassila
- Sum of k relative primes
- Prev by Date: a probability density function & DWT
- Next by Date: Re: a question for the anti-Cantorians
- Previous by thread: Sum of k relative primes
- Next by thread: Re: Sum of k relative primes
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|