Re: 'Navie set theory': why when S(x) is (x = x), the specified x's do not constitue a set?

From: "porky_pig_jr@xxxxxxxxxxx" <porky_pig_jr@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 21 May 2005 14:41:04 -0700

I'm using Latex notation which is fairly common in this group. If you
can't understand it, then don't bother to reply. Just don't make an
*** of yourself.

.

References:
- 'Navie set theory': why when S(x) is (x = x), the specified x's do not constitue a set?
  - From: porky_pig_jr@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: 'Navie set theory': why when S(x) is (x = x), the specified x's do not constitue a set?
  - From: William Elliot

Prev by Date: Re: 'Navie set theory': why when S(x) is (x = x), the specified x's do not constitue a set?
Next by Date: Re: Calculating slope of roof: What is the arc-sine of (4/12) ?!
Previous by thread: Re: 'Navie set theory': why when S(x) is (x = x), the specified x's do not constitue a set?
Next by thread: Re: 'Navie set theory': why when S(x) is (x = x), the specified x's do not constitue a set?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread