Re: Will NIST fix their tables?

From: Robin Chapman <rjc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 22 May 2005 10:26:21 +0100

Garry Denke wrote:

> Robin Chapman wrote:
>> Garry Denke wrote:
>>
>> > Einstein's nine (9) primary fundamental universal base unit values
>>
>> <snip>
>>
>> Off-topic, physics not mathematics.
>>
>> --
>> Robin Chapman, www.maths.ex.ac.uk/~rjc/rjc.html
>> "Elegance is an algorithm"
>> Iain M. Banks, _The Algebraist_
>
> Tell that to NIST because that's the point Robin.

Still off-topic Mr Dense, NIST aren't spamming this group with
physics trash: you are.

--
Robin Chapman, www.maths.ex.ac.uk/~rjc/rjc.html
"Elegance is an algorithm"
Iain M. Banks, _The Algebraist_
.

References:
- Re: Will NIST fix their tables?
  - From: Robin Chapman

Prev by Date: A Poker Problem (Heads Up)
Next by Date: Re: existence of solution to x = f(x) = g(x) ?
Previous by thread: Re: Will NIST fix their tables?
Next by thread: One optimal question
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread