Re: Cantor's Theory sucks

From: Robert Kolker <nowhere@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 16:53:27 -0400

Tony Orlow (aeo6) wrote:

No they just suffer their own dry axiomatic approach to life and their little symbols and proofs without regard to reality.

It is good enough to ground physics which has produced the computer with which you spew all over UseNet. All that unreality is able to navagate a space craft around the Solar System.

Bob Kolker

References:
- Cantor's Theory sucks
  - From: david petry
- Re: Cantor's Theory sucks
  - From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: Cantor's Theory sucks
  - From: david petry
- Re: Cantor's Theory sucks
  - From: anzaurres1
- Re: Cantor's Theory sucks
  - From: aeo6
- Re: Cantor's Theory sucks
  - From: anzaurres1
- Re: Cantor's Theory sucks
  - From: Proginoskes
- Re: Cantor's Theory sucks
  - From: anzaurres1
- Re: Cantor's Theory sucks
  - From: aeo6
- Re: Cantor's Theory sucks
  - From: anzaurres1
- Re: Cantor's Theory sucks
  - From: aeo6
- Re: Cantor's Theory sucks
  - From: anzaurres1
- Re: Cantor's Theory sucks
  - From: aeo6
- Re: Cantor's Theory sucks
  - From: anzaurres1
- Re: Cantor's Theory sucks
  - From: aeo6
- Re: Cantor's Theory sucks
  - From: Robert Kolker
- Re: Cantor's Theory sucks
  - From: aeo6

Prev by Date: Re: Cantor and the binary tree
Next by Date: Re: Can someone answer this simple question for me?
Previous by thread: Re: Cantor's Theory sucks
Next by thread: Re: Cantor's Theory sucks
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread