Re: CANTOR's theorem

In article <1116957036.030359.110960@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
mueckenh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

> Say, there is no set {M, m, f} where f is a mapping, M is the set of
> all nongenerators under f, and m is a generator which is not a
> generator.

Whatever sort of beastie is a generator which is not a generator?
.

Quantcast