Re: an ideal problem
- From: magidin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Arturo Magidin)
- Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 17:08:47 +0000 (UTC)
In article <Pine.BSI.4.58.0505250337200.25022@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
William Elliot <marsh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>On Wed, 25 May 2005, Per Vognsen wrote:
>
>> Li Yi wrote:
>> > I and J are ideals of a ring R such that I + J = R.
>> >
>> > (A ring here is assumed to have commutativity and multiplicative
>> > identity)
>> >
>> > Show that I /\ J = IJ.
>>
>> The inclusion IJ sub I cap J is trivial and does not require the
>> hypothesis.
>>
>If x in IJ, some a in I, b in J with x = ab
> ab in I, ab in J, ab in I /\ J
This is incorrect. The best you can say is that
x = i_1j_1 + ... + i_kj_k
for some nonnegative integer k, i_r in I, j_r in J.
--
======================================================================
"It's not denial. I'm just very selective about
what I accept as reality."
--- Calvin ("Calvin and Hobbes")
======================================================================
Arturo Magidin
magidin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: an ideal problem
- From: William Elliot
- Re: an ideal problem
- References:
- an ideal problem
- From: Li Yi
- Re: an ideal problem
- From: Per Vognsen
- Re: an ideal problem
- From: William Elliot
- an ideal problem
- Prev by Date: Re: Cantor and the binary tree
- Next by Date: Re: Cantor and the binary tree
- Previous by thread: Re: an ideal problem
- Next by thread: Re: an ideal problem
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|