Re: Cantor and the binary tree
- From: Tony Orlow (aeo6) <aeo6@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 14:33:54 -0400
Robert Kolker said:
> Virgil wrote:
> >
> >
> > That "number" does not have to BECOME 1/3, it already is 1/3.
>
> The temporal fallacy is one of the biggest imediments to understanding
> limits.
>
> Bob Kolker
>
>
It wasn't long ago that I heard Cantorians talking about iterations happening
in finite vs. infinite "time". It's just a metaphor for measure in general.
--
Smiles,
Tony
.
- References:
- Cantor and the binary tree
- From: mueckenh
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree
- From: *** T. Winter
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree
- From: mueckenh
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree
- From: Virgil
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree
- From: Robert Kolker
- Cantor and the binary tree
- Prev by Date: Re: Cantor and the binary tree
- Next by Date: Re: L^1, L^2 convergence
- Previous by thread: Re: Cantor and the binary tree
- Next by thread: Re: Cantor and the binary tree
- Index(es):