Re: a question for the anti-Cantorians
- From: "*** T. Winter" <***.Winter@xxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 00:26:09 GMT
In article <1117056608.711539.275850@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> "Randy Poe" <poespam-trap@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> *** T. Winter wrote:
....
> > Note: lim{n -> oo} |{s in P, s <= n}| / |{t in N, t <= n}| does not exist.
>
> Just bumping this thread. Tony seems to have walked
> away from it.
Yup, I reposted in a thread he is currently reading. Perhaps he will
answer that one. Strange however that he strongly supports Eckard
Blumschein and Wolfgang Mueckenheim, while I am pretty sure they will
not support him at all.
--
*** t. winter, cwi, kruislaan 413, 1098 sj amsterdam, nederland, +31205924131
home: bovenover 215, 1025 jn amsterdam, nederland; http://www.cwi.nl/~***/
.
- References:
- Re: a question for the anti-Cantorians
- From: aeo6
- Re: a question for the anti-Cantorians
- From: Randy Poe
- Re: a question for the anti-Cantorians
- Prev by Date: Re: OT: An observation
- Next by Date: Re: Any tricks to get variance of continuous data?
- Previous by thread: Re: a question for the anti-Cantorians
- Next by thread: Re: a question for the anti-Cantorians
- Index(es):