Re: Cantor and the binary tree
- From: Robert Kolker <nowhere@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 11:12:17 -0400
Tony Orlow (aeo6) wrote:
And which you have conveniently dispensed with for the sake of your argument. Typical Cantorian prestadigitation.
Those are end points of finite pathes.
In the set of all countable sequences of 0 an 1 there are no end points.
Pretty soon you will tell me there is only a finite set of finite integers. Can you see the mistake in that?
Bob Kolker
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree
- From: aeo6
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree
- References:
- Cantor and the binary tree
- From: mueckenh
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree
- From: Robert Kolker
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree
- From: Robin Chapman
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree
- From: Ron Sperber
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree
- From: aeo6
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree
- From: Robert Kolker
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree
- From: aeo6
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree
- From: Robert Kolker
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree
- From: mueckenh
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree
- From: Virgil
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree
- From: aeo6
- Cantor and the binary tree
- Prev by Date: Re: Help (polynomial)
- Next by Date: Re: Cantor and the binary tree
- Previous by thread: Re: Cantor and the binary tree
- Next by thread: Re: Cantor and the binary tree
- Index(es):