Re: Cantor and the binary tree
- From: Virgil <ITSnetNOTcom#virgil@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 10:39:18 -0600
In article <MPG.1cff9fda6b659940989d2e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Tony Orlow (aeo6) <aeo6@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > All unending paths in an unending binary tree contain infinitely many
> > nodes.
> Most of which are infinitely far from the root.
Then how do they connect to the root node? In a path you must have each
node linked by one branch to a next node, which means that the number of
links connecting any two nodes in a path is finite.
TO is still suffering from the delusion that adding 1 to a finite number
can produce a non-finite number.
He keeps fantasizing about these allegedly infinite numbers produced by
finite processes, but cannot explain which finite step produces an
infinite result.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree
- From: aeo6
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree
- From: imaginatorium
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree
- References:
- Cantor and the binary tree
- From: mueckenh
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree
- From: Robert Kolker
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree
- From: Robin Chapman
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree
- From: Ron Sperber
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree
- From: aeo6
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree
- From: Robert Kolker
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree
- From: aeo6
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree
- From: Robert Kolker
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree
- From: mueckenh
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree
- From: Virgil
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree
- From: aeo6
- Cantor and the binary tree
- Prev by Date: Re: Help (polynomial)
- Next by Date: Re: L^1, L^2 convergence
- Previous by thread: Re: Cantor and the binary tree
- Next by thread: Re: Cantor and the binary tree
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|