Re: Cantor and the binary tree

Robert Kolker said:
> Tony Orlow (aeo6) wrote:
>
> >
> > And which you have conveniently dispensed with for the sake of your argument.
> > Typical Cantorian prestadigitation.
>
> Those are end points of finite pathes.
>
> In the set of all countable sequences of 0 an 1 there are no end points.
>
> Pretty soon you will tell me there is only a finite set of finite
> integers. Can you see the mistake in that?
>
> Bob Kolker
>
>
I have already said that many times. No, I see the mistake in the alternative.

BTW - you snipped context so I won't respond to the first part, since I am not
going searching for it.
--
Smiles,

Tony
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Cantor and the binary tree
    ... Robert Kolker said: ... > Tony Orlow wrote: ... >> little axiom cave whenever questioned. ... > mathematics on which physics is based, which in turn has produced the ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: a question for the anti-Cantorians
    ... Robert Kolker said: ... > Tony Orlow wrote: ... Some assumed truths ... to resolve contradiction as we go along, by placing concepts within an ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: abundance of irrationals!)
    ... Robert Kolker said: ... > Tony Orlow wrote: ... >> Well, by everyone's need to make the naturals a set of finite numbers, and my ... Yes Bob I've heard that before about a million times. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Cantor and the binary tree
    ... Robert Kolker said: ... > Tony Orlow wrote: ... >> mapping functions and then disregarding them at infinity. ... > Bob Kolker ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Cantors Theory sucks
    ... Robert Kolker said: ... > Tony Orlow wrote: ... > nourished by the real world, but mathematics -as such- as no emprical ... math is an abstraction from reality. ...
    (sci.math)
Quantcast