Re: Help in answering news story on refutation of fermat's last theorem

anzaurres1@xxxxxxxxxxx writes:

>> This is utterly beside the point. I did not complain about your
>> original statement. I explained Torkel's complaint.
>
> The problem here is that I suspect that, if you are indeed a trained
> mathematician, you must have totally misunderstood the meaning of the
> discussion between Mark Nudelman, Dave Rusin and me on the one side and
> Torkel Franzen on the other side.

I don't give a *** about what you suspect. You used a phrase and
Torkel objected. You expressed surprise and disdain. I explained his
objection.

You raised a hissy fit.

You are the thinnest-skinned self-proclaimed mathematician I have
encountered.

> You know what Torkel was actually complaining about in this thread?
> Great. Explain it to me.

I did. You whined because I used derogatory terms like "non-standard"
and "confused".

If you really insist on remaining in confusion, I surely won't try and
stop you.

--
What you want with a hen? What you want with a woman
Won't cackle when she lays when she won't do nothin' I say?
What you want with a hen? -- Charlie Patton,
Won't cackle when she lays "Banty Rooster Blues"

.

Quantcast