Re: Cantor and the binary tree



Alan Morgan wrote:

>
> When WM was talking about adding a node being the same as adding a path
> he was, although he didn't know it, talking about *finite* paths.

Sorry, I must correct you. I am talking about an infinite tree. It's
mere interest to find out how the paths and nodes were generated at the
time of creating the tree.

So I am selecting some node by chance and see that one ath goes in
whereas two pats come out. So, I dare to conclude, that this node
contributes to the elemens of this infinite tree exactly one path and
one node. And this happens for every node I looked at (up to now. There
is a chance that this siuation may change. But I consider it very
small).

Regards, WM

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Cantor Confusion
    ... > many in the infinite tree. ... Without the chance that uncountably many are separated in the whole ... > does not fit my original statement: ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Another set with cardinality |Z|
    ... >> paths than vertices in this infinite tree? ... can't see a leakage here, but if you do, please tell me. ... save your condescending tone for somewhere else. ... Regards, ...
    (sci.math)