Re: Cantor and the binary tree
- From: "*** T. Winter" <***.Winter@xxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 30 May 2005 14:01:43 GMT
In article <1117447786.595884.129140@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> mueckenh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
....
> No. It is corresponds to that node where it turns right for the last
> time. For numbers like 1/3 we cannot know which node that is.
Right, Because there is no such node.
> But we
> are investigating whether there are as many nodes as path. For hat
> purpose it doesn't matter if we know which path corresponds to which
> node, but we need only to know that eery path crresponds to a node.
But we know it does not, 1/3 corresponds to a path, but not to a node.
--
*** t. winter, cwi, kruislaan 413, 1098 sj amsterdam, nederland, +31205924131
home: bovenover 215, 1025 jn amsterdam, nederland; http://www.cwi.nl/~***/
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree
- From: mueckenh
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree
- References:
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree
- From: mueckenh
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree
- From: Virgil
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree
- From: mueckenh
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree
- Prev by Date: Re: Cantor and the binary tree
- Next by Date: Re: CANTOR's theorem
- Previous by thread: Re: Cantor and the binary tree
- Next by thread: Re: Cantor and the binary tree
- Index(es):