Re: Why is there no *really* useful Algebra beyond complex numbers?
- From: A N Niel <anniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 10:08:30 -0400
In article <d7hqci$i16$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Anton Suchaneck
<asuchaneck@xxxxxx> wrote:
> Does anyone know *the* reason, why for example quaternions and other algebra
> are not as mighty as complex numbers?
>
> Is there no way to extend complex number to be even more useful? :)
>
> Anton
Some people think matrices are useful.
.
- References:
- Why is there no *really* useful Algebra beyond complex numbers?
- From: Anton Suchaneck
- Why is there no *really* useful Algebra beyond complex numbers?
- Prev by Date: Re: Orlow cardinality question
- Next by Date: Re: Orlow cardinality question
- Previous by thread: Why is there no *really* useful Algebra beyond complex numbers?
- Next by thread: Re: Why is there no *really* useful Algebra beyond complex numbers?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|