Why is there no *really* useful Algebra beyond complex numbers?
- From: Anton Suchaneck <asuchaneck@xxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 15:55:29 +0200
Does anyone know *the* reason, why for example quaternions and other algebra
are not as mighty as complex numbers?
Is there no way to extend complex number to be even more useful? :)
Anton
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why is there no *really* useful Algebra beyond complex numbers?
- From: Owen
- Re: Why is there no *really* useful Algebra beyond complex numbers?
- From: abe . buckingham
- Re: Why is there no *really* useful Algebra beyond complex numbers?
- From: Jim Spriggs
- Re: Why is there no *really* useful Algebra beyond complex numbers?
- From: gowan4@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Why is there no *really* useful Algebra beyond complex numbers?
- From: Alex Hunsley
- Re: Why is there no *really* useful Algebra beyond complex numbers?
- From: A N Niel
- Re: Why is there no *really* useful Algebra beyond complex numbers?
- Prev by Date: Re: Orlow cardinality question
- Next by Date: Re: Orlow cardinality question
- Previous by thread: Generalising the symmetry of second derivatives
- Next by thread: Re: Why is there no *really* useful Algebra beyond complex numbers?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
