Re: Why is there no *really* useful Algebra beyond complex numbers?
- From: Anton Suchaneck <asuchaneck@xxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 16:35:05 +0200
> See the recent book "On Quaternions and
> Octonions" by Conway and Smith for more information. There have been
> articles by John Baez discussing physical applications, too.
Sounds interesting. I hope those applications are not to far from practical
applications.
How can I find the articles by John Baez?
Anton
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why is there no *really* useful Algebra beyond complex numbers?
- From: gowan4@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Why is there no *really* useful Algebra beyond complex numbers?
- From: czli
- Re: Why is there no *really* useful Algebra beyond complex numbers?
- From: Jim Spriggs
- Re: Why is there no *really* useful Algebra beyond complex numbers?
- References:
- Why is there no *really* useful Algebra beyond complex numbers?
- From: Anton Suchaneck
- Re: Why is there no *really* useful Algebra beyond complex numbers?
- From: gowan4@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Why is there no *really* useful Algebra beyond complex numbers?
- Prev by Date: Re: Cantor and the binary tree
- Next by Date: Re: Cantor and the binary tree
- Previous by thread: Re: Why is there no *really* useful Algebra beyond complex numbers?
- Next by thread: Re: Why is there no *really* useful Algebra beyond complex numbers?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|