sci.math

• Date Index

---

• TO MR>ANDREW WILES:FIND THE 3d ELEMENTARY PROOF OF FLT>, george ghiata
• elementary number theory result, James Pirk
  • Re: elementary number theory result, Robert Israel
• coin problem, doki_pen
  • Re: coin problem, Arturo Magidin
  • Re: coin problem, Devan L
  • Re: coin problem, doki_pen
    • Re: coin problem, Arturo Magidin
  • Re: coin problem, doki_pen
    • Re: coin problem, doki_pen
      • Re: coin problem, bischar
  • Re: coin problem, bischar
• Natural numbers and decimal parts, bischar
  • Re: Natural numbers and decimal parts, bischar
  • Re: Natural numbers and decimal parts, jj
  • Re: Natural numbers and decimal parts, Pubkeybreaker
    • Re: Natural numbers and decimal parts, bischar
• space filling?, Puppet_Sock
• Re: Bryce Adair Walker - April 19th 1980, bischar
• Trivial tangent bundles, Maury Barbato
• Tangent bundles, Maury Barbato
  • Re: Tangent bundles, Lee Rudolph
    • Re: Tangent bundles, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Tangent bundles, Lee Rudolph
      • Re: Tangent bundles, W. Dale Hall
  • Re: Tangent bundles, Maury Barbato
• Re: Question about generalized union, A N Niel
• Complex analysis question - cauchy's theorem for a rectangle, koundinya.k@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Complex analysis question - cauchy's theorem for a rectangle, The World Wide Wade
  • Re: Complex analysis question - cauchy's theorem for a rectangle, Jiri Lebl
    • Re: Complex analysis question - cauchy's theorem for a rectangle, bobovski
• Transcendent?, Tony
  • Re: Transcendent?, Torkel Franzen
    • Re: Transcendent?, Jean-Claude Arbaut
      • Re: Transcendent?, Torkel Franzen
    • Re: Transcendent?, Hero
  • Re: Transcendent?, David C . Ullrich
• Easy Inequality, Dejeune
  • Re: Easy Inequality, The Qurqirish Dragon
    • Re: Easy Inequality, David C . Ullrich
  • Re: Easy Inequality, David C . Ullrich
• [JSH] Surrogate factoring is over... for the third time, José Carlos Santos
  • Re: Surrogate factoring is over... for the third time, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Divisibility Properties, charlotte davidson
• A field was field!, tontoko
• Re: Question on a proof #2, OnlyRH
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Question on a proof #2, OnlyRH
• Re: John Thomas Walton - October 8th 1946, bischar
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: John Thomas Walton - October 8th 1946, bischar
  • Re: John Thomas Walton - October 8th 1946, bischar
  • Re: John Thomas Walton - October 8th 1946, bischar
• online journal math.e, no.5, duje
• Topology help: locally compact refinement, Meg Weiss
  • Re: Topology help: locally compact refinement, José Carlos Santos
• proving an infinite series is divergent, Amanda
  • Re: proving an infinite series is divergent, A N Niel
    • Re: proving an infinite series is divergent, The World Wide Wade
  • Re: proving an infinite series is divergent, The World Wide Wade
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • proving an infinite series is divergent, Amanda
    • Re: proving an infinite series is divergent, Daniel Grubb
• Parallel conjungate gradient method for linear system from FEM method for elastic problems, Jiri Dobes
• Halmos proof question, agapito6314
  • Re: Halmos proof question, Justin Young
  • Re: Halmos proof question, Jean-Claude Arbaut
  • Re: Halmos proof question, David C . Ullrich
  • Re: Halmos proof question, Amicus
  • Re: Halmos proof question, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
• Question on a proof, OnlyRH
  • Re: Question on a proof, Justin Young
  • Re: Question on a proof, José Carlos Santos
  • Re: Question on a proof, OnlyRH
• Hurray for Kronecker, Tony
  • Re: Hurray for Kronecker, José Carlos Santos
    • Re: Hurray for Kronecker, fernando revilla
  • Re: Hurray for Kronecker, Jean-Claude Arbaut
    • Re: Hurray for Kronecker, Hero
    • Re: Hurray for Kronecker, david petry
  • Re: Hurray for Kronecker, David C . Ullrich
  • Re: Hurray for Kronecker, Jim Spriggs
• Prgramming Contest: Geometry/Maps/Shapes, hicinbothem
• A property of the Fibonacci series?, Michael
  • Re: A property of the Fibonacci series?, Jean-Claude Arbaut
  • Re: A property of the Fibonacci series?, José Carlos Santos
  • Re: A property of the Fibonacci series?, Michael
    • Re: A property of the Fibonacci series?, achava
      • Re: A property of the Fibonacci series?, Jean-Claude Arbaut
    • Re: A property of the Fibonacci series?, Dana
    • Re: A property of the Fibonacci series?, Mitch Harris
• Pytagorean Theorem, Norleif Slettebų
  • Re: Pytagorean Theorem, Ann Chance
    • Re: Pytagorean Theorem, Norleif Slettebų
  • Re: Pytagorean Theorem, Pubkeybreaker
    • Re: Pytagorean Theorem, Norleif Slettebų
  • Re: Pytagorean Theorem, Jean-Claude Arbaut
  • Re: Pytagorean Theorem, Tony
    • Re: Pytagorean Theorem, Dave Rusin
• Quadratic solution, Big Show
• Prime Number Checker?, zanziba
  • Re: Prime Number Checker?, Pubkeybreaker
    • Re: Prime Number Checker?, zanziba
      • Re: Prime Number Checker?, Pubkeybreaker
• Complex analysis question., koundinya.k@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Complex analysis question., José Carlos Santos
  • Re: Complex analysis question., David C . Ullrich
  • Re: Complex analysis question.-, JEMebius
    • Re: Complex analysis question.-, koundinya.k@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Complex analysis question.-, koundinya.k@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Plus/minus square roots?, Tony
• A question in point set topology, kishore
  • Re: A question in point set topology, José Carlos Santos
  • Re: A question in point set topology, William Elliot
  • Re: A question in point set topology, David C . Ullrich
  • Re: A question in point set topology, Dave Rusin
    • Re: A question in point set topology, William Elliot
• simplify expr. involving sinh and arcsinh, S. Badel
  • Re: simplify expr. involving sinh and arcsinh, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
    • Re: simplify expr. involving sinh and arcsinh, Robert Israel
      • Re: simplify expr. involving sinh and arcsinh, alainverghote
      • Re: simplify expr. involving sinh and arcsinh, Jean-Claude Arbaut
      • Re: simplify expr. involving sinh and arcsinh, Robert Israel
      • Re: simplify expr. involving sinh and arcsinh, Jean-Claude Arbaut
      • Re: simplify expr. involving sinh and arcsinh, G. A. Edgar
• " Is this operator involutive ? , wanted confirmation .", alainverghote
  • Re: " Is this operator involutive ? , wanted confirmation .", A N Niel
    • Re: " Is this operator involutive ? , wanted confirmation .", alainverghote
• Analysis of step response via numerica laplace transform?, otto . kierkegaard
• Infinite Factorial & Regularization, Narcoleptic Insomniac
  • Re: Infinite Factorial & Regularization, bryant_j_j
    • Re: Infinite Factorial & Regularization, Narcoleptic Insomniac
      • Re: Infinite Factorial & Regularization, bryant_j_j
      • Re: Infinite Factorial & Regularization, Robert Israel
      • Re: Infinite Factorial & Regularization, Narcoleptic Insomniac
      • Re: Infinite Factorial & Regularization, Robert Israel
    • Re: Infinite Factorial & Regularization, M.J.T. Guy
      • Re: Infinite Factorial & Regularization, bryant_j_j
      • Re: Infinite Factorial & Regularization, Jean-Claude Arbaut
      • Re: Infinite Factorial & Regularization, Narcoleptic Insomniac
• Question about DE, carlos5100
  • Re: Question about DE, Gerry Myerson
• A question about Glivenko-Cantelli lemma, QQ
  • Re: A question about Glivenko-Cantelli lemma, Stephen J. Herschkorn
    • Re: A question about Glivenko-Cantelli lemma, QQ
      • Re: A question about Glivenko-Cantelli lemma, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: A question about Glivenko-Cantelli lemma, QQ
      • Re: A question about Glivenko-Cantelli lemma, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: A question about Glivenko-Cantelli lemma, Herman Rubin
      • Re: A question about Glivenko-Cantelli lemma, Stephen J. Herschkorn
      • Re: A question about Glivenko-Cantelli lemma, Robert Israel
  • Re: A question about Glivenko-Cantelli lemma, Herman Rubin
  • Re: A question about Glivenko-Cantelli lemma, ArtflDodgr
• intermediate value theorem for the lattices?, mikharakiri_nospaum
  • Re: intermediate value theorem for the lattices?, mikharakiri_nospaum
  • Re: intermediate value theorem for the lattices?, Zdislav V. Kovarik
• cranky challenge - beating a game, \"Gary Z.\"
  • Re: cranky challenge - beating a game, Jean-Claude Arbaut
    • Re: cranky challenge - beating a game, gangxu_csu
    • Re: cranky challenge - beating a game, gangxu_csu
    • Re: cranky challenge - beating a game, Keith A. Lewis
  • Re: cranky challenge - beating a game, James Waldby
  • Re: cranky challenge - beating a game, Nora Baron
    • Re: cranky challenge - beating a game, Jean-Claude Arbaut
  • Re: cranky challenge - beating a game, Adam Atkinson
    • Re: cranky challenge - beating a game, gangxu_csu
• Solving Simultaneous Equations, Michael Hims
  • Re: Solving Simultaneous Equations, Jim Spriggs
    • Re: Solving Simultaneous Equations, M.J.T. Guy
  • Re: Solving Simultaneous Equations, Jean-Claude Arbaut
    • Re: Solving Simultaneous Equations, Michael Hims
      • Re: Solving Simultaneous Equations, Jean-Claude Arbaut
      • Re: Solving Simultaneous Equations, Michael Hims
• Tic-tac-toe probability, Dan Dima
  • Re: Tic-tac-toe probability, Dan Dima
    • Re: Tic-tac-toe probability, Stephen J. Herschkorn
      • Re: Tic-tac-toe probability, Baruchspinoza
    • Re: Tic-tac-toe probability, Proginoskes
    • Re: Tic-tac-toe probability, Richard Henry
      • Re: Tic-tac-toe probability, Stephen J. Herschkorn
    • Re: Tic-tac-toe probability, Jean-Claude Arbaut
  • Re: Tic-tac-toe probability, Butch Malahide
    • Re: Tic-tac-toe probability, Richard Henry
    • Re: Tic-tac-toe probability, Lash Rambo
      • Re: Tic-tac-toe probability, Henry
      • Re: Tic-tac-toe probability, Jim Ferry
  • Re: Tic-tac-toe probability, Jim Ferry
  • Re: Tic-tac-toe probability, Keith A. Lewis
    • Re: Tic-tac-toe probability, James Dolan
• The product of all primes less than some x, Dan Dima
  • Re: The product of all primes less than some x, Gerry Myerson
    • Re: The product of all primes less than some x, Dave Rusin
  • Re: The product of all primes less than some x, luiroto
    • Re: The product of all primes less than some x, Dan Dima
      • Re: The product of all primes less than some x, Jean-Claude Arbaut
      • Re: The product of all primes less than some x, Anon
      • Re: The product of all primes less than some x, luiroto
      • Re: The product of all primes less than some x, luiroto
• Re: Why the metric committee chose the kilogram as the standard mass, bischar
• CRC, which error patterns can be detected?, pavelbaranov
  • Re: CRC, which error patterns can be detected?, Baruchspinoza
    • Re: CRC, which error patterns can be detected?, pavelbaranov
      • Re: CRC, which error patterns can be detected?, Baruchspinoza
    • Re: CRC, which error patterns can be detected?, Jyrki Lahtonen
      • Re: CRC, which error patterns can be detected?, pavelbaranov
      • Re: CRC, which error patterns can be detected?, SamHouston
      • Re: CRC, which error patterns can be detected?, Jyrki Lahtonen
      • Re: CRC, which error patterns can be detected?, Abelliae
• Re: Kuratowski's definition for a pair, Arturo Magidin
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Kuratowski's definition for a pair, Stephen J. Herschkorn
    • Re: Kuratowski's definition for a pair, Arturo Magidin
  • Re: Kuratowski's definition for a pair, Herman Rubin
    • Re: Kuratowski's definition for a pair, Hero
      • Re: Kuratowski's definition for a pair, Stephen J. Herschkorn
      • Re: Kuratowski's definition for a pair, Hero
      • Re: Kuratowski's definition for a pair, Stephen J. Herschkorn
      • Re: Kuratowski's definition for a pair, Hero
      • Re: Kuratowski's definition for a pair, Stephen J. Herschkorn
      • Re: Kuratowski's definition for a pair, Hero
      • Re: Kuratowski's definition for a pair, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: Kuratowski's definition for a pair, Hero
      • Re: Kuratowski's definition for a pair, Arturo Magidin
• Error rate probability, pavelbaranov
  • Re: Error rate probability, jj
    • Re: Error rate probability, Stephen J. Herschkorn
      • Re: Error rate probability, jj
      • Re: Error rate probability, pavelbaranov
      • Re: Error rate probability, jj
  • Re: Error rate probability, jan hauben
    • Re: Error rate probability, Baruchspinoza
      • Re: Error rate probability, jan hauben
      • Re: Error rate probability, pavelbaranov
      • Re: Error rate probability, Keith A. Lewis
      • Re: Error rate probability, Jeroen Boschma
      • Re: Error rate probability, Zod
  • Re: Error rate probability, jj
• To WW WADE, Tony
  • Re: To WW WADE, Jesse F. Hughes
    • Re: To WW WADE, Narcoleptic Insomniac
  • Re: To WW WADE, Tony
    • Re: To WW WADE, Lee Rudolph
    • Re: To WW WADE, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: To WW WADE, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: To WW WADE, David C . Ullrich
  • Re: To WW WADE, abe . buckingham
    • Re: To WW WADE, Lee Rudolph
      • Re: To WW WADE, abe . buckingham
• Field of interest in algebraic number theory?, Charlie
• The end of the division, Gabriele Avosani
  • Re: The end of the division, Devan L
• Help with Fibonacci & Co, bischar
  • Re: Help with Fibonacci & Co, Mitch Harris
  • Re: Help with Fibonacci & Co, achava
    • Re: Help with Fibonacci & Co, achava
  • Re: Help with Fibonacci & Co, gangxu_csu
  • Re: Help with Fibonacci & Co, bischar
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Help with Fibonacci & Co, bischar
    • Re: Help with Fibonacci & Co, Jean-Claude Arbaut
      • Re: Help with Fibonacci & Co, bischar
      • Re: Help with Fibonacci & Co, Jean-Claude Arbaut
      • Re: Help with Fibonacci & Co, bischar
      • Re: Help with Fibonacci & Co, Jean-Claude Arbaut
• Three collinear points, john_stivenson
  • Re: Three collinear points, William Elliot
    • Re: Three collinear points, john_stivenson
      • Re: Three collinear points, William Elliot
      • Re: Three collinear points, clem
  • Re: Three collinear points, Dave Rusin
    • Re: Three collinear points, john_stivenson
      • Re: Three collinear points, dbeckman
• (N+2)^N/(N+1)^N, Tony
  • Re: (N+2)^N/(N+1)^N, jj
  • Re: (N+2)^N/(N+1)^N, The World Wide Wade
  • Re: (N+2)^N/(N+1)^N, Jim Spriggs
  • Re: (N+2)^N/(N+1)^N, abe . buckingham
• Help With Sequence, Michael Hims
  • Re: Help With Sequence, jj
  • Re: Help With Sequence, G.E. Ivey
  • Re: Help With Sequence, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
• FLT extension problem, Craig Feinstein
  • Re: FLT extension problem, Stephen J. Herschkorn
    • Re: FLT extension problem, Robert Israel
      • Re: FLT extension problem, Stephen J. Herschkorn
      • Re: FLT extension problem, denis feldmann
      • Re: FLT extension problem, Jean-Claude Arbaut
  • Re: FLT extension problem, Jean-Claude Arbaut
    • Re: FLT extension problem, James Waldby
• Algorithm for generating distinct dominant sets, Peter Bencsik
• a distribution model, QQ
• maximizing the largest singular value of a product, jonagold
  • Re: maximizing the largest singular value of a product, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
    • Re: maximizing the largest singular value of a product, jonagold
      • Re: maximizing the largest singular value of a product, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
• Strangely familiar..., The Last Danish Pastry
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Strangely familiar..., The Last Danish Pastry
• (N+1)^N/N^N, Tony
  • Re: (N+1)^N/N^N, G. A. Edgar
  • Re: (N+1)^N/N^N, Tony
    • Re: (N+1)^N/N^N, José Carlos Santos
    • Re: (N+1)^N/N^N, abe . buckingham
    • Re: (N+1)^N/N^N, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
      • Re: (N+1)^N/N^N, Troy Burkes
      • Re: (N+1)^N/N^N, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
      • Re: (N+1)^N/N^N, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: (N+1)^N/N^N, Troy Burkes
      • Re: (N+1)^N/N^N, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
      • Re: (N+1)^N/N^N, Troy Burkes
      • Re: (N+1)^N/N^N, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: (N+1)^N/N^N, Troy Burkes
      • Re: (N+1)^N/N^N, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: (N+1)^N/N^N, Troy Burkes
      • Re: (N+1)^N/N^N, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: (N+1)^N/N^N, Troy Burkes
      • Re: (N+1)^N/N^N, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: (N+1)^N/N^N, Jean-Claude Arbaut
      • Re: (N+1)^N/N^N, A N Niel
      • Re: (N+1)^N/N^N, David M Einstein
      • Re: (N+1)^N/N^N, Jean-Claude Arbaut
      • Re: (N+1)^N/N^N, Robert Israel
      • Re: (N+1)^N/N^N, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: (N+1)^N/N^N, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
      • Re: (N+1)^N/N^N, Troy Burkes
      • Re: (N+1)^N/N^N, Lee Rudolph
  • Re: (N+1)^N/N^N, Tony
    • Re: (N+1)^N/N^N, Jean-Claude Arbaut
      • Re: (N+1)^N/N^N, jj
      • Re: (N+1)^N/N^N, Jean-Claude Arbaut
      • Re: (N+1)^N/N^N, jj
    • Re: (N+1)^N/N^N, Jan de Vos
    • Re: (N+1)^N/N^N, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: (N+1)^N/N^N, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: (N+1)^N/N^N, jj
      • Re: (N+1)^N/N^N, Robert Israel
      • Re: (N+1)^N/N^N, george ghiata
      • Re: (N+1)^N/N^N, Jesse F. Hughes
    • Re: (N+1)^N/N^N, abe . buckingham
      • Re: (N+1)^N/N^N, george ghiata
      • Re: (N+1)^N/N^N, Jean-Claude Arbaut
      • Re: (N+1)^N/N^N, abe . buckingham
      • Message not available
      • Re: (N+1)^N/N^N, Jesse F. Hughes
  • Re: (N+1)^N/N^N, Tony
    • Re: (N+1)^N/N^N, abe . buckingham
    • Re: (N+1)^N/N^N, Jean-Claude Arbaut
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: (N+1)^N/N^N, Lee Rudolph
  • Re: (N+1)^N/N^N, Jean-Claude Arbaut
• Re: Is the set N of natural numbers well defined?, apoorv
  • Re: Is the set N of natural numbers well defined?, Virgil
    • Re: Is the set N of natural numbers well defined?, apoorv
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Is the set N of natural numbers well defined?, fernando revilla
    • Re: Is the set N of natural numbers well defined?, Martin Semerád
      • Re: Is the set N of natural numbers well defined?, fernando revilla
      • Re: Is the set N of natural numbers well defined?, Martin Semerád
      • Re: Is the set N of natural numbers well defined?, fernando revilla
  • Re: Is the set N of natural numbers well defined?, apoorv
• algorithms for simplifying and solving equations, michael_quinlivan
  • Re: algorithms for simplifying and solving equations, Jean-Claude Arbaut
  • Re: algorithms for simplifying and solving equations, Robert Israel
    • Re: algorithms for simplifying and solving equations, michael_quinlivan
      • Re: algorithms for simplifying and solving equations, Mark Atherton
• Re: Resistance of infinite sheet, Peter Olcott
• What is the name of this algebra?, Alan
• Re: To Mr. Andrew Wiles:Do You Agree Fermat 's Proof Of FLT ever, Dik T. Winter
• Question relating to Density of Irrationals?, ruggeri
  • Re: Question relating to Density of Irrationals?, The World Wide Wade
  • Re: Question relating to Density of Irrationals?, Gerry Myerson
  • Re: Question relating to Density of Irrationals?, Timothy Little
  • Re: Question relating to Density of Irrationals?, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
    • Re: Question relating to Density of Irrationals?, A N Niel
• What is this problem and where did I find it?, achava
  • Re: What is this problem and where did I find it?, Ted Hwa
  • Re: What is this problem and where did I find it?, Gerry Myerson
    • Re: What is this problem and where did I find it?, Ioannis
      • Re: What is this problem and where did I find it?, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: What is this problem and where did I find it?, achava
  • Re: What is this problem and where did I find it?, achava
• transitive, antisymmetric and symmetric, but neither reflexive, nor reflexive,, mikharakiri_nospaum
  • Re: transitive, antisymmetric and symmetric, but neither reflexive, nor reflexive,, Arturo Magidin
    • Re: transitive, antisymmetric and symmetric, but neither reflexive, nor reflexive,, mikharakiri_nospaum
  • Re: transitive, antisymmetric and symmetric, but neither reflexive, nor reflexive,, mikharakiri_nospaum
• test, pungorr
• a question for stochastic data, QQ
  • Re: a question for stochastic data, Robert Vienneau
• Re: What is known about Exclusive 2SAT, Jesse F. Hughes
  • Re: What is known about Exclusive 2SAT, stephen
• Matrices division, Noa
  • Re: Matrices division, MosS
  • Re: Matrices division, Rouben Rostamian
  • Re: Matrices division, achava
    • Re: Matrices division, achava
  • Re: Matrices division, Hanford Carr
  • Re: Matrices division, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
    • Re: Matrices division, Proginoskes
      • Re: Matrices division, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
  • Re: Matrices division, Dik T. Winter
  • Re: Matrices division, Ken Starks
• Nukes, Anonymous via the Cypherpunks Tonga Remailer
• geometrical object, Leslaw Bieniasz
  • Re: geometrical object, Ioannis
  • Re: geometrical object, Jonny Evans
  • Re: geometrical object, James Buddenhagen
  • Re: geometrical object, JEMebius
  • Re: geometrical object, Dave Rusin
  • Re: geometrical object, Martin
• Book on Introduction to lie groups and lie algebras, MosS
  • Re: Book on Introduction to lie groups and lie algebras, Jonny Evans
  • Re: Book on Introduction to lie groups and lie algebras, José Carlos Santos
• Occult Pentagrams in Washingtons architecture, George Orwell
  • Re: Occult Pentagrams in Washingtons architecture, Keith A. Lewis
• Numerical quadrature for uneven spacing?, Russ
  • Re: Numerical quadrature for uneven spacing?, Rouben Rostamian
    • Re: Numerical quadrature for uneven spacing?, Russ
  • Re: Numerical quadrature for uneven spacing?, mhill37
    • Re: Numerical quadrature for uneven spacing?, Russ
      • Re: Numerical quadrature for uneven spacing?, mhill37
  • Re: Numerical quadrature for uneven spacing?, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
    • Re: Numerical quadrature for uneven spacing?, martin cohen
      • Re: Numerical quadrature for uneven spacing?, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
      • Re: Numerical quadrature for uneven spacing?, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
• Rsa Labs offline ?, Davide
  • Re: Rsa Labs offline ?, Jean-Claude Arbaut
• Morphisms of affine varieties, Jonny Evans
  • Re: Morphisms of affine varieties, Jannick Asmus
    • Re: Morphisms of affine varieties, Jonny Evans
• Request comment on Probability calculation scenario, Bosco
  • Re: Request comment on Probability calculation scenario, Keith A. Lewis
    • Re: Request comment on Probability calculation scenario, Bosco
  • Re: Request comment on Probability calculation scenario, Daniel McLaury
    • Re: Request comment on Probability calculation scenario, Bosco
    • Re: Request comment on Probability calculation scenario, matt271829-news
      • Re: Request comment on Probability calculation scenario, matt271829-news
      • Re: Request comment on Probability calculation scenario, The Qurqirish Dragon
  • Re: Request comment on Probability calculation scenario, Timothy Little
  • Re: Request comment on Probability calculation scenario, matt271829-news
    • Re: Request comment on Probability calculation scenario, matt271829-news
      • Re: Request comment on Probability calculation scenario, matt271829-news
• f = f(x, y), jerrymsimm
  • Re: f = f(x, y), Jean-Claude Arbaut
    • Re: f = f(x, y), jerrymsimm
  • Re: f = f(x, y), jerrymsimm
    • Re: f = f(x, y), Rouben Rostamian
      • Re: f = f(x, y), jerrymsimm
      • Re: f = f(x, y), Rouben Rostamian
      • Re: f = f(x, y), jerrymsimm
      • Re: f = f(x, y), Rouben Rostamian
      • Re: f = f(x, y), jerrymsimm
      • Re: f = f(x, y), Rouben Rostamian
      • Re: f = f(x, y), Jiri Lebl
      • Re: f = f(x, y), jerrymsimm
      • Re: f = f(x, y), Jiri Lebl
      • Re: f = f(x, y), jerrymsimm
      • Re: f = f(x, y), Jiri Lebl
  • Re: f = f(x, y), Peter Webb
    • Re: f = f(x, y), Rick Decker
    • Re: f = f(x, y), Herman Rubin
  • Re: f = f(x, y), abe . buckingham
  • Re: f = f(x, y), William Elliot
  • Re: f = f(x, y), Proginoskes
    • Re: f = f(x, y), jerrymsimm
  • Re: f = f(x, y), William Elliot
  • Re: f = f(x, y), Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
• Re: variance of product of uncorrelated variables, didier salle
• Gaussian Kernel Integral, alfonx
  • Re: Gaussian Kernel Integral, Aage Andersen
    • Re: Gaussian Kernel Integral, alfonx
      • Re: Gaussian Kernel Integral, Jean-Claude Arbaut
    • Re: Gaussian Kernel Integral, G. A. Edgar
  • Re: Gaussian Kernel Integral, Aage Andersen
    • Re: Gaussian Kernel Integral, alfonx
      • Re: Gaussian Kernel Integral, G. A. Edgar
      • Re: Gaussian Kernel Integral, alfonx
  • Re: Gaussian Kernel Integral, Herman Rubin
• A very simple question (I think!), jimal1971
  • Re: A very simple question (I think!), José Carlos Santos
  • Re: A very simple question (I think!), Jean-Claude Arbaut
  • Re: A very simple question (I think!), William Elliot
• Re: Question - Embedded Spaces - Properties versus Relations, JEMebius
  • Re: Question - Embedded Spaces - Properties versus Relations - Supplement, JEMebius
• Re: sexiest math PhD babe, Jesse F. Hughes
  • Re: sexiest math PhD babe, double d
• Nonlinear Differential Equation, michi
  • Re: Nonlinear Differential Equation, john_ramsden
  • Re: Nonlinear Differential Equation, Rouben Rostamian
  • Re: Nonlinear Differential Equation, Robert Israel
    • Re: Nonlinear Differential Equation, michi
      • Re: Nonlinear Differential Equation, Robert Israel
      • Re: Nonlinear Differential Equation, michi
      • Re: Nonlinear Differential Equation, Robert Israel
      • Re: Nonlinear Differential Equation, michi
• Urysohn Lemma, Daisuke Toriumi
  • Re: Urysohn Lemma, William Elliot
  • Re: Urysohn Lemma, Lasse
  • Re: Urysohn Lemma, Ulysse Keller
• Proof <- induction, John den Haan
  • Re: Proof <- induction, Torsten Hennig
  • Re: Proof <- induction, William Elliot
  • Re: Proof <- induction, Bill Dubuque
• Is this expression viewable on sci.math?, Konrad Viltersten
  • Re: Is this expression viewable on sci.math?, Robert Israel
    • Re: Is this expression viewable on sci.math?, Gottfried Helms
  • Re: Is this expression viewable on sci.math?, Virgil
    • Re: Is this expression viewable on sci.math?, Thorsten Klein
      • Re: Is this expression viewable on sci.math?, Timothy Little
      • Re: Is this expression viewable on sci.math?, William Elliot
      • Re: Is this expression viewable on sci.math?, David Kastrup
      • Re: Is this expression viewable on sci.math?, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Is this expression viewable on sci.math?, David Kastrup
      • Re: Is this expression viewable on sci.math?, William Elliot
      • Re: Is this expression viewable on sci.math?, William Elliot
      • Re: Is this expression viewable on sci.math?, Dik T. Winter
      • Re: Is this expression viewable on sci.math?, Jean-Claude Arbaut
  • Re: Is this expression viewable on sci.math?, William Elliot
  • Re: Is this expression viewable on sci.math?, Richard Henry
    • Re: Is this expression viewable on sci.math?, William Elliot
  • Re: Is this expression viewable on sci.math?, Aage Andersen
    • Re: Is this expression viewable on sci.math?, William Elliot
      • Re: Is this expression viewable on sci.math?, Jean-Claude Arbaut
      • Re: Is this expression viewable on sci.math?, William Elliot
  • Re: Is this expression viewable on sci.math?, Jean-Claude Arbaut
  • Re: Is this expression viewable on sci.math?, Herman Rubin
    • Re: Is this expression viewable on sci.math?, William Elliot
    • Re: Is this expression viewable on sci.math?, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
  • Re: Is this expression viewable on sci.math?, conesetter
    • Re: Is this expression viewable on sci.math?, Timothy Little
      • Re: Is this expression viewable on sci.math?, Jeremy Boden
      • Re: Is this expression viewable on sci.math?, Konrad Viltersten
      • Re: Is this expression viewable on sci.math?, Jean-Claude Arbaut
    • Re: Is this expression viewable on sci.math?, Konrad Viltersten
      • Re: Is this expression viewable on sci.math?, William Elliot
      • Re: Is this expression viewable on sci.math?, Timothy Little
      • Re: Is this expression viewable on sci.math?, William Elliot
      • Re: Is this expression viewable on sci.math?, Konrad Viltersten
      • Re: Is this expression viewable on sci.math?, Torkel Franzen
• Percentage for Profitability Charts, KBH
• In seeking of guidance on math problem (matrix, algebra, topology, classic Lie groups, differential manifold), K. Y.
• Branch and bound ideas needed, Neill Clift [MSFT]
• Re: "Are these operators commutative ,Why? ", Jean-Claude Arbaut
  • Re: "Are these operators commutative ,Why? ", alainverghote
• get the sample pdf function, poison . summer
• A paradoxical series?, Ann Chance
  • Re: A paradoxical series?, N. Silver
  • Re: A paradoxical series?, Jean-Claude Arbaut
    • Re: A paradoxical series?, Jean-Claude Arbaut
      • Re: A paradoxical series?, Ann Chance
      • Re: A paradoxical series?, Jean-Claude Arbaut
      • Re: A paradoxical series?, G.E. Ivey
      • Re: A paradoxical series?, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: A paradoxical series?, Lee Rudolph
      • Re: A paradoxical series?, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: A paradoxical series?, Valeriu Anisiu
      • Re: A paradoxical series?, Jean-Claude Arbaut
      • Re: A paradoxical series?, Jean-Claude Arbaut
  • Re: A paradoxical series?, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
  • Re: A paradoxical series?, Jeremy Boden
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • A paradoxical series?, w . taylor
• division by zero and complex nymbers, Ann Chance
  • Re: division by zero and complex nymbers, Jim Spriggs
    • Re: division by zero and complex nymbers, Ann Chance
      • Re: division by zero and complex nymbers, Jean-Claude Arbaut
      • Re: division by zero and complex nymbers, David W . Cantrell
      • Re: division by zero and complex nymbers, Jean-Claude Arbaut
      • Re: division by zero and complex nymbers, David W . Cantrell
      • Re: division by zero and complex nymbers, Jean-Claude Arbaut
      • Re: division by zero and complex nymbers, abe . buckingham
  • Re: division by zero and complex nymbers, Jean-Claude Arbaut
  • Re: division by zero and complex nymbers, Patrick
    • Re: division by zero and complex nymbers, Ann Chance
    • Re: division by zero and complex nymbers, David W . Cantrell
      • Re: division by zero and complex nymbers, Patrick
    • Re: division by zero and complex nymbers, Jiri Lebl
      • Re: division by zero and complex nymbers, Dik T. Winter
  • Re: division by zero and complex nymbers, jj
    • Re: division by zero and complex nymbers, Jean-Claude Arbaut
      • Re: division by zero and complex nymbers, jj
      • Re: division by zero and complex nymbers, Jean-Claude Arbaut
      • Re: division by zero and complex nymbers, Dik T. Winter
      • Re: division by zero and complex nymbers, Jean-Claude Arbaut
      • Re: division by zero and complex nymbers, Jiri Lebl
  • Re: division by zero and complex nymbers, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
  • Re: division by zero and complex nymbers, Jiri Lebl
    • Re: division by zero and complex nymbers, Jean-Claude Arbaut
      • Re: division by zero and complex nymbers, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: division by zero and complex nymbers, Jiri Lebl
      • Re: division by zero and complex nymbers, Jean-Claude Arbaut
      • Re: division by zero and complex nymbers, Jiri Lebl
      • Re: division by zero and complex nymbers, Jean-Claude Arbaut
      • Re: division by zero and complex nymbers, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: division by zero and complex nymbers, Jean-Claude Arbaut
      • Re: division by zero and complex nymbers, Jiri Lebl
      • Re: division by zero and complex nymbers, Dirk Van de moortel
    • Re: division by zero and complex nymbers, David W . Cantrell
    • Re: division by zero and complex nymbers, Jussi Piitulainen
      • Re: division by zero and complex nymbers, Jiri Lebl
    • Re: division by zero and complex nymbers, Dik T. Winter
      • Re: division by zero and complex nymbers, Lee Rudolph
  • Re: division by zero and complex nymbers, Roger Beresford
• Re: HERE: A GENIUS AMATEUR's SCIENCE ARTICLES POSTING(updated), Jean-Claude Arbaut
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: HERE: A GENIUS AMATEUR's SCIENCE ARTICLES POSTING(updated), bryant_j_j
  • Re: HERE: A GENIUS AMATEUR's SCIENCE ARTICLES POSTING(updated), john_ramsden
• reason for lim_(n->oo) n*(-1)^n /(n+4) does not exist, Herb
  • Re: reason for lim_(n->oo) n*(-1)^n /(n+4) does not exist, William Elliot
  • Re: reason for lim_(n->oo) n*(-1)^n /(n+4) does not exist, David C . Ullrich
  • Re: reason for lim_(n->oo) n*(-1)^n /(n+4) does not exist, N. Silver
  • Re: reason for lim_(n->oo) n*(-1)^n /(n+4) does not exist, george ghiata
    • Re: reason for lim_(n->oo) n*(-1)^n /(n+4) does not exist, george ghiata
      • Re: reason for lim_(n->oo) n*(-1)^n /(n+4) does not exist, george ghiata
      • Re: reason for lim_(n->oo) n*(-1)^n /(n+4) does not exist, Proginoskes
      • Re: reason for lim_(n->oo) n*(-1)^n /(n+4) does not exist, george ghiata
      • Re: reason for lim_(n->oo) n*(-1)^n /(n+4) does not exist, george ghiata
      • Re: reason for lim_(n->oo) n*(-1)^n /(n+4) does not exist, Proginoskes
      • Re: reason for lim_(n->oo) n*(-1)^n /(n+4) does not exist, george ghiata
      • Re: reason for lim_(n->oo) n*(-1)^n /(n+4) does not exist, Proginoskes
• Rotations of T,N,B vector triad in a loop, Narasimham
• real analysis question, Herb
  • Re: real analysis question, José Carlos Santos
  • Re: real analysis question, Jean-Claude Arbaut
    • Re: real analysis question, The World Wide Wade
      • Re: real analysis question, Jean-Claude Arbaut
      • Re: real analysis question, Justin Young
      • Re: real analysis question, Jean-Claude Arbaut
• alternating group, Li Yi
  • Re: alternating group, Rupert
    • Re: alternating group, Li Yi
      • Re: alternating group, José Carlos Santos
      • Re: alternating group, Li Yi
      • Re: alternating group,
      • Re: alternating group, Li Yi
      • Re: alternating group, Rupert
      • Re: alternating group, Jyrki Lahtonen
      • Re: alternating group,
  • Re: alternating group, JEMebius
    • Re: alternating group, Dave Rusin
      • Re: alternating group -, JEMebius
      • Re: alternating group -, Jean-Claude Arbaut
• Free talk radio, Nomen Nescio
• X= ?, alexandru . lupas
  • Re: X= ?, David W . Cantrell
    • Re: X= ?, alexandru . lupas
      • Re: X= ?, Jean-Claude Arbaut
  • Re: X= ?, Proginoskes
    • Re: X= ?, alexandru . lupas
• Adjunction Spaces, Justin Young
  • Re: Adjunction Spaces, Per Vognsen
    • Re: Adjunction Spaces, Justin Young
      • Re: Adjunction Spaces, Per Vognsen
      • Re: Adjunction Spaces, Per Vognsen
      • Re: Adjunction Spaces, Justin Young
  • Re: Adjunction Spaces, William Elliot
• Question on compact space.., James
  • Re: Question on compact space.., barr
• Shrieks and splashes, ps218
  • Re: Shrieks and splashes, Min@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Shrieks and splashes, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Shrieks and splashes, Jeremy Boden
      • Re: Shrieks and splashes, ps218
      • Re: Shrieks and splashes, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Shrieks and splashes, gerard46
      • Re: Shrieks and splashes, Ioannis
  • Re: Shrieks and splashes, Jim Burns
  • Re: Shrieks and splashes, Phil Carmody
  • Re: Shrieks and splashes, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
• Goldbach and Levy conjectures, conradeaton
  • Re: Goldbach and Levy conjectures, Gerry Myerson
• What are the odds?, Dan
  • Re: What are the odds?, Phil Freedenberg
    • Re: What are the odds?, Mike Kent
  • Re: What are the odds?, Jim Spriggs
  • Re: What are the odds?, Dan
• 2nd order stochastic process, phdscholar80
• Help me master mathematics!, TnT
  • Re: Help me master mathematics!, William Elliot
    • Re: Help me master mathematics!, Chan-Ho Suh
      • Re: Help me master mathematics!, William Elliot
    • Re: Help me master mathematics!, David Ames
  • Re: Help me master mathematics!, Ken Starks
  • Re: Help me master mathematics!, Jim Spriggs
  • Re: Help me master mathematics!, double d
    • Re: Help me master mathematics!, Jean-Claude Arbaut
    • Re: Help me master mathematics!, N. Silver
      • Re: Help me master mathematics!, double d
      • Re: Help me master mathematics!, Devan L
      • Re: Help me master mathematics!, double d
      • Re: Help me master mathematics!, Torkel Franzen
      • Re: Help me master mathematics!, Jean-Claude Arbaut
      • Re: Help me master mathematics!, ArtflDodgr
      • Re: Help me master mathematics!, double d
      • Re: Help me master mathematics!, Devan L
      • Re: Help me master mathematics!, double d
      • Re: Help me master mathematics!, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Help me master mathematics!, double d
      • Re: Help me master mathematics!, Jean-Claude Arbaut
      • Re: Help me master mathematics!, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Help me master mathematics!, Wayne Brown
      • Re: Help me master mathematics!, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Help me master mathematics!, double d
      • Re: Help me master mathematics!, double d
      • Re: Help me master mathematics!, Wayne Brown
      • Re: Help me master mathematics!, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Help me master mathematics!, Devan L
      • Re: Help me master mathematics!, Wayne Brown
      • Re: Help me master mathematics!, double d
      • Re: Help me master mathematics!, Lynn Kurtz
      • Re: Help me master mathematics!, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Help me master mathematics!, double d
      • Re: Help me master mathematics!, Devan L
      • Re: Help me master mathematics!, Jeremy Boden
      • Re: Help me master mathematics!, double d
  • Re: Help me master mathematics!, Tony
• Compact subsets of {0,1}^N, William Elliot
  • Re: Compact subsets of {0,1}^N, David C . Ullrich
    • Re: Compact subsets of {0,1}^N, Timothy Murphy
      • Re: Compact subsets of {0,1}^N, barr
      • Re: Compact subsets of {0,1}^N, David C . Ullrich
    • Re: Compact subsets of {0,1}^N, William Elliot
    • Re: Compact subsets of {0,1}^N, William Elliot
      • Re: Compact subsets of {0,1}^N, David C . Ullrich
    • Re: Compact subsets of {0,1}^N, William Elliot
      • Re: Compact subsets of {0,1}^N, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Compact subsets of {0,1}^N, William Elliot
      • Re: Compact subsets of {0,1}^N, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Compact subsets of {0,1}^N, William Elliot
      • Re: Compact subsets of {0,1}^N, David C . Ullrich
      • Compact subsets of {0,1}^N, William Elliot
      • Re: Compact subsets of {0,1}^N, David C . Ullrich
• Re: Google is an antisoul company, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Ethnomathematics--WSJ, June 20, 2005, W. Watson
  • Re: Ethnomathematics--WSJ, June 20, 2005, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Ethnomathematics--WSJ, June 20, 2005, W. Watson
• Re: To Mr. Andrew Wiles:Do You Agree Fermat 's Proof Of FLT ever existed?, Dik T. Winter
  • Re: To Mr. Andrew Wiles:Do You Agree Fermat 's Proof Of FLT ever existed?, george ghiata
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: To Mr. Andrew Wiles:Do You Agree Fermat 's Proof Of FLT ever existed?, John Gabbriel
    • Re: To Mr. Andrew Wiles:Do You Agree Fermat 's Proof Of FLT ever existed?, george ghiata
      • Re: To Mr. Andrew Wiles:Do You Agree Fermat 's Proof Of FLT ever existed?, Dave Rusin
  • Re: To Mr. Andrew Wiles:Do You Agree Fermat 's Proof Of FLT ever existed?, Arturo Magidin
    • Re: To Mr. Andrew Wiles:Do You Agree Fermat 's Proof Of FLT ever existed?, Proginoskes
  • Re: To Mr. Andrew Wiles:Do You Agree Fermat 's Proof Of FLT ever existed?, abe . buckingham
• Probability Problem, simondex
  • Re: Probability Problem, William Elliot
    • Re: Probability Problem, simondex
      • Re: Probability Problem, William Elliot
      • Re: Probability Problem, Jean-Claude Arbaut
      • Re: Probability Problem, matt271829-news
      • Re: Probability Problem, Jean-Claude Arbaut
• THE 3d Correct PROOF OF FERMAT LAST THEOREM, george ghiata
  • Re: THE 3d Correct PROOF OF FERMAT LAST THEOREM, Randy Poe
    • Re: THE 3d Correct PROOF OF FERMAT LAST THEOREM, bryant_j_j
  • Re: THE 3d Correct PROOF OF FERMAT LAST THEOREM, george ghiata
  • Re: THE 3d Correct PROOF OF FERMAT LAST THEOREM, george ghiata
  • Re: THE 3d Correct PROOF OF FERMAT LAST THEOREM, Proginoskes
    • Re: THE 3d Correct PROOF OF FERMAT LAST THEOREM, george ghiata
      • Re: THE 3d Correct PROOF OF FERMAT LAST THEOREM, Tonico
      • Re: THE 3d Correct PROOF OF FERMAT LAST THEOREM, bryant_j_j
      • Re: THE 3d Correct PROOF OF FERMAT LAST THEOREM, matt271829-news
      • Re: THE 3d Correct PROOF OF FERMAT LAST THEOREM, abe . buckingham
      • Re: THE 3d Correct PROOF OF FERMAT LAST THEOREM, george ghiata
      • Re: THE 3d Correct PROOF OF FERMAT LAST THEOREM, Tonico
      • Re: THE 3d Correct PROOF OF FERMAT LAST THEOREM, bryant_j_j
• diophantine equation and squares, Jean-Claude Arbaut
  • Re: diophantine equation and squares - Cannonball Problem, JEMebius
    • Re: diophantine equation and squares - Cannonball Problem, Jean-Claude Arbaut
  • Re: diophantine equation and squares, george ghiata
• The sum of squares., Michael
  • Re: The sum of squares., Jean-Claude Arbaut
    • Re: The sum of squares., Jean-Claude Arbaut
      • Re: The sum of squares., Gottfried Helms
    • Re: The sum of squares., Gib Bogle
      • Re: The sum of squares., Jean-Claude Arbaut
      • Re: The sum of squares., Gib Bogle
      • Re: The sum of squares., Juanjo
      • Re: The sum of squares., Jean-Claude Arbaut
  • Re: The sum of squares., Stephen J. Herschkorn
  • Re: The sum of squares., Mkajuma
  • Re: The sum of squares., Juanjo
    • Re: The sum of squares., Robert Israel
      • Re: The sum of squares., Anon
  • Re: The sum of squares., Virgil
  • Re: The sum of squares., Anon
    • Re: The sum of squares., Anon
  • Re: The sum of squares., Michael
• Re: Google is illegal, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Google is illegal, Devan L
  • Re: Google is illegal, David Ames
  • Re: Google is illegal, Joseph Hertzlinger
• Re: Vladimir Bondarenko - Refereed Publication # 2 - International Symposium on Symbolic and Algebraic Computation - 1996 - Status: Accepted: Dr Wolfgang Kuechlin: Poster Session Chair - ISSAC'96, Jesse F. Hughes
  • Re: Vladimir Bondarenko - Refereed Publication # 2 - International Symposium on Symbolic and Algebraic Computation - 1996 - Status: Accepted: Dr Wolfgang Kuechlin: Poster Session Chair - ISSAC'96, bryant_j_j
  • Re: Vladimir Bondarenko - Refereed Publication # 2 - International, Dik T. Winter
• Help with solutions to two DEs, carlos5100
  • Re: Help with solutions to two DEs, Robert Israel
    • Re: Help with solutions to two DEs, carlos5100
      • Re: Help with solutions to two DEs, carlos5100
      • Re: Help with solutions to two DEs, Ioannis
      • Re: Help with solutions to two DEs, carlos5100
      • Re: Help with solutions to two DEs, carlos5100
      • Re: Help with solutions to two DEs, Ioannis
  • Re: Help with solutions to two DEs, Ioannis
• Implicit differentiation, paully21
  • Re: Implicit differentiation, Kvetch
    • Re: Implicit differentiation, paully21
  • Re: Implicit differentiation, Dan
  • Re: Implicit differentiation, David C . Ullrich
  • Re: Implicit differentiation, JEMebius
    • Re: Implicit differentiation, paully21
      • Re: Implicit differentiation, JEMebius
    • Re: Implicit differentiation, Alex
• Re: The factoring problem, Johann Wiesenbauer
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: The factoring problem, Jesse F. Hughes
    • Re: The factoring problem, Jean-Claude Arbaut
  • Re: The factoring problem, Johann Wiesenbauer
• partial derivative, N. Karjanto
  • Re: partial derivative, José Carlos Santos
    • Re: partial derivative, KeithK
      • Re: partial derivative, José Carlos Santos
      • Re: partial derivative, KeithK
      • Re: partial derivative, José Carlos Santos
      • Re: partial derivative, matt271829-news
      • Re: partial derivative, José Carlos Santos
      • Re: partial derivative, matt271829-news
• If Herc's lies were felonies, with three-strikes rule, Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
  • Re: If Herc's lies were felonies, with three-strikes rule, Dirk Van de moortel
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • If Herc's lies were felonies, with three-strikes rule, Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
  • If Herc's lies were felonies, with three-strikes rule, Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
• Re: The WHO CARES proof of anti-anti-diagonalisation, Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: The WHO CARES proof of anti-anti-diagonalisation, Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
  • Re: The WHO CARES proof of anti-anti-diagonalisation, Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
  • Re: The WHO CARES proof of anti-anti-diagonalisation, Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
  • Re: The WHO CARES proof of anti-anti-diagonalisation, Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
• Re: Humans don't exist in America, Joseph Hertzlinger
• A variation on the Secretary Problem, Zass
  • Re: A variation on the Secretary Problem, Robert Israel
    • Re: A variation on the Secretary Problem, Zass
      • Re: A variation on the Secretary Problem, Zass
      • Re: A variation on the Secretary Problem, Dave Rusin
    • Re: A variation on the Secretary Problem, Zass
      • Re: A variation on the Secretary Problem, Robert Israel
      • Re: A variation on the Secretary Problem, Herman Rubin
    • Re: A variation on the Secretary Problem, gangxu_csu
    • Re: A variation on the Secretary Problem, \"Gary Z.\"
  • Re: A variation on the Secretary Problem, Jeremy Boden
• Some Binomial Identities, clashton
  • Re: Some Binomial Identities, Proginoskes
    • Re: Some Binomial Identities, Jean-Claude Arbaut
  • Re: Some Binomial Identities, Robert Israel
  • Re: Some Binomial Identities, Proginoskes
• Applications of Continued Fractions?, Proginoskes
  • Re: Applications of Continued Fractions?, Jean-Claude Arbaut
    • Re: Applications of Continued Fractions?, Ken Pledger
    • Re: Applications of Continued Fractions?, Dik T. Winter
      • Re: Applications of Continued Fractions?, Proginoskes
      • Re: Applications of Continued Fractions?, Thomas Baruchel
    • Re: Applications of Continued Fractions?, Proginoskes
      • Re: Applications of Continued Fractions?, Jean-Claude Arbaut
      • Re: Applications of Continued Fractions?, Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
    • Re: Applications of Continued Fractions?, Thomas Baruchel
    • Re: Applications of Continued Fractions?, Thomas Baruchel
  • Re: Applications of Continued Fractions?, Lee Rudolph
  • Re: Applications of Continued Fractions?, Herman Rubin
  • Re: Applications of Continued Fractions?, Proginoskes
    • Re: Applications of Continued Fractions?, Gerry Myerson
    • Re: Applications of Continued Fractions?, Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
    • Re: Applications of Continued Fractions?, David M Einstein
    • Re: Applications of Continued Fractions?, Herman Rubin
  • Re: Applications of Continued Fractions?, bryant_j_j
  • Re: Applications of Continued Fractions?, Anon
    • Re: Applications of Continued Fractions?, Thomas Baruchel
      • Re: Applications of Continued Fractions?, Jean-Claude Arbaut
      • Re: Applications of Continued Fractions?, Thomas Baruchel
      • Re: Applications of Continued Fractions?, Jean-Claude Arbaut
    • Re: Applications of Continued Fractions?, alainverghote
      • Re: Applications of Continued Fractions?, Lee Rudolph
  • Re: Applications of Continued Fractions?, Randall
  • Re: Applications of Continued Fractions?, Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
  • Re: Applications of Continued Fractions?, Jim Spriggs
• minimal conditions to define the normal derivation, richard_lavoie
• BSoduko solver, @Bog
• Sino notation, chris
  • Re: Sino notation, Phil Freedenberg
  • Re: Sino notation, Tomas Andersson
    • Re: Sino notation, chris
  • Re: Sino notation, Herman Rubin
  • Re: Sino notation, Christopher J. Henrich
• math/programming, bob
  • Re: math/programming, Daniel McLaury
• Math tools for handout, jer . hughes
  • Re: Math tools for handout, Don Coppersmith
    • Re: Math tools for handout, Jeremy Boden
      • Re: Math tools for handout, jer . hughes
      • Re: Math tools for handout, jer . hughes
  • Re: Math tools for handout, Jeremy Boden
  • Re: Math tools for handout, Jeremy Boden
  • Re: Math tools for handout, The Qurqirish Dragon
    • Re: Math tools for handout, The Qurqirish Dragon
      • Re: Math tools for handout, jer . hughes
      • Re: Math tools for handout, Jeremy Boden
• Continuity of coordinates, Peregere
  • Re: Continuity of coordinates, Bosco
  • Re: Continuity of coordinates, Dave Rusin
• sci.math.num-analysis, richard_lavoie
• Re: About Mr. Prof.ANDREW WILES'PROOF OF FLT, george ghiata
  • Re: About Mr. Prof.ANDREW WILES'PROOF OF FLT, Dik T. Winter
    • Re: About Mr. Prof.ANDREW WILES'PROOF OF FLT, Proginoskes
      • Re: About Mr. Prof.ANDREW WILES'PROOF OF FLT, Dik T. Winter
    • Re: About Mr. Prof.ANDREW WILES'PROOF OF FLT, denis feldmann
    • Re: About Mr. Prof.ANDREW WILES'PROOF OF FLT, george ghiata
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: About Mr. Prof.ANDREW WILES'PROOF OF FLT, george ghiata
  • Re: About Mr. Prof.ANDREW WILES'PROOF OF FLT, george ghiata
    • Re: About Mr. Prof.ANDREW WILES'PROOF OF FLT, Jean-Claude Arbaut
    • Re: About Mr. Prof.ANDREW WILES'PROOF OF FLT, Randy Poe
      • Re: About Mr. Prof.ANDREW WILES'PROOF OF FLT, george ghiata
      • Re: About Mr. Prof.ANDREW WILES'PROOF OF FLT, Jean-Claude Arbaut
      • Re: About Mr. Prof.ANDREW WILES'PROOF OF FLT, george ghiata
    • Re: About Mr. Prof.ANDREW WILES'PROOF OF FLT, Jiri Lebl
      • Re: About Mr. Prof.ANDREW WILES'PROOF OF FLT, george ghiata
      • Re: About Mr. Prof.ANDREW WILES'PROOF OF FLT, Jean-Claude Arbaut
      • Re: About Mr. Prof.ANDREW WILES'PROOF OF FLT, george ghiata
      • Re: About Mr. Prof.ANDREW WILES'PROOF OF FLT, Proginoskes
      • Re: About Mr. Prof.ANDREW WILES'PROOF OF FLT, bryant_j_j
      • Re: About Mr. Prof.ANDREW WILES'PROOF OF FLT, Jean-Claude Arbaut
    • Re: About Mr. Prof.ANDREW WILES'PROOF OF FLT, george ghiata
• Re: Gheorghe Ghiata: CONSPIRATION or WHAT?, Roman B. Binder
  • Re: Gheorghe Ghiata: CONSPIRATION or WHAT?, george ghiata
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Gheorghe Ghiata: CONSPIRATION or WHAT?, Roman B. Binder
  • Re: Gheorghe Ghiata: CONSPIRATION or WHAT?, Roman B. Binder
• Quartiles, Mo
  • Re: Quartiles, G.E. Ivey
    • Re: Quartiles, Mo
      • Re: Quartiles, Robert Israel
      • Re: Quartiles, Ken Starks
      • Re: Quartiles, Ken Starks
• Discrete Optimization, Onno Garms
  • Re: Discrete Optimization, mhill37
    • Re: Discrete Optimization, Onno Garms
  • Re: Discrete Optimization, scattered
    • Re: Discrete Optimization, Rob Pratt
      • Re: Discrete Optimization, Rob Pratt
      • Re: Discrete Optimization, Rob Pratt
      • Re: Discrete Optimization, Onno Garms
      • Re: Discrete Optimization, Onno Garms
      • Re: Discrete Optimization, Rob Pratt
      • Re: Discrete Optimization, Onno Garms
      • Re: Discrete Optimization, Rob Pratt
      • Re: Discrete Optimization, Onno Garms
      • Re: Discrete Optimization, Onno Garms
      • Re: Discrete Optimization, Onno Garms
    • Re: Discrete Optimization, Onno Garms
• maple trial version, anbra1
  • Re: maple trial version, A N Niel
• meromorfic function on the torus and divisors, funny
  • Re: meromorfic function on the torus and divisors, Lee Rudolph
  • Re: meromorfic function on the torus and divisors, Timothy Murphy
• Puny (punny) riddle, Hauke Reddmann
  • Re: Puny (punny) riddle, Mike Terry
    • Re: Puny (punny) riddle, Hauke Reddmann
      • Re: Puny (punny) riddle, Rob Pratt
• Re: Conversion from Cartesian to parametric, Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Conversion from Cartesian to parametric, Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
    • Re: Conversion from Cartesian to parametric, conesetter
• Why are there no math prodigy monkeys?, double d
  • Re: Why are there no math prodigy monkeys?, bryant_j_j
    • Re: Why are there no math prodigy monkeys?, double d
      • Re: Why are there no math prodigy monkeys?, bryant_j_j
      • Re: Why are there no math prodigy monkeys?, Jean-Claude Arbaut
  • Re: Why are there no math prodigy monkeys?, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Why are there no math prodigy monkeys?, Jean-Claude Arbaut
  • Re: Why are there no math prodigy monkeys?, David C . Ullrich
    • Re: Why are there no math prodigy monkeys?, Lee Rudolph
      • Re: Why are there no math prodigy monkeys?, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Why are there no math prodigy monkeys?, Robert Israel
      • Re: Why are there no math prodigy monkeys?, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Why are there no math prodigy monkeys?, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Why are there no math prodigy monkeys?, Jean-Claude Arbaut
      • Re: Why are there no math prodigy monkeys?, Russell
      • Re: Why are there no math prodigy monkeys?, David C . Ullrich
    • Re: Why are there no math prodigy monkeys?, abe . buckingham
      • Re: Why are there no math prodigy monkeys?, double d
    • Re: Why are there no math prodigy monkeys?, Proginoskes
  • Re: Why are there no math prodigy monkeys?, ToddSmith
    • Re: Why are there no math prodigy monkeys?, chris
      • Re: Why are there no math prodigy monkeys?, Jean-Claude Arbaut
  • Re: Why are there no math prodigy monkeys?, pan
• Help with Kolmogorov bkwd eqn and Bharucha-Reid Markov text, Steve
  • Re: Help with Kolmogorov bkwd eqn and Bharucha-Reid Markov text, Steve
• Ramanujan's Continued Fractions, titus_piezas
• NEW QUANT JOBS DAILY - www.quantster.com, quantster.com
• comparing vectors, Je1234
  • Re: comparing vectors, Zdislav V. Kovarik
• newbie category theory exercise, fat agnus
  • Re: newbie category theory exercise, Arturo Magidin
    • Re: newbie category theory exercise, fat agnus
• ? some lim behavior of diffusion eqn, Cheng Cosine
• newforms on Gamma_0(N), Kilian Kilger
  • Re: newforms on Gamma_0(N), Merten Lampe
    • Re: newforms on Gamma_0(N), Kilian Kilger
      • Re: newforms on Gamma_0(N), Merten Lampe
• Pen and paper demonstraion of non trivial zero of Rieman's Zeta, XGR131
  • Re: Pen and paper demonstraion of non trivial zero of Rieman's Zeta, A N Niel
  • Re: Pen and paper demonstraion of non trivial zero of Rieman's Zeta, David C . Ullrich
    • Re: Pen and paper demonstraion of non trivial zero of Rieman's Zeta, Gerry Myerson
      • Re: Pen and paper demonstraion of non trivial zero of Rieman's Zeta, David C . Ullrich
• Irrep Weirdness, Hauke Reddmann
  • Re: Irrep Weirdness, Gerry Myerson
    • Re: Irrep Weirdness, Hauke Reddmann
      • Re: Irrep Weirdness, Gerry Myerson
      • Re: Irrep Weirdness, Hauke Reddmann