Re: Cantor and the binary tree
- From: Tony Orlow (aeo6) <aeo6@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 16:24:11 -0400
Daniel W. Johnson said:
> Tony Orlow <aeo6@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > So, you changed your mind again. Or, maybe you don't see that a range of
> > values is measured by the difference between the largest and smallest in
> > the set?
>
> Only if the range HAS a largest and smallest.
>
Sorry Johnson. The range is the maximum difference possible between ANY two
values in the set.
--
Smiles,
Tony
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree
- From: Virgil
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree
- References:
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree
- From: David Kastrup
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree
- From: Daniel W. Johnson
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree
- Prev by Date: Re: Cantor and the binary tree
- Next by Date: Re: Cantor and the binary tree
- Previous by thread: Re: Cantor and the binary tree
- Next by thread: Re: Cantor and the binary tree
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|