Re: CANTOR's theorem



Randy Poe wrote:
> mueck...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > *** T. Winter wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > I asked you to tell me what particular step in my proof is wrong. You
> > > still evade the question. Pray tell me. What particular step in my
> > > proof is wrong?
> >
> > It is no particular step, but
>
> Stop. There is no "but". If every step in a proof is
> right, then the proof is right.
>
> > as I said already the triple {m, M, g}
> > cannot exist.
>
> But you just said there are no incorrect steps in the
> proof. Therefore this must not be required by any of
> the steps.
>
> > The proof is based upon a requirement
>
> The proof has a requirement which is not a requirement
> for any step?


Insist: If and only if there are three unicorns present then 2 < 2.
Show that there is not even a single unicorn. Find 2 = 2.
Well proved. Every step is correct.

Regards, WM

.