Re: CANTOR's theorem

From: mueckenh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: 2 Jun 2005 13:36:46 -0700

Virgil wrote:

> >
> > It is quite a difference if you arrive at an absurd conclusion or if
> > you start off with an absurd request.
>
> Then stop making absurd requests.

I did never do so.

Regards, WM

.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: CANTOR's theorem
  - From: Virgil

References:
- Re: CANTOR's theorem
  - From: mueckenh
- Re: CANTOR's theorem
  - From: Randy Poe
- Re: CANTOR's theorem
  - From: mueckenh
- Re: CANTOR's theorem
  - From: Virgil

Prev by Date: Re: exponential equation with constant
Next by Date: Re: Your favorite troll warning signs
Previous by thread: Re: CANTOR's theorem
Next by thread: Re: CANTOR's theorem
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Relevant Pages

Re: Cantor and the binary tree
... Virgil wrote: ... fix and pick. ... Regards, WM ... Prev by Date: ...
(sci.math)
Re: Cantor and the binary tree
... Virgil wrote: ... > Two paths in a maximal binary tree are distinct if and only if there is ... Regards, WM ... Prev by Date: ...
(sci.math)
Re: abundance of irrationals!)
... Virgil wrote: ... IFF N is infinite, then my list contains numbers with ... Regards, WM ... Prev by Date: ...
(sci.math)
Re: abundance of irrationals!)
... Virgil wrote in message ... > The finite half open real interval (0,1] contains the set of rationals ... Regards, WM ... Prev by Date: ...
(sci.math)
Re: abundance of irrationals!)
... Martin Shobe wrote: ... >>Virgil wrote: ... Regards, WM ... Prev by Date: ...
(sci.math)