Re: Cantor and the binary tree
- From: David Kastrup <dak@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2005 01:46:55 +0200
Virgil <ITSnetNOTcom#virgil@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> In article <1117743153.673576.235420@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> mueckenh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
>> Of course it is so. If you have infinitely many meters, then this
>> makes up an infinite distance.
>
> There are points in this universe arbitrarily far apart, unless it
> should transpire that this universe is finite, but there are no two
> points in this universe that are infinitely far apart.
Please refrain from tying this into physics, an empiric science.
Mathematics is not democratic: reality does not have voting rights on
it.
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree
- From: Virgil
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree
- References:
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree
- From: mueckenh
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree
- From: Virgil
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree
- Prev by Date: Re: Notes and a question about 0^{infty}
- Next by Date: Re: eye movements and visual perception
- Previous by thread: Re: Cantor and the binary tree
- Next by thread: Re: Cantor and the binary tree
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|