Re: Cantor and the binary tree

From: mueckenh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: 5 Jun 2005 07:56:34 -0700

Virgil wrote:

> > Every statement beginning with "if" requires a decision.You should be
> > able to see that.
>
> Every statement beginning with "if" confirms a decision. You should be
> able to see that.

But this decision has first to be made. Even more than for the
definition of a number this decision is important for the question of
its existence, which is a huge difference. Cp:
http://www.fh-augsburg.de/~mueckenh/Infinity/P2%20R4%20final.doc

Regards, WM

.

References:
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree
  - From: David Kastrup
- Re: Cantor and the binary tree
  - From: aeo6

Prev by Date: Re: Cantor and the binary tree
Next by Date: Re: Cantor and the binary tree
Previous by thread: Re: Cantor and the binary tree
Next by thread: Re: Cantor and the binary tree
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Relevant Pages

Re: Cantor and the binary tree
... Virgil wrote: ... fix and pick. ... Regards, WM ... Prev by Date: ...
(sci.math)
Re: Cantor and the binary tree
... Virgil wrote: ... > Two paths in a maximal binary tree are distinct if and only if there is ... Regards, WM ... Prev by Date: ...
(sci.math)
Re: abundance of irrationals!)
... Virgil wrote: ... IFF N is infinite, then my list contains numbers with ... Regards, WM ... Prev by Date: ...
(sci.math)
Re: Canonical names for kernel objects
... > From the documentation it appears so. ... I am only aware of the existence of ... Regards, ... Prev by Date: ...
(microsoft.public.win32.programmer.kernel)
Re: abundance of irrationals!)
... Virgil wrote: ... >> Dik T. Winter wrote: ... Regards, WM ... Prev by Date: ...
(sci.math)