Re: Cantor and the binary tree

Hi Tony,

Don't let yourself get goaded into a persecution complex. While that
would satisfy some of the participant's more prurient motivations, it
does you no good. Virgil is really sly, I agree, you just have to let
that go because I say so. Feel free to fight fire with fire, just
don't let it bring you down.

Focus your arguments, including the more obscure points, only stick
with arguments that you yourself believe, cataloging others that you
find contradictory. Proceed.

Hi,

Infinite sets are equivalent. ZF is inconsistent. There's a universal
set. In the monadic universe functions between monadic objects and
monadic objects are monadic objects, and so the universe is infinite
and infinite sets are equivalent. Here the monad is not the Lebniz
monad, nor the pervert gonad, it's a variously physical,
set-theoretical, number-theoretical, or geometrical primary object of
the theory, and quite similar to the monad of Leibniz' monadic theory.


In considering a well-ordering of the reals, that's one of Hilbert's
problems.

/\
|_ Warning: spoilers.

Have a nice day,

Ross

.

Quantcast