Re: Why is there no *really* useful Algebra beyond complex numbers? (and if it were, would John Baez talk about it?)
- From: Robin Chapman <rjc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2005 17:58:36 +0100
Roger Bersford wrote:
> Sorry- I was writing as a myopic engineer! I should have said "many",
> not "most"; many Banach algebras are Hoops.
Really? Like hula hoops?
--
Robin Chapman, www.maths.ex.ac.uk/~rjc/rjc.html
"Elegance is an algorithm"
Iain M. Banks, _The Algebraist_
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: Linear Iteration Rules
- Next by Date: Re: mathematician salaries
- Previous by thread: Re: Why is there no *really* useful Algebra beyond complex numbers? (and if it were, would John Baez talk about it?)
- Next by thread: Re: Why is there no *really* useful Algebra beyond complex numbers? (and if it were, would John Baez talk about it?)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
