Re: ??? Quaternions ???---
- From: Timothy Murphy <tim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 12:34:18 +0100
Zigoteau wrote:
> Just an afterthought. It has just struck me that the need to compute
> rotations in a standard 4D Euclidean space is not thick on the ground.
> However, it might be interesting if you had an algorithm for handling
> Lorentz transformations. Can your quaternion algorithm be extended to
> the case of Lorentz transforms?
I wouldn't have thought quaternions were particularly useful in this case.
As I see it, quaternions are useful for studying rotations in 3 dimensions
because of the covering group
Sp(1) = SU(2) -> SO(3).
The corresponding covering group for Lorentz transformations is
SL(2,C) -> SO(1,3)
which is the basis for spinors,
and I would have thought that was a better analogy.
--
Timothy Murphy
e-mail (<80k only): tim /at/ birdsnest.maths.tcd.ie
tel: +353-86-2336090, +353-1-2842366
s-mail: School of Mathematics, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland
.
- References:
- ??? Quaternions ???
- From: weg22
- Re: ??? Quaternions ???-
- From: JEMebius
- Re: ??? Quaternions ???-
- From: Zigoteau
- Re: ??? Quaternions ???--
- From: JEMebius
- Re: ??? Quaternions ???--
- From: Zigoteau
- Re: ??? Quaternions ???---
- From: JEMebius
- Re: ??? Quaternions ???---
- From: Zigoteau
- Re: ??? Quaternions ???---
- From: Zigoteau
- ??? Quaternions ???
- Prev by Date: Re: field extension problem
- Next by Date: Re: Orlow cardinality question
- Previous by thread: Re: ??? Quaternions ???---
- Next by thread: Re: ??? Quaternions ???---
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading