Re: martingale betting system question
- From: richard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Richard Tobin)
- Date: 15 Jun 2005 14:28:14 GMT
In article <j0d0b15tq86g4jh4cqr9rduapi0iap3vql@xxxxxxx>,
David C. Ullrich <ullrich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>If there's no limit on the size of the bet and you have infinitely
>much money then the martingale _is_ a winning system, in the
>sense that (with probability 1) you will eventually win a bet,
>and at that point you will have made a profit of one unit.
And if it seems surprising that you can win, bear in mind that it's
assumed that you always have the choice of when to stop betting.
You can insist on making a bet but the casino can't.
>(Let's ignore the fact that if you have infinitely much
>money you haven't actually gained anything by winning one
>more unit.)
Well, you could just *borrow* an infinite amount of money.
-- Richard
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: martingale betting system question
- From: David C . Ullrich
- Re: martingale betting system question
- From: double d
- Re: martingale betting system question
- References:
- Re: martingale betting system question
- From: David C . Ullrich
- Re: martingale betting system question
- Prev by Date: Re: Anti-humanistic mathematics was Re: Humanistic mathematics (Cantor's Theory)
- Next by Date: Looking for references concerning combinatorial questions
- Previous by thread: Re: martingale betting system question
- Next by thread: Re: martingale betting system question
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|