Re: martingale betting system question
- From: David C. Ullrich <ullrich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 08:13:31 -0500
On 15 Jun 2005 14:28:14 GMT, richard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Richard Tobin)
wrote:
>In article <j0d0b15tq86g4jh4cqr9rduapi0iap3vql@xxxxxxx>,
>David C. Ullrich <ullrich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>If there's no limit on the size of the bet and you have infinitely
>>much money then the martingale _is_ a winning system, in the
>>sense that (with probability 1) you will eventually win a bet,
>>and at that point you will have made a profit of one unit.
>
>And if it seems surprising that you can win, bear in mind that it's
>assumed that you always have the choice of when to stop betting.
>You can insist on making a bet but the casino can't.
>
>>(Let's ignore the fact that if you have infinitely much
>>money you haven't actually gained anything by winning one
>>more unit.)
>
>Well, you could just *borrow* an infinite amount of money.
Ooh, I can? Where? (Ya think they'd notice if I borrowed an
infinite amount of money and then only paid half of it back?)
>-- Richard
************************
David C. Ullrich
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: martingale betting system question
- From: Jean-Claude Arbaut
- Re: martingale betting system question
- References:
- Re: martingale betting system question
- From: David C . Ullrich
- Re: martingale betting system question
- From: Richard Tobin
- Re: martingale betting system question
- Prev by Date: Re: martingale betting system question
- Next by Date: Re: martingale betting system question
- Previous by thread: Re : Re : martingale betting system question
- Next by thread: Re: martingale betting system question
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|