Re: martingale betting system question
- From: Dave Seaman <dseaman@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 13:12:00 +0000 (UTC)
On Thu, 16 Jun 2005 15:03:30 +0200, Jean-Claude Arbaut wrote:
> Le 16/06/2005 15:13, dans llu2b1ddnfgoi4ppd5par45kfe1ahfm2si@xxxxxxx,
> « David C. Ullrich » <ullrich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
>>>
>>> Well, you could just *borrow* an infinite amount of money.
>>
>> Ooh, I can? Where? (Ya think they'd notice if I borrowed an
>> infinite amount of money and then only paid half of it back?)
> That would mean ruin for casinos :-) Every guy would win
> with the 2^n martingale. Too easy.
What difference would it make whether you pay back twice infinity or only
half of infinity?
--
Dave Seaman
Judge Yohn's mistakes revealed in Mumia Abu-Jamal ruling.
<http://www.commoncouragepress.com/index.cfm?action=book&bookid=228>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: martingale betting system question
- From: Jean-Claude Arbaut
- Re: martingale betting system question
- References:
- Re: martingale betting system question
- From: David C . Ullrich
- Re: martingale betting system question
- From: Richard Tobin
- Re: martingale betting system question
- From: David C . Ullrich
- Re: martingale betting system question
- From: Jean-Claude Arbaut
- Re: martingale betting system question
- Prev by Date: Re: Anti-humanistic mathematics was Re: Humanistic mathematics (Cantor's Theory)
- Next by Date: Re: martingale betting system question
- Previous by thread: Re: martingale betting system question
- Next by thread: Re: martingale betting system question
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading