Re: Re : martingale betting system question
- From: David C. Ullrich <ullrich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 12:04:03 -0500
On Thu, 16 Jun 2005 17:11:29 +0200, Jean-Claude Arbaut
<jean-claude.arbaut@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
>Le 16/06/2005 17:03, dans 6153b1lonhrc6n4hrrau92avivhjd8f8pv@xxxxxxx,
>« David C. Ullrich » <ullrich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
>
>> On Thu, 16 Jun 2005 15:19:32 +0200, Jean-Claude Arbaut
>> <jean-claude.arbaut@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Le 16/06/2005 15:12, dans d8rtr0$qut$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, « Dave
>>> Seaman » <dseaman@xxxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
>>>
>>>> On Thu, 16 Jun 2005 15:03:30 +0200, Jean-Claude Arbaut wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Le 16/06/2005 15:13, dans llu2b1ddnfgoi4ppd5par45kfe1ahfm2si@xxxxxxx,
>>>>> « David C. Ullrich » <ullrich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Well, you could just *borrow* an infinite amount of money.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ooh, I can? Where? (Ya think they'd notice if I borrowed an
>>>>>> infinite amount of money and then only paid half of it back?)
>>>>
>>>>> That would mean ruin for casinos :-) Every guy would win
>>>>> with the 2^n martingale. Too easy.
>>>>
>>>> What difference would it make whether you pay back twice infinity or only
>>>> half of infinity?
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Oh, sorry, I answered the previous question :-)
>>> Yeah, you're right, no difference. But, you can give infinite
>>> money to everybody on earth, there is still no difference.
>>
>> You still need to read more carefully. Yes of course if
>> everyone had infinitely much money then money would be
>> worthless. But Richard (Tobin - you should be more careful
>> about attributions) didn't say anything about everyone
>> having infinitely much money, he said that _I_ could
>> borrow infinitely much money.
>
>You don't understand: if you borrow infinitely much money,
>then you can give infinitely much money to infinitely many
>people (also to finitely many, obviously), and you still
>have infinitely much money. Am I wrong ?
Sigh. Yes, of course I _can_ do that. But why _would_ I?
As you point out, after I do that my money will have
no value.
Nope, not me. I'm gonna borrow my infinitely much money,
give half back, and keep the rest.
>That's a question of bijection of N on N^2.
>
>>> Infinite money leads to end of money :-) I mean, an infinite
>>> quantity of money would have an infinitely small value.
>>
>>
>> ************************
>>
>> David C. Ullrich
************************
David C. Ullrich
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: martingale betting system question
- From: Jean-Claude Arbaut
- Re: martingale betting system question
- References:
- Re: martingale betting system question
- From: David C . Ullrich
- Re: martingale betting system question
- From: Richard Tobin
- Re: martingale betting system question
- From: David C . Ullrich
- Re: martingale betting system question
- From: Jean-Claude Arbaut
- Re: martingale betting system question
- From: Dave Seaman
- Re: martingale betting system question
- From: Jean-Claude Arbaut
- Re: martingale betting system question
- From: David C . Ullrich
- Re : martingale betting system question
- From: Jean-Claude Arbaut
- Re: martingale betting system question
- Prev by Date: Re: martingale betting system question
- Next by Date: Re: root of all evil ...
- Previous by thread: Re : martingale betting system question
- Next by thread: Re: martingale betting system question
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|