Re: Zero digits in powers
- From: Gerry Myerson <gerry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 09:26:53 +1000
In article <1118950785.269911.221560@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
vkarlamov@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> *** T. Winter wrote:
> > In article <1118885085.834902.286300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > vkarlamov@xxxxxxxxx writes:
> > > Assume for the fun of it that the digits in the decimal
> > > representation of 2^n are independently and uniformly
> > > distributed.
> >
> > But they are not. The probability that the first digit is k is about
> > log(k + 1) - log(k), and similar formula's for larger sequences.
> >
> log base 10?
Yes.
--
Gerry Myerson (gerry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) (i -> u for email)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Zero digits in powers
- From: vkarlamov
- Re: Zero digits in powers
- References:
- Zero digits in powers
- From: Jean-Claude Arbaut
- Re: Zero digits in powers
- From: vkarlamov
- Re: Zero digits in powers
- From: *** T. Winter
- Re: Zero digits in powers
- From: vkarlamov
- Zero digits in powers
- Prev by Date: Re: Zero digits in powers
- Next by Date: Want a copy of Vajda's "Fibonacci and Lucas Numbers, and The Golden section"
- Previous by thread: Re: Zero digits in powers
- Next by thread: Re: Zero digits in powers
- Index(es):