Re: Zero digits in powers

Timothy Little wrote:
> vkarlamov@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > More than that, I truly believe that the fact that there should be a
> > 0 inside the decimal representation of very long numbers isn't a
> > question in number theory. It is truly a question in probability and
> > only the probailistic aaproach can give a general proof.
>
> What's probabilistic about it? If you calculate n^40 for some large
> fixed n multiple times, do you expect the result to sometimes differ?
>

I don't think you understand my approach.

>
> More fundamentally, what's your measure space?
>

The set of natural numbers.

.

Quantcast