Re: Zero digits in powers
- From: vkarlamov@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: 18 Jun 2005 19:47:32 -0700
Jean-Claude Arbaut wrote:
>
> You eggagerate greatly. If think I was wrong on this point about sigma
> algebras. There are many as I said, but as you said it seems always possible
> to decompose in blocks. I had forgotten this, and was looking for a counter
> example, like 2^p*N (N being the natural integers). Sigh. They all fail, and
> I missed the point here. Let's say I was tired :-)
>
Look, Jean-Claude. The bottom line is that if you find the concept of a
sigma algebra on a discrete space to be challenging, you are not
prepared to understand my proposed probabilistic approach. So why
prolong the mutual suffering?
I oferred what I thought to be a productive suggestion. In return, you
made fun of me and smeared me with filth.
So, you don't want my suggestion. Too bad. Sigh.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Zero digits in powers
- From: Jean-Claude Arbaut
- Re: Zero digits in powers
- References:
- Re: Zero digits in powers
- From: Gerry Myerson
- Re: Zero digits in powers
- From: vkarlamov
- Re: Zero digits in powers
- From: Jean-Claude Arbaut
- Re: Zero digits in powers
- From: vkarlamov
- Re: Zero digits in powers
- From: Jean-Claude Arbaut
- Re: Zero digits in powers
- From: vkarlamov
- Re: Zero digits in powers
- From: Timothy Little
- Re: Zero digits in powers
- From: vkarlamov
- Re: Zero digits in powers
- From: Timothy Little
- Re: Zero digits in powers
- From: vkarlamov
- Re: Zero digits in powers
- From: Jean-Claude Arbaut
- Re: Zero digits in powers
- From: vkarlamov
- Re: Zero digits in powers
- From: Jean-Claude Arbaut
- Re: Zero digits in powers
- From: vkarlamov
- Re: Zero digits in powers
- From: vkarlamov
- Re: Zero digits in powers
- From: Jean-Claude Arbaut
- Re: Zero digits in powers
- Prev by Date: Re: Zero digits in powers
- Next by Date: Re: Zero digits in powers
- Previous by thread: Re: Zero digits in powers
- Next by thread: Re: Zero digits in powers
- Index(es):