Re: Cantor and the binary tree





Virgil wrote:

> > Nevertheless. The nodes are the only chances for paths to separate /
> > distinguish themselves from others. Therefore there are only countably
> > many fifferent paths.
>
> Non sequitur.

How then can they be distinguished?
>
> This no more proves countability of the set of paths than the fact that
> lists of bits can represent all reals in [0,1] proves the reals
> couontable. The set of all such lists, like the set of all those maximal
> paths, is uncountable.

By construction of the tree we see that all binary representations
which differ at a finite position are represented by bunches (=
non-empty subsets) of paths in the tree. Further we see that they can
distinguish themselves only at nodes or branches. The occasions to do
so are countable.

Regards, WM

.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Existence of reals and observation of them
    ... real were finitely definable using a language with a countable number ... countability of the whole continuum; ... disjoint sets F and I, F being the "finitely defined" reals, and I ... No. is compatible with the uncountability of R and we the ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Existence of reals and observation of them
    ... definitions in any language must be countably infinite at most. ... Cantor, nevertheless, didn't. ... countability of the whole continuum; ... assume the existence of a Hamel basis for the reals as a vector space ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Existence of reals and observation of them
    ... countability of the whole continuum; ... Cantor says that the set of all finitely definable reals is ... This can happen in no human language. ... uncountability of the reals and Konig's claim of. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Is one-to-one mapping valid for comparing infinite-sized sets?
    ... Countability and infinity are two different properties. ... Something can be either finite or infinite, ... surjections from the naturals and sets to which no such surjections can ... What does "uncountable field of reals" mean? ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: A consideration concerning the diagonal argument of G. Cantor
    ... belong to a sequence of sequences, i.e., belong to a countable set. ... all reals" and "There is a sequence containing all reals" mean exactly ... So give us a definition countability that cover ALL countable sets. ...
    (sci.math)