Re: Zero digits in powers
- From: ol3@xxxxxxxxx (Oscar Lanzi III)
- Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 19:37:39 -0500
*** T. Winter makes a valid point. When you use a probabilistic model,
you're really guessing when you have accurately identified a sample
space. In the fifth-power summation example, the factorization in the
formula happesn to give enough information for the proabilistic model to
identify the right proposition. Probabilistc models can give an idea of
what might be most fruitful to try to prove -- but if in the process of
solving the problem you come across new information, you need to
reevaulate your probabilistic expectations in light thereof.
Incidentally, 34N^2-1 is always congruent with 5 or 7 modulo 8. There
you have it.
--OL
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Zero digits in powers
- From: *** T. Winter
- 34N^2-1 (was Re: Zero digits in powers)
- From: Gerry Myerson
- Re: Zero digits in powers
- References:
- Re: Zero digits in powers
- From: *** T. Winter
- Re: Zero digits in powers
- Prev by Date: Re: cubic equation - is it really solvable?
- Next by Date: Re: 2(1 + 1) = 2 with proof. Ambiguities
- Previous by thread: Re: Zero digits in powers
- Next by thread: 34N^2-1 (was Re: Zero digits in powers)
- Index(es):
Loading